Coping strategies in individuals at risk and not at risk of mobile phone addiction

Ewa Dziurzyńska 1 , Beata Pawłowska 2 , and Emilia Potembska 3
  • 1 Department of Psychology of the University of Rzeszów
  • 2 2 Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Medical University of Lublin
  • 3 Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Medical University of Lublin


The aim of the present study was to provide an answer to the question of whether, and what, differences in stress coping strategies could be found between university students at risk and those not at risk of mobile phone addiction. The study included 408 students aged 19 to 28 years. The following instruments were used: a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Mobile Phone Addiction Assessment Questionnaire (in Polish, Kwestionariusz do Badania Uzależnienia od Telefonu Komórkowego, KBUTK) by Pawłowska and Potembska, and the Coping with Stress Questionnaire (SVF) by Janke, Erdmann, and Boucsein, translated into Polish by Januszewska. The results of the study showed that individuals at risk of mobile phone addiction were more likely to cope with stress by seeking substitute gratification, reacting with resignation, passivity, dejection and hopelessness, blaming themselves, pitying themselves and looking for support. They also tended to ruminate over their suffering, withdraw from social interactions, react with aggression and/or take to drinking.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Griffiths M.D. Technological addictions. Clin Psychol Forum, 1995; 76: 14–19.

  • 2. Griffiths M.D. Does Internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. Cyberpsychol. Behav, 2000; 3(2): 211–218.

  • 3. Griffiths M.D. A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J. Subst. Use, 2005; 10(4):191–197.

  • 4. Toda M., Monden K., Kubo K., Morimoto K. Mobile phone dependence and health-related lifestyle of university students. Soc. Behav. Pers., 2006; 34(10): 1277–1284.

  • 5. Yen C.F., Tang T.C., Yen J.Y., Lin H.C., Huang C.F., Liu S.C., et al. Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in Southern Taiwan. J. Adolesc., 2009; 32: 863–873.

  • 6. Grant J., Potenza N.M., Weinstein A., Gorelick A.D. Introduction to behavioral addictions. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse, 2010; 36(5): 233–241.

  • 7. Park B.W., Lee K.C. The effect of users’ characteristics and experiential factors on the compulsive usage of the smartphone. Ubiquitous Computing and Multimedia Applications, 2011; 151: 438–446

  • 8. Smetaniuk P. A preliminary investigation into the prevalence and prediction of problematic cell phone use. J. Behav. Addict., 2014; 3(1): 41–53.

  • 9. Chóliz M. Mobile phone addiction: a point of issue. Addiction, 2010; 105(2): 373–374.

  • 10. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

  • 11. Klasyfikacja zaburzeń psychicznych i zaburzeń zachowania w ICD-10. Badawcze kryteria diagnostyczne. Kraków, Warszawa; Uniwersyteckie Wydawnictwo Medyczne „Vesalius”. Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii: 2000.

  • 12. Bianchi A, Phillips J.G. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychol. Behav, 2005; 8(1): 39–51.

  • 13. Billieux J., Van der Linden M., D’Acremont M., Ceschi G., Zermatten A. Does Impulsivity Relate to Perceived Dependence on and Actual Use of the Mobile Phone? Appl. Cogn. Psychol, 2007; 21(4): 527-537.

  • 14. Billieux J. Problematic use of the mobile phone: A literature review and a pathways model. Curr. Psychiatry Rev., 2012; 8: 299–307.

  • 15. López-Fernández O., Honrubia-Serrano L., Freixa-Blanxart M., Gibson W. Prevalence of Problematic Mobile Phone Use in British Adolescents. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw., 2013; 17(2): 91-98.

  • 16. Hong F.Y., Chiu S.I., Hong D.H. A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Comput. Human Behav., 2012; 28(6): 2152–2159.

  • 17. Leung L. Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, addiction symptoms and patterns of mobile phone use. In: E. Korini, S. Utz, M. Tanis, S. Barnes, eds., Mediated interpersonal communication New York; Routledge: 2008, pp. 359-381.

