Introduction. Neonatal anthropometric measurements, including body weight, length, head circumference and abdominal circumference are routine procedures in obstetric and neonatal departments. Standard values for neonatal population are established for body weight, length, head and thoracic circumference, however there are no reference values for neonatal abdominal circumference, futhermore, this measurement currently is not a routine procedure in every obstetric and neonatal unit. In order to evaluate the increase of abdominal circumference in newborns with a disease of organs of abdominal cavity including necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), the abdominal girth of newborns soon after birth without pathology in the abdominal cavity should be ascertained. Thereby, the average value of the abdominal circumference of newborns in Latvia could be obtained.
Aim of the Study. The aim of our study is to measure the abdominal circumference in premature and term-born neonates soon after birth and to define the correlation between abdominal circuit and birth weight.
Materials and Methods. The measurement of waist girth was carried out in 460 neonates within 30 minutes after birth. Newborns were divided into 4 groups according to birth weight: extremely low birth weight (ELBW) - under 1000 g, very low birth weight (VLBW) - 1001 g - 1500 g, low birth weight (LBW) - 1501 g - 2500 g and term neonates with 2501 g - 4590 g birth weight. The abdominal circumference was measured in 2 obstetric units in accordance with the previously established measurement methods.
Results. There was no statistical difference between abdominal circumference in boys and girls in ELBW, VLBW and LBW groups (p>0.05). Mean abdominal circumference in ELBW group was 18,70 cm (SD=0,84) in boys and 18,67 cm (SD=1,40) in girls, VLBW group was 22,20 cm (SD=1,42) and 21,94 cm (SD=1,29) in boys and girls, respectively. Mean abdominal circumference in LBW group was 24.47 cm (SD=2.36) in boys, and 24.92 cm (SD=2.23) in girls. Independent Samples Test: Mean abdominal circumference was statistically different in boys and girls in 2500g -4590g birth weight group with median value 30.56 cm in boys, and 33.23 cm in girls (p<0,05). Mean value in girls was 3.33 cm higher than in boys. Dependent Variable linear regression: Specific formula for estimation of normal abdominal circumference was developed as a result of this study: y=0.0044x+16.38 (y - abdominal circumference, cm; x - body weight, grams; 0.0044 - regression coefficient; 16.38 - regression constant).
Conclusions. The difference of mean abdominal circumference was not statistically significant in boys and girls in ELBW, VLBW and LBW groups, however, the difference was significant in the term-born neonates group. As a result of this study reference values and specific formula were established, which allows determination of normal abdominal circumference in neonates depending on birth weight.
1 Alves JG, Farias MP, Gazineu RM, Bandeira F, Menezes J, da Costa e Silva EJ. Waist Circumference and Mesenteric Fat in Neonates: Negative Correlation // Indian Journal Pediatriae, 2010; 77:1266 - 1269
2 Basavanthappa BT. Neonatal Nursing I: Nursing of Normal Newborn // Textbook of Midwifery & Reproductive Health Nursing, 2006; 443 - 446
3 Bhatia P, Johnson KJ, Bell EF. Variability of abdominal circumference of premature infants // Journal Pediatric Surgery, 1990 May;25(5):543 -544
4 Fletcher MA. Assesement of Size and Growth // Physical diagnosis in Neonatology. Philadelphia: Lipincott - Raven Publishers, 1998. - Pp. 37 - 50
5 Fok TF, Hon KL, Wong E, Ng PC, So HK, Lau J et al. Trunk anthropometry of Hong Kong Chinese infants // Early Human Development, 2005; 81: 781-790
6 Guner YS, Chokchi N, Petrosyan M et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis - bench to bedside: novel and emerging strategies // Seminars in Pediatric Surgery, 2008; 17:255 - 265
7 Higgns VR, Comuzzie AG. Measures of Waist Circumference // Preedy VR Handbook of Anthropometry: Physical Measures of Human Form in Health and Disease, Vol. 1, Parts 1-6, London: Springer, 2012. - Pp. 881 - 890
9 Johnson TS, Engstrom JL. State of the Science in Measurement of Infant Size at Birth // Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews, 2 (3), 2002; Pp. 150 -158
10 Manogura AC, Turan O, Kush ML, Berg C, Bhide A, Turan S. et al. Predictors of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm growth-restricted neonates // American Journal Obstetric Gynecology, 2008;198: 6381 -6385
11 Melamed N, Ben-Haroush A, Meizner I et al. Accuracy of sonographic weight estimation as a function of fetal sex // Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011; 38: 67-73
12 Mihatsch WA, Högel J, Pohlandt F. The abdominal circumference to weight ratio increases with decreasing body weight in preterm infants // Acta Pediatrie, 2004; 93:273 - 274
13 „National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Antropometry Procedures Manual”, January 2007; 3-15 - 3-16
14 January 2007; 3-15 - 3-16
15 Padoan A, Rigano S, Ferazzi E et al. Differences in fat and lean mass proportions in normal and normal and growt restricted fetuses // American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004; 191: 1459 - 1464
16 Routine examination of the newborn. Position statement of the Fetus and Newborn Committee of the Paediatric Society of New Zealand // New Zealand Medicinae Journal, 2000 Aug 25;113(1116):361 - 363
17 Schmelzle HR, Quang DN, Fusch G, Fusch C. Birth weight categorization according to gestational age does not reflect percentage body fat in term and preterm newborns // Europian Journal Pediatriae, 2007; 166:161 - 167
18 Sarris I, Ioannou C, Dighe M et al. Standartization of fetal biometric measurements: improving the quality and consistency of measurements // Ultrasound Obstet Gynecology, 2011; 38: 681 - 687
19 White L. Foundation of Maternal and Pediatric Nursing // Basic of Pediatric Care, 2011; Pp. 166 -168
20 West J, Manchester B, Wright J, Lawlor DA, Waiblinger D. Reliability of routine clinical measurements of neonatal circumferences and research // Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 25, 164 - 171 21 Yajnik CS, Fall CHD, Coyaji KJ, Hirve SS, Rao S, Berker DJP et al, Neonatal anthropometry: the thin-fat Indian baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study // International Journal of Obesity, 2003; 27: 173-180