International Security Presence in Kosovo and its Human Rights Implications

Open access

Abstract

In this article I will examine the powers and activities of NATO-led Kosovo forces (KFOR) and their impact on human rights protection in Kosovo. Through this examination, I seek to answer the following questions: which KFOR actions affected the human rights of Kosovars? Does KFOR carry out responsibilities and abide by the obligations normally imposed upon nation-states? And is there a solution available when the alleged violator is KFOR? KFOR is responsible for carrying out military tasks and for ‘shouldering’ UNMIK and local security forces in some civilian peace-building tasks. In the course of the exercise of its mandate, there were alleged complaints of human rights violations by KFOR. The legal implications of these alleged complaints against KFOR (in)actions will also be discussed.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abdullah Öcalan v. Turkey 2005. Application no. 46221/99 (ECtHR 12 May 2005).

  • Behrami v. France 2007. Agim Behrami and Bekir Behrami v. France. Application no. 71412/01 (ECtHR 2 May 2007).

  • Al-Skeini and Others (Respondents) v. Secretary of State for Defence (Appellant). Al-Skeini and Others (Appellants) v. Secretary of State for Defence (Respondent) (Consolidated Appeals) 2007. UKHL 26 United Kingdom: House of Lords (Judicial Committee) 13 June [online]. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/casesGBR_HL4672880a2.html (Accessed 1 September 2017).

  • Amnesty International 2000. Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Kosovo): setting the standard? UNMIK and KFOR’s response to the violence in Mitrovica. [pdf]. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/140000/eur700132000en.pdf (Accessed 23 August 2017). Amnesty International 2004a. Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina: the apparent lack of accountability of international peacekeeping forces in Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina. 21 March [online]. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur05/002/2004/en/ (Accessed 25 June 2017).

  • Amnesty International 2004b. Serbia and Montenegro (Kosovo/Kosova): The March violence: KFOR and UNMIK’s failure to protect the right of the minority communities. [online]. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/search/ (Accessed 5 July 2017).

  • Banković and others v. Belgium 2007. Application no. 52207/99 (ECtHR 19 December 2007).

  • Benedek W. 2005. Final status of Kosovo: the role of human rights and minority rights. Chicago-Kent Law Review 80(1): 215-233

  • Burgos/Delia Saldias de Lopez v. Uruguay 29 July 1981. Communication No.52/1979 UN Doc. CCPR/C/OP1.

  • Cerone J. 2001. Minding the Gap: Outlining KFOR Accountability in Postconflict Kosovo. European Journal of International Law 12(3): 469-488.

  • Cerone J. 2002. Outlining KFOR Accountability in Post-Conflict Kosovo. American Society for International Law 5(15) [online]. Available at: https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/5/issue/15/outlining-kforaccountability-post-conflict-kosovo (Accessed 28 September 2017).

  • Cerone J. 2006. Out of bounds? Considering the reach of international human rights law. Centre for Human Rights and Global Justice Working Paper 5 [pdf]. Available at: http://chrgj.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/WPS_NYU_CHRGJ_Cerone_Final.pdf (Accessed 28 June 2017).

  • Clapham A. 2006. Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • CNN 1999. G-8 countries endorse Kosovo plan. [online]. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/WORLD/europe/9905/06/kosovo.05/index.html?iref=storysearch (Accessed 25 June 2017).

  • Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights 2001. Lawless areas within the territory of Council of Europe Member States (Doc.8993 8 March 2001). Rapporteur: Mr Pourgourdes [online]. Available at: https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/X2H-Xref-ViewHTML.asp?FileID=9212&lang=EN (Accessed 23 August 2017).

  • Council of Europe 2002. Office of the Commissioner for Human Rights Kosovo: the human rights situation and the fate of persons displaced from their homes. Report by Mr. Alvaro Gil-Robles Commissioner for Human Rights Strasbourg 16 October 2002 [pdf]. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/415971228.pdf (Accessed 5 July 2017).

  • Council of Europe 1950. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14 Strasbourg 4 November 1950 ETS 5 [online]. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3b04.html (Accessed 3 October 2017).

  • Cyprus v. Turkey 2001. Application no. 25781/94 (ECtHR 10 May 2001).

  • Delia Saldias de Lopez v. Uruguay 1981. CCPR/C/13/D/52/1979 (United Nations Human Rights Committee).

  • De Wet E. 2004. Chapter VII powers of the United Nations Security Council. Oxford: Oxford Hart Press.

  • Direk F. O. 2015. Security detention in international territorial administrations: Kosovo East Timor and Iraq. Leiden: Boston Brill Njihoff.

  • Eccles E. H. 1965. Military concepts and philosophy. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press.

  • European Commission for Democracy through Law 2004. The human rights situation in Kosovo. Background information and issues for discussion. Strasbourg 4 June 2004. Opinion no. 280/2004.

  • European Parliament DG Information 2001. The library Subject Team on Foreign Affairs. COMCFOR Directive 42 9 October [pdf]. Available at: http://www.statewatch.org/cia/documents/Library-COMKFOR-2004-006.pdf (Accessed 5 July 2017).

  • Hafner G. 2005. The rule of law and international organizations. Berlin: Duncker & Haubalt.

  • Human Rights Watch 2004. Failure to protect anti-minority violence in Kosovo. March 2004 [online]. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2004/07/25/failure-protect/anti-minority-violence-kosovomarch-2004 (Accessed 5 July 2017).

  • International Court of Justice 1949. Reparation for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations. Advisory Opinion 1949 I.C.HJ. 174.

  • International Court of Justice 2004. Advisory opinion concerning legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian territory. [online]. Available at: http://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/131 (Accessed 25 August 2017).

  • International Crisis Group 2004. Collapse in Kosovo. Europe Report No. 155 22 April [pdf]. Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/28082/155_collapse_in_kosovo_revised.pdf (Accessed 5 July 2017).

  • International Law Commission 2011. Draft articles on the responsibility of international organizations [pdf]. Available at: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/9_11_2011.pdf (Accessed 23 August 2017).

  • Joseph P. E. 2003. Macedonia: the risks of complacency. Meeting Report 277 2003.

  • Knoll B. 2006. Beyond the mission civilisatrice: the properties of a normative order within an internationalized territory. Leiden Journal of International Law 19(2): 275-304.

  • Kouchner B. 2001. A first-hand perspective from Kosovo. In: Spillmann R. K. Bernauer T. Gabriel J. M. and Wenger A. eds. Peace support operations: lessons learned and future perspectives. Bern Berlin Bruxelles Frankfurt/M. New York Oxford Wien: Peter Lang. pp. 137-145.

  • Marshall D. and Inglis S. 2003. Human rights in transition: the disempowerment of human rights-based justice in the United Nations mission in Kosovo. Harvard Human Rights Journal 16(95): 95-146.

  • Military Technical Agreement 1999. Military technical agreement between the international security force (KFOR) and the governments of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Serbia. 9 June [online]. Available at: http://www.nato.int/kosovo/docu/a990609a.htm (Accessed 5 July 2017).

  • Murphy R. 2005. UN peacekeeping in Lebanon Somalia and Kosovo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe 2002. Department of Human Rights and Rule of Law Legal System Monitoring Section 2001-2002 24 January 2002 [online]. Available at: http://www.osce.org/kosovo/documents.html (Accessed 25 June 2017).

  • Reinhardt K. 2001. Lessons learned as commander KFOR in Kosovo. In: Spillmann R. K. Bernauer T. Gabriel J.M. and Wenger A. eds. Peace support operations: lessons learned and future perspectives. Bern Berlin Bruxelles Frankfurt/M. New York Oxford Wien: Peter Lang. pp. 147-154.

  • Saramati v. France Germany and Norway 2007. Application no. 78166/01 (ECtHR 2 May 2007).

  • Serbia and Montenegro v. France 2004. Aplication no. 29-4-1999 (International Court of Justice).

  • Spillmann R. K Bernauer T. Gabriel J. Wenger A. eds. 2001. Peace Support Operations: Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives. Bern Berlin Bruxelles Frankfurt/M. New York Oxford Wien: Peter Lang.

  • Stahn C. 2001. The United Nations transitional administrations in Kosovo and East Timor: a first analysis. In: Max Planck Y.B. of UN Law (2001)105.

  • Titina Loizidou v. Turkey 1995. Application no. 15318/89 (ECtHR 23 March 1995).

  • United Nations International Law Commission 2004. Special Rapporteur Second report on responsibility of international organizations. A/CN.4/541. (2 April 2004).

  • United Nations International Law Commission 2005. Report of the International Law Commission (ILC) fifty-seventh session. Commentary (2) on draft Article 13 on the responsibility of international organizations. 2 May- 3 June and 11 July-5 August 2005. UN Doc. A/CN.4.

  • United Nations Secretary General’s Report on the United Nations’ Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo 1999. UN Doc. S/1999/779.

  • United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations 2008. United Nations peacekeeping operations: principles and guidelines 68 (Capstone Doctrine). [pdf]. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/documents/capstone_eng.pdf (Accessed 25 June 2017).

  • United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations 2008. Department of Field Support Policy on Authority Command and Control in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Ref. 2008.4 Feb. 2008.

  • United Nations Human Rights Committee 2004. General comment No.31(80): nature of the general legal obligation imposed on state parties to the Covenant 26/05/2004. CCPR/C/21Rev.1/Add.13 (General Comments).

  • United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 10 June 1999.

  • United Nations Security Council Peace Plan 1999. Agreement on the principles to move towards a resolution of the Kosovo crisis presented to the leadership of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia by the President of Finland Martti Ahtisaari representing the European Union and Viktor Chernomyrdin Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation 3 June 1999. UN Doc. S/1999/649.

  • United Nations Security Council 2008. Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo 28 March 2008. UN Doc. S/2008/211

  • UNMIK Reg. 1999/24. Regulation no.1999/24 on the law applicable in Kosovo. 12 December 1999.

  • UNMIK Reg. 2000/47. Regulation No. 2000/47 on the status privileges and immunities of KFOR and UNMIK Personnel in Kosovo. 18 August 2000.

  • UNMIK Reg. 2000/59. Regulation no.2000/59 amending UNMIK Regulation no. 1999/24 on the law applicable in Kosovo. 27 October 2000.

  • UNMIK Reg. 2001/7. Regulation no. 2001/7 on the authorization of possession of weapons in Kosovo. 21 February 2001.

  • Youngs T. Oakes M. Bowers P. and Hillyard M. 1999. Kosovo: Operation Allied Force. Compiled for Members of Parliament (London UK: House of Commons Library 29 April 1999) Research Paper 99/48 [pdf]. Available at: http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP99-48/RP99-48.pdf (Accessed 23 August 2017).

  • Zwanenburg M. 2005. Accountability of peace support operations. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.114
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.418

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 739 408 7
PDF Downloads 191 104 6