  • 18. Leung L. Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong. J. Child. Media, 2008; 2(2): 93–113.

  • 19. Potembska E., Pawłowska B. Właściwości psychometryczne Kwestionariusza do Badania Uzależnienia od Telefonu Komórkowego (KBUTK). Bad. Schizofr., 2009; 10: 322-329.

  • 20. Fargues M., Lusar A., Jordania C. Sánchez X. Validación de dos es calas breves para evaluar la adicción a Internet y el abuso del móvil. Psicothema, 2009; 21(3): 480-485.

  • 21. Pedrero Pérez E.J., Rodríguez Monje M.T., Ruiz Sánchez De León J.M. Mobile phone abuse or addiction. A review of the literature. Adicciones, 2012; 24(2): 139–152.

  • 22. Jenaro, C., Flores N., Gómez-Vela M., González-Gil F., Caballo C. Problematic internet and cell-phone use: Psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addict. Res. Theory, 2007; 15(3): 309–320.

  • 23. Toda M., Monden K., Kubo K., Morimoto K. Cellular phone dependence tendency of female university students. Jap. J. Hygiene, 2004; 59: 383–386.

  • 24. Walsh S.P., White K.M., Young R.M. Needing to connect: the effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. Aust. J. Psychol., 2010; 62(4): 194–203.

  • 25. Walsh S.P., White K.M., Young R.M. Over-connected? A qualitative exploration of the relationship between Australian youth and their mobile phones. J. Adolesc., 2008; 31(1): 77–92.

  • 26. Mok J.Y., Choi S.W., Kim D.J., Choi J.S., Lee J., Ahn H., et al. Latent class analysis on internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat., 2014; 10: 817–828.

  • 27. Billieux J., Van der Linden M., Rochat L. The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. J. Appl. Psychol., 2008: 22(9): 1195–1210.

  • 28. Billieux J, Gay P, Rochat L, Van der Linden M. The role of urgency and its underlying psychological mechanisms in problematic behaviours. Behav. Res. Ther., 2010; 48(11): 1085–1096.

  • 29. Kim D., Lee Y., Lee J., Nam J.K., Chung Y. Development of Korean smartphone addiction proneness scale for youth. PLoS ONE, 2014; 9(5): e97920.

  • 30. Lin Y.H., Chang L.R., Lee Y.H., Tseng H.W., Kuo T.B., Chen S.H. Development and validation of the smartphone addiction inventory(SPAI). PLoS ONE, 2014; 9(6): e98312.

  • 31. White M.P., Eiser J.R., Harris P.R. Risk perceptions of mobile phone use while driving. Risk Anal., 2004; 24(2): 323–334.

  • 32. Thomée S., Härenstam A., Hagberg M. Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults - a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health, 2011; 11: 66.

  • 33. Roberts J.A., Pirog S.F. A preliminary investigation of materialism and impulsiveness as predictors of technological addictions among young adults. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2013; 2(1): 56–62.

  • 34. King A.L.S., Valença A.M., Silva A.C.O., Baczynski T., Carvalho M.R., Nardi A.E. Nomophobia: dependency on virtual environments or social phobia? Comput. Human Behav., 2013; 29(1): 140–144.

  • 35. Billieux J., Philippot P., Schmid C., Maurage P, De Mol J., Van der Linden M. Is Dysfunctional Use of the Mobile Phone a Behavioural Addiction? Confronting Symptom-Based Versus Process-Based Approaches. Clin. Psychol. Psychother., 2014; 22(5): 460-468.

  • 36. Shambare R., Rugimbana R. Zhowa T. Are mobile phones the 21st century addiction? Afr. J. Busin. Manag., 2012; 62(2): 573–577.

  • 37. CBOS 2015. Korzystanie z telefonów komórkowych. Komunikat z badań nr 125/2015. Warszawa: Fundacja Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej. (do-stęp 29.07.2016)

  • 38. Roberts J.A., YaYa L.H. P., Manolis C. The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. J. Behav. Addict., 2014; 3(4): 254–265.

  • 39. Potembska E. Uzależnienie i zagrożenie uzależnieniem od Internetu u młodzieży. Niepublikowana rozprawa doktorska. Lublin; Uniwersytet Medyczny: 2011.

  • 40. Pawłowska B, Potembska E. Objawy zagrożenia i uzależnienia od telefonu komórkowego mierzonego Kwestionariuszem do Badania Uzależnienia od Telefonu Komórkowego, autorstwa Potembskiej i Pawłowskiej u młodzieży w wieku do 13 do 24 lat. Curr. Probl. Psychiatry, 2011; 12(4): 395-397.

  • 41. Januszewska E. Style reagowania na stres w kontekście postaw rodzicielskich. Badania młodzieży w okresie adolescencji. In: D. Kornas-Biela ed., Rodzina: źródło życia i szkoła miłości. Lublin; Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL: 2000, pp. 313-344.

  • 42. Januszewska E. Kwestionariusz radzenia sobie ze stresem (KRS). Wartość diagnostyczna i wyniki badań młodzieży. In: M. Oleś ed., Wybrane zagadnienia z psychologii klinicznej i osobowości. Metody diagnostyczne w badaniach dzieci i młodzieży. Tom 6. Lublin; Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL: 2005, pp. 91-123.

  • 43. Roberts J.A., Pullig Ch., Manolis Ch. I need my smartphone: A hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Pers. Individ. Dif., 2015; 79: 13–19.

  • 44. Amiel T., Sargent S.L. Individual differences in Internet usage motives. Comput. Human Behav., 2004; 20(6): 711–726.

  • 45. Desarbo W., Edwards E. Typologies of compulsive buying behavior: A constrained clusterwise regression approach. J. Consum. Psychol., 1996; 5(3): 231–262.

  • 46. Faber R.J., O’Guinn T.C. Compulsive buying. Review and reflection. In: C.P. Haugtvedt, P.M. Herr, F.R. Kardes eds., Handbook of Consumer Psychology. New York; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 2008, pp. 1039-1056.

  • 47. Grover A., Kamins M. A., Martin I. M., Davis S., Haws K., Mirabito A. M., et al. From use to abuse: When everyday consumption behaviors morph into addictive consumptive behaviors. J. Res. Consumers, 2011; 19: 1–8.

  • 48. Billieux J., Maurage P., Lopez-Fernandez O. Kuss D.J., Griffiths M.D. Can Disordered Mobile Phone Use Be Considered a Behavioral Addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Curr. Addict. Rep., 2015; 2(2): 156-162.

  • 49. Young K.S. Addictive use of the Internet: A case study that breaks the stereotype. Psychol. Rep., 1996; 79: 899-902.

  • 50. Grüsser S.M., Thalemann R., Albrecht U., Thalemann C.N. Exzessive Computernutzung im Kindesalter - Ergebnisse einer psychometrischen Erhebung. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 2005; 117(5-6): 188-195.

  • 51. Kwon J.H., Chung C.S., Lee J. The effects of escape from self and interpersonal relationship on the pathological use of internet games. Community Ment. Health J., 2011; 47(1): 113-121.

  • 52. Wan C.S., Chiou W.B. Why are adolescents addicted to online gaming? An interview study in Taiwan. Cyberpsychol. Behav, 2006; 9(6): 762-766.

  • 53. Li H., Wang J., Wang L. A Survey on the Generalized Problematic Internet Use in Chinese College Students and its Relations to Stressful Life Events and Coping Style. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict., 2009; 7(2): 333-346.

  • 54. Seepersad S. Coping with Loneliness: Adolescent Online and Offline Behavior. Cyberpsychol. Behav, 2004; 7(1): 35-39.


Journal + Issues