Stability, Ambiguity and Change in the Discourses of NATO allies in the Black Sea region: The Cases of Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey

Open access


Shortly after the Crimea crisis of March 2014, NATO started a process of strategic reflection and a series of actions under the umbrella of the ‘Pivot to East’. On the South of its Eastern flank, the Black Sea region looms as one of the most unstable areas, with a number of frozen conflicts in non-NATO countries as well as an increasing unrest overall. This article explores the political discourses, commitments and attitudes towards NATO of the three allies at the Black Sea, namely Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey, as well as exploring their role in regional security. The purpose of the research is to compare NATO’s representation in the mainstream politics of these countries. Based on discourse analysis and the comparative method, the paper examines to what extent stability, ambiguity and change are present in the Southeast allies’ discourses on NATO.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ascherson N. 2007. Black Sea: Coasts and Conquests: From Pericles to Putin: The Birthplace of Civilisation and Barbarism. London: Vintage.

  • Bershidsky L. 2017. Turkey’s Troubled NATO Status. Bloomberg View 14 March [online]. Available at: (Accessed May 2017).

  • Buzan B. 1991. People States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Second edition Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Cheresheva M. 2017. NATO Black Sea Plans Cause Dissent in Bulgaria. BalkanInsight 22 February [online]. Available at: (Accessed April 2017).

  • Emmott R. 2016. Exclusive: Turkey purges NATO military envoys after failed coup. Reuters 12 October [online]. Available at: (Accessed February 2017).

  • Emmott R. 2017. Turkey’s EU dream is over for now top official says. Reuters 2 May [online]. Available at: (Accessed May 2017).

  • Erlanger S. and Meyers S. 2008. NATO Allies Oppose Bush on Georgia and Ukraine. The New York Times 3 April [online]. Available at: (Accessed February 2017).

  • Euronews 2016. Pro-Russia candidate wins Bulgarian presidential runoff.

  • Euronews 13 November [online]. Available at: (Accessed February 2017).

  • Franc-Ioan V. 2000. Din lucrările Comisiei de la Snagov - martie-iunie 1995. Bucharest: Centre for Information and Economic Documentation.

  • Hannah J. 2016. How Do You Solve a Problem Like Erdogan?. Foreign Policy 15 June [online]. Available at: (Accessed May 2017).

  • Hurriyet Daily News 2017. Merkel rules out Turkish vote in Germany on death penalty. Hurriyet Daily News 9 May [online]. Available at: (Accessed May 2017).

  • Kaplan D. R. 2014. The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate. Bucharest: Litera.

  • King C. 2004. The Black Sea: A History. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Klemm H. 2017. On Naval Cooperation of the NATO Black Sea Allies. In: Valentin N. ed. The Crisis of the European Union and the Global Order in the Trump Era. Bucharest: Trei Publishing House. pp. 60-66.

  • Luciani G. 1989. The economic content of security. Journal of Public Policy 8(2): 151-173.

  • Mayer S. ed. 2014. NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics. The Changing Provisions of Security. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Bulgaria 2017. Bulgaria in NATO. [online] Available at: (Accessed February 2017).

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Romania 2017. Romania-NATO. [online] Available at: (Accessed February 2017).

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Turkey 2017. Turkey’s relations with NATO. [online] Available at: (Accessed March 2017).

  • Mitrovici E. and Diac M. 2016. The Bulgarian Prime Minister opposes to the Black Sea flotilla. President Iohannis insists it is a good idea. România Liberă 16 June [online]. Available at: (Accessed May 2017).

  • National Defence College of Canada 1989. Course documents. Kingston: National Defence College Publishing.

  • Novinite 2017. Bulgaria Other 3 NATO States Picked Russia to Defend Them If Threatened. Novinite 19 February [online]. Available at: (Accessed April 2017).

  • Pamuk H. 2016. Turkey’s Erdogan call on NATO to do more on fighting militant attacks. Reuters 8 July [online]. Available at: (Accessed May 2017).

  • Petersson M. 2015. The US NATO Debate: From Libya to Ukraine. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

  • Posirca O. 2017. President Iohannis: Romania has the biggest pro- American sentiment in the EU. Business Review 8 June [online]. Available at: (Accessed June 2017).

  • Schmidt G. 2014. From London to Brussels: Emergence and Development of a Politico-Administrative System. In: Mayer S. ed. NATO’s Post-Cold War Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 31-49.

  • Thies W. 2009. Why NATO Endures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Trager F. N. and Simonie F. 1973. An Introduction to the Study of National Security. In: Trager F. N. and Kronenberg P. S. National Security and American Society: Theory Process and Policy. Kansas: University Press of Kansas. pp. 33-51.

  • Tsygankov A. 2009. Russophobia: Anti-Russian Lobby and American Foreign Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Weiss S. 2016. It’s Time to Kick Erdoğan’s Turkey Out of NATO. Huffington Post [online]. Available at: (Accessed May 2017).

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.114
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.418

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 316 108 2
PDF Downloads 218 96 0