Knowledge Management and Organizational Culture: An Exploratory Study

Open access


Purpose of the article Knowledge has been considered as the strategic assets and become the source of competitive advantage in organizations. Knowledge management thus receives the extraordinary attention from the top management. Many organizational factors have influences on knowledge management practices. This paper attempts to explore the empirical relationship between knowledge management and organizational culture in the specific situation of China’s commercial banking industry. Methodology/methods The relationship between knowledge management and organizational culture is quantitatively investigated by surveying bank managers. The scale of SECI modes is used to measure knowledge management process and the scale of Denison Organizational Culture Survey (DOCS) is used to measure organizational culture. We explore the underlying relationship by employing the statistical analyses such as correlation, regression and structural equation modeling. Scientific aim The research aims at testing the relationship between knowledge management and organizational culture, and furthermore if there exist linkages between cultural traits and SECI modes. Findings The results of the empirical study confirm the great and positive effect that organizational culture has on knowledge management. Different cultural traits contribute to different SECI modes. Conclusions For obtaining successful knowledge management practices in organizations, it is better to concern about the relationship between knowledge management and organizational culture. The limitation in the paper is the sampling size, which will be solved by an industry-wide survey in our future research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Armistead C. (1999). Knowledge management and process performance. Journal of Knowledge Management 3(2) 143-157.

  • Barney J. B. (1986). Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? The Academy of Management Review Vol. 11 No. 3 pp. 656-665 Jul. 1986.

  • Bellou V. (2010). Organizational culture as a predictor of job satisfaction: the role of gender and age. Career Development International Vol. 15 No.1 pp. 4 - 19.

  • Besanko D. Dranove D. Shanley M. (1996). The Economics of Strategy. John Wiley.

  • Cardoso L. Meireles A. & Peralta C. F. (2012). Knowledge management and its critical factors in social economy organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management 16(2) 267-284.

  • Davenport T. H. & Prusak L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.

  • Davenport T. H. De Long D. W. & Beers M. C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan management review 39(2) 43-57.

  • Denison D. R. Mishra A. K. (1995). Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness. Organization Science Vol. 6 No. 2 pp. 204-223.

  • Drucker P. F. (1999). Knowledge-worker productivity. California management review 41(2)

  • Fey C. F Denison D. R. (2003). Organizational Culture and Effectiveness: Can American Theory Be Applied in Russia? Organization Science Vol. 14 No. 6 pp. 686-706.

  • Gefen D. Straub D. W. & Boudreau M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4(7) 1-76.

  • Grant R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal 17 109-122.

  • Hansen M. T. Nohria N. & Tierney T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Bussiness Review 106-116 (March).

  • Hazlett S. A. McAdam R. & Gallagher S. (2005). Theory building in knowledge management in search of paradigms. Journal of Management Inquiry 14(1) 31-42.

  • Janáková H. (2012). Creative Management and Innovation. Creative and Knowledge Society Vol. 2 No. 1 95-112.

  • Janz B. D. & Prasarnphanich P. (2003). Understanding the Antecedents of Effective Knowledge Management: The Importance of a Knowledge-Centered Culture. Decision sciences 34(2) 351-384.

  • Kogut B. & Zander U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization science 3(3) 383-397.

  • Lim T. (2010). Relationships among organizational commitment job satisfaction and learning organization culture in one Korean private organization. Asia Pacific Education Review (2010) 11:311-320.

  • Magnier-Watanabe R. Benton C. & Senoo D. (2011). A study of knowledge management enablers across countries. Knowledge management research & practice 9(1) 17-28.

  • Martin J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: three perspectives. Oxford University Press New York

  • Martin J. (1992). Cultures in organizations: three perspectives. Oxford University Press New York

  • Meyer J. P. & Allen N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational Meyer J. P. Stanley D. J. Herscovitch L. & Topolnytsky L. (2002). Affective continuance and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior 61 20-52.

  • Meyer J. P. Stanley L. J. & Parfyonova N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implications of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior 80 1-16.

  • Mueller J. (2012). The interactive relationship of corporate culture and knowledge management: a review. Review of Managerial Science 6(2) 183-201.

  • Nonaka I. & Takeuchi H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press New York.

  • Nonaka I. Toyama R. & Konno N. (2000). SECI Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long range planning 33(1) 5-34.

  • Nonaka I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Bussiness Review 96-104 (Nov-Dec).

  • Nonaka I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5(1) 14-37.

  • Pinho I. Rego A. & e Cunha M. P. (2012). Improving knowledge management processes: a hybrid positive approach. Journal of Knowledge Management 16(2) 215-242.

  • Polanyi M. (1983). The tacit dimension (pp. 21-25). Gloucester MA: Peter Smith.

  • PrahaladC. K. & Hamel G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard business review 68 79-93.

  • Rego A. Pinho I. Pedrosa J. & Cunha M. P. (2009). Barriers and facilitators to knowledge management in university research centers: an exploratory study. Management Research 7(1) 33-47.

  • Riera C. G. Senoo D. & Iijima J. (2009). A study of the effect of knowledge creating capabilities on corporate performance. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies 3(1) 116-133.

  • Rowley J. (2001). Knowledge management in pursuit of learning: the learning with Schein E. H. (1996). Culture: The Missing Concept in Organization Studies. Administrative Science Quarterly Vol. 41 No. 2 40th Anniversary Issue pp. 229-240.

  • Spreitzer G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal 38(5) 1442-1465.

  • Tseng F. C. & Fan Y. J. (2011). Exploring the influence of organizational ethical climate on knowledge management. Journal of business ethics 101(2) 325-342.

  • Weiss D. J. Dawis R. V. England G. W. & Lofquist L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis MN: Work Adjustment Project of the University of Minnesota.

  • Xu F. & Rickards T. (2007). Creative management: A predicted development from research into creativity and management. Creativity and Innovation Management 16(3) 216-228.

  • Zheng W. Yang B. & McLean G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture structure strategy and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research 63(7) 763-771.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 546 164 6
PDF Downloads 336 125 4