Yield Potentiality of Maize as Relay Crop with T. Aman Rice under Different Agronomic Management

Open access


The experiment was conducted at the Regional Agricultural Research Station, BARI, Ishwardi, Pabna, Bangladesh, during 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 to introduce maize as relay crop with T. Aman rice under different agronomic practices for determine the production potentials. The experiment was design split plot with three replications. The agronomic management practices included four plant spacing viz. S1=75 cm×20 cm (66666 plants/ha), S2=60 cm×20 cm (83333 plants/ha), S3=50 cm×20 cm (100000 plants/ha) and S4=40 cm×20 cm (125000 plants/ha) and four soil management practices viz. M1=soil mulching at 25 DAE, M2=earthing up at 25 DAE, M3=straw mulching at 25 DAE and M4= without earthing up and mulching (control). Seeds were relayed by dibbling manually in 10 days before the harvest of T. Aman rice. Results showed that an increasing plant spacing increased leaf area Index (LAI), total dry matter (TDM), crop growth rate (CGR) and light energy interception (LEI). Grain yield was higher in S3 spacing (8.44 t/ha) than others (S4 8.11 t/ha, S2 7.34 t/ha and S1 6.89 t/ha). Among the soil management practices, M2 increased LAI, TDM, CGR, LEI as well as grain yield. Moreover, M2 and M1 gave similar grain yield (8.22 t/ha and 8.02 t/ha), that were significantly greater than other two soil management practices (M3 7.55 t/ha and M4 6.98 t/ha). From the economic point of view, combination of S3M1 gave better performance with gross margin of Tk. 95000/ha and BCR of 2.17. On the basis of results, S3M1 combination was suitable for growing maize under relay sowing with T. Aman rice.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ahmed F. Islam M.N. Rahman M.T. Jahan M.A. & Khan M.S.A. (2010). Leaf area index radiation interception dry matter production and grain yield of hybrid maize as influenced by plant spacing. Bangladesh Agron.J. 13(1&2):51-58

  • Ali M.Y. (2006). Rice-maize systems in Bangladesh. Invited oral presentation in the workshop on Assessing the Potential of Rice-Maize Systems in Asia. IRRICIMMYT Alliance Program for Intensive Production Systems in Asia held 4-8 December 2006 IRRI Los Baños Philippines.

  • Andrade H.F. Otegui M.E. & Vega C. (2000). Intercepted radiation at flowering and kernel number in maize. Agron. J. 92: 92-97

  • Beadle C.L. (1987). Plant growth analysis. In: Coomlos J.D.O. S.P. Long and J.M.O. Scurlock (Eds.). Techniques in Bioproductivity and Photosynthesis 2nd Ed. pp: 21-23. Pergamon press Oxford New York.

  • Barbieri P.A. Rozas H.R.S. Andrade F.H. & Echeverria H.E. (2000). Row spacing effects at different levels of nitrogen availability in maize. Agron. J. 92: 283-288.

  • Bavec F. & Bavec M. (2002). Effect of plant population on leaf area index cob characteristics and grain yield of early maturing maize cultivers (FAO 100-400). Eur. J. Agron. 16:151-159.

  • Charles-Edwards D.A. (1982). Physiological determinants of crop growth. Academic Press Sydney.

  • Diaz-Zorita M. (2000). Effect of deeptillage and nitrogen fertilization interactions on dryland corn (Zea mays L.) productivity. Soil Till. Res. 142(1-2): 11-19.

  • Dreccer M.F. et al. (2000). Radiation and nitrogen use at the leaf and canopy level by wheat and oilseed rape during the critical period for grain number definition. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27(10) 899-910.

  • Dwyer L.M. & Stewart D.W. (1986). Leaf area development in field-grown maize. Agron. J. 78:334-343.

  • Farnham D.E. (2001). Row spacing plant density and hybrid effects on corn grain yield and moisture. Agron. J. 93:1049-1053.

  • Flent F. Kiniry J.R. Board J.E. Westgate M.E. & Reicosky D.C. (1996). Row spacing effects on light extinction coefficients of corn sorghum soybean and sunflower. Agron. J. 88: 185-190.

  • Gokmen S. Sencar O. & Sakin M.A. (2001). Response of popcorn (Zea mays everta) to nitrogen rats and plant densities. Turk. J. Agric. For. 25:15-23.

  • Jabbar A. Ahmad R. Ullah E. & Nazir M.S. (2005). Agro-economic performance of diversified ricebased relay cropping system at zero and conventional tillage under strip plantation. Pakistan J. Agric. Sci. 12: 18-21.

  • Kayode J. & Ademiluyi B. (2004). Effect of tillage methods on weed control and maize performance in Southwestern Nigeria location. J. Sustainable Agric. 23(3): 39-45.

  • Khurshid K. Iqbal M. Arif M.S. & Nawaz A. (2006). Effect of tillage and mulch on soil physical properties and growth of maize. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 8 (5): 593-596.

  • Konuskan O. (2000). Effects of plant density on yield and yield-related characters of some maize hybrids grown in hatay conditions as second crop. M.Sc. Thesis Science Institute M. K. U. p.71.

  • Lindquist J.L. Mortensen D.A. & Johnson B.E. (1998). Machanism of corn tolerance and velfet leaf suppressive ability. Agron J. 90 787-792.

  • Maddonni G.A. & Otegui M.E. (2004). Intra-specific competition in maize:Early establishