Note-taking and Notability: How to Succeed at Legal Doctoral Fieldwork

Open access

Abstract

Fieldwork is the bridge between academia and practice. Often, this bridge is not crossed due to lack of guidance, time and practical experience. Academics are left on their own to guess what would work best. In facilitating this, this article assesses the methods used in a case study of doctoral fieldwork at the European Parliament within the civil service. Findings include identifying optimum methods to plan, develop and execute doctoral fieldwork.

This research is structured in four parts, which covers a literature review on fieldwork in the social sciences, the case study, the methodologies used, and a problem-solving section giving tips to succeed at fieldwork. Findings include a selection of methodologies which include participant observation and note-taking. These methodologies assist in improving skills such as time management, working under high pressure and delivering quality reports with attention to detail, which are fundamental for a successful academic career.

The experience covered in this article will assist academics in designing their fieldworks at all levels of their careers. The methods described are transferrable to fieldworks across legal, political and policy-making institutions.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amit V. 2004. Constructing the field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World. London: Routledge.

  • Bickman L. and Rog D.J. 2009. Applied Research Design: A Practical Approach. In: Bickman L. and Rog D.J. eds. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage. pp. 3-43.

  • Chynoweth P. 2008. Legal Research. In: Knight A. and Ruddock L. eds. Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 28-38.

  • City University Law School 2015. Writing a Successful PhD Proposal City University Law School [online]. Available at: <https://www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/87820/

  • Writing-a-Successful-PhD-Proposal-Guidance-Notes.pdf> [accessed 27 July 2018].

  • Cryer R. and Hervey T. and Sokhi-Bulley B. 2011. Research Methodologies in EU and International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

  • Eisenberg T. 2011. The Origins Nature and Promise of Empirical Legal Studies and a Response to Concerns. U Ill L Rev 2011(5): 1713-38.

  • Eraut M. 2004. Informal Learning in the Workplace. Studies in Continuing Education 26(2): 247-73.

  • Feldman D. 2013. Law in Politics Politics in Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

  • Fetterman D.M. 2009. Ethnography. In: Bickman L. and Rog D.J. eds. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage. pp. 543-88.

  • Gubrium J.F. and Holstein J.A. 2013. Analytic Inspiration in Ethnographic Fieldwork. In: Flick U. ed The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage. pp. 35-48.

  • Guest G. Namey E.E. and Mitchell M.L. 2013. Collecting Qualitative Data: A Field Manual for Applied Research. London: Sage.

  • Kent M. Gilbertson D.D. and Hunt C.O. 1997. Fieldwork in Geography Teaching: A Critical Review of the Literature and Approaches. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 21(3). pp. 313-32.

  • Kritzer H.M. 2009. Empirical Legal Studies Before 1940: A Bibliographic Essay. J Empirical Legal Studies 6(1): 925.

  • Mackor A.R. 2013. Explanatory Non-Normative Legal Doctrine. Taking the Distinction between Theoretical and Practical Reason Seriously. In: Van Hoecke M. ed. Methodologies of Legal Research. Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? Oxford: Hart Publishing.

  • Marvasti A.B. 2013. Analysing Observations. In: Flick U. ed. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage. pp. 354-66.

  • Nard C.A. 1995. Empirical Legal Scholarship: Restablishing a Dialogue between the Academy and Profession. Wake Forest Law Review 30(1): 347-68.

  • Partington M. 2010. Empirical Legal Research and Policy-Making. In: Cane P. and Kritzer H.M. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Smith M. 2010. Centralised Enforcement Legitimacy and Good Governance in the EU. London: Routledge.

  • Snyder F. 1994. Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community. In: Martin S. ed. The construction of Europe: essays in honour of Emile Noël. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Van Hoecke M. 2013. Methodologies of Legal Research. Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? Oxford: Hart Publishing.

  • Yin R.K. 2009. How to Do Better Case Studies (with Illustrations from 20 Exemplary Case Studies). In: Bickman L. and Rog D.J. eds. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: Sage. pp. 254-82.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.114
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.418

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 175 140 4
PDF Downloads 100 81 4