Geostatistical Analysis of the Permeability Coefficient in Different Soil Textures

Open access


Estimating soil hydraulic properties are so important for hydrological modeling, designing irrigation-drainage systems and soil transmission of soluble salts and pollutants, although measurements of such parameters have been found costly and time-consuming. Owing to a high spatial variability of soil hydraulic characteristics, a large number of soil samples are required for proper analysis. Nowadays, geostatistical methods are used to estimate soil parameters on the basis of limited data. The purpose of this research is to investigate the spatial variability of the permeability coefficient in different soil textures (26 soil samples) found in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. The parameter values obtained indicated a normal trend in particle size distribution, whereas the values of permeability coefficient showed aberrant distribution patterns. Geostatistical analysis results indicated the best fitted theoretical model was Gaussian model and the proportion of sill/(sill + nugget) was 0.17 indicated strong spatial dependency of soil permeability. Furthermore, the optimal distance for estimating the soil permeability coefficient was 109,119 meters. A comparison of the kriging and IDW interpolation methods showed that both methods can estimate soil permeability with high accuracy and less error. The prediction maps of the applied methods indicated that high soil permeability rates were recorded in the south-east of the Kurdistan region of Iraq compared to low soil permeability rates recorded in the remainder of this region. It is recommended other interpolation methods such as co-kriging and indicator or simple kriging methods could be used to simulate data in large scale areas as well.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • AHMED EL-KADI.: Variation of Rainfall and Drought Conditions in Gaza-Palestine: on a Regional and Global Context. Journal of Islamic University Vol. 9-No.2:41-66 2001.

  • ALEMI M.H. SHARIARI M.R. NIELSON D.R.: Kriging and co-kriging of soil water properties. Soil Technology 1:117-132 1998.

  • BRAUD I. HAVERKAMP R. ARRUE J.L. LOPEZ M.V.: Spatial variability of soil surface properties and consequences for the annual and monthly water balance of a semiarid environment (EFEDA Experiment). Journal of Hydrometeorology 4:121–137 2003.

  • CAMBARDELLA C.A. MOORAM T.B. NOVAK J.M. PARKIN T.B. KARLEN D.L. TURCO R.F. KONOPKA A.E.: Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 58:1501-1511 1994.

  • DAY P.R.: Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. Chap. 43 in Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1. C.A. Black ed. American Society of Agronomy Madison. 545-567 1965.

  • FATHI M. HAJABBASI M.A. KHADEMI H.: Spatial distribution of some physical soil attributes of southern Esfahan in field scale. The 6th Soil Science Congress Ferdowsi University pp. 605-607 2000 (in Persian).

  • FAO.: Towards sustainable agricultural development in Iraq: The Transition from Relief Rehabilitation and Reconstruction to Development. 222 pp 2003.

  • GOOVARETS P.: Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1-45 1999.

  • GHORBANI S. HOMAEE M. MAHDIAN M.H.: Site dependence performance of infiltration models. Water Resources Management 23:2777-2790 2009.

  • GHORBANI S. HOMAEE M. MAHDIAN M.H.: Influence of land use on spatial variability of infiltration parameters. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 4(2): 206-221 2011 (in Persian with English abstract).

  • IQBAL J. THOMASSON A. JENKINS J.N. OWENS P.R. WHISLER F.D.: Spatial variability analysis of soil physical properties of alluvial soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69:1338-1350 2005.

  • KHALEDIAN M. MOUSSAVI S.A. ASSADI H. NOWROUZI M.: Determination of saturated hydraulic conductivity using Beerkan method in watershed to use in Hydrological model. p. 1-5. In proceeding of the 12thIranian Soil Sciences Congress University of Tabriz Tabriz Iran 3-5 Sep. 2011 (in Persian with English abstract).

  • MALLANTS D. MOHANTY B.P. VERVOORT A. FEYEN J.: Spatial analysis of saturated hydraulic conductivity in a soil with macropores. Soil Technology 10:115-131 1997.

  • MOHANTY B.P. ANKENY M.D. HORTON R. KANWAR R.S.: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity measured by disc infiltrometer. Water Resources Research 30:2489–2498 1994.

  • MOOSAVI A.A. SEPASKHAH A.R.: Spatial variability of physicochemical properties and hydraulic characteristics of a gravelly calcareous soil. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 58:631-658 2012.

  • MORADI M. GHONCHEHPOUR D. MAJIDI A. MAHMOUDINEJAD V.: Geostatistic approaches for investigating of soil hydraulic conductivity in Shahrekord Plain Iran. American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 2:164-168 2012.

  • MOTAGHIAN H.R. KARIMI A. MOHAMMADI J.: Analysis of spatial variability of specific physical and hydraulic properties of soil on a catchment scale. Journal of Water and Soil (Agricultural Sciences and Technologies) 22(2): 442-436 2007 (in Persian with English abstract).

  • MUBARAK I. ANGULO-JARAMILLO R. MAILHOL J.C. RUELLE P. KHALEDIAN M. VAUCLIN M.: Spatial analysis of soil surface hydraulic properties: Is infiltration method dependent? Agricultural Water Management 97:1517-1526 2010.

  • MULLA D.J. MCBRANTEY A.B.: Soil spatial variability. In M. E. Sumner (ed.) Handbook of Soil Science. CRC Press London pp. A321-A352 2002.

  • SOBIERAJ J.A. ELSENBEER H. CAMERON G.: Scale dependency in spatial patterns of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Catena 55:49-77 2004.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 314 191 11
PDF Downloads 221 127 9