Discrimination of Various Vulnerable Groups - Perception Among the Students of the Faculty of Engineering (“Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu)

Open access


The purpose of this article is to highlight students’ perception of the Faculty of Engineering concerning discrimination, particularly discrimination against certain vulnerable groups. This issue is part of a broader research that aims to assess the attitude of students towards discrimination.

The method used in the study is questionnaire-based survey. The questionnaire includes scales and subscales for measuring the attitudes of subjects, their emotions, cognitions and behaviors in relation to discrimination in general, and specifically in relation to certain vulnerable groups such as the Roma population, people with HIV/AIDS, people with a different sexual orientation or people with disabilities and mental illness.

The main results of our research have demonstrated that the students from engineering believe that there is discrimination within society, including at the level of educational institutions; the most discriminated category is Roma population.

These results reflect the importance of training engineering students in the field of ethics and non-discrimination. We conclude that there is a need of such courses in the context of promoting inclusive societies and of the rebirth of business ethics education at an international level.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bjerregaard T. Lauring J. (2013). Managing contradictions of corporate social responsibility: the sustainability of diversity in a frontrunner firm. Business Ethics: A European Review Volume 22 Number 2

  • Blasco M. (2012). Aligning the hidden curriculum of management education with PRME. Journal of Management Education 36(3) 364-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1052562911420213

  • Bohner D. Dickel N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology 62 391-417

  • Caldwell C. (2010). A ten-step model for academic integrity: a positive approach for business schools. Journal of Business Ethics 92(1) 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0144-7

  • Crano W. D. Prislin R. (2008). Attitudes and attitude change. New York: Psychology Press

  • Dipboye E. L. Colella A. (2005). Discrimination at work. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

  • Dovidio F. F. Gaertner S. L. (1998). On the nature of contemporary prejudice: The causes consequences and challenges of aversive racism. Newbury Park CA: Sage

  • Engelen B. (2011). Beyond markets and states: the importance of communities. UNESCO Blackwell Publishing Oxford pp 489-500

  • Gawronski B. Bodenhausen G. V. (2007). Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: attitudes from the perspective of the APE model. Social Cognition 25 687-717

  • Georgescu M. A. (2012). Business ethics and organizational values in Romanian enterprises. Procedia Economics and Finance 3 (2012) 734-739

  • Goela Mridula and Ramanathan Preeti E. (2014). Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility – Is there a dividing line? Procedia Economics and Finance 11 (2014) 49-59

  • Gülcan N.Y. (2015). Discussing the importance of teaching ethics in education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174 (2015) 2622-2625

  • Jagger S. Volkman R. (2014). Helping students to see for themselves that ethics matters. The International Journal of Management Education 12 (2014) 177-185

  • Kacetl J. (2014). Business Ethics for Students of Management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 109 (2014) 875-879

  • Kurpis L. V. Beqiri M. S. & Helgeson J. G. (2008). The effects of commitment to moral self-improvement and religiosity on ethics of business students. Journal of Business Ethics 80 447-463

  • Levy E. S. & Rakovski C. C. (2006). A zero tolerance professor and student registration choices. Research in Higher Education 47(6) 735-754

  • Olson J. M. & Zanna M. P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology 44 117-154

  • Parmar B. L. Freeman R. E. Harrison J. S. Wicks A. C. Purnell L. Colle S. D. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. The Academy of Management Annals 4:1 403-445 DOI:10.1080/19416520.2010.495581

  • Percepţii şi atitudini privind discriminarea în România; TNS CSOP Romania; 2012 (http://www.cncd.org.ro/files/file/Raport%20de%20cercetare%20CNCD_Discriminare.pdf retrieved 23.01.2014)

  • Percepţii şi atitudini ale populaţiei României faţă de fenomenul de discriminare în 2013; IRES CNCD; 2013 (http://www.ires.com.ro/articol/247/perceptii-si-atitudini-ale-populatiei-romaniei-fata-de-fenomenul-de-discriminare-in-2013 retrieved 23.04.2014)

  • Rao S. (2004). Faculty attitudes and students with disabilities in higher education: a literature review. College Student Journal 28 191-198

  • Wang Q. Zhang W. & Zhu Q. (2015). Directing engineering ethics training toward practical effectiveness. Technology in Society xxx (2015) 1-5

  • Wankel C. & Stachowicz-Stanusch A. (eds.) (2011). Management education for integrity Bingley UK: Emerald Group

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 185 107 4
PDF Downloads 94 60 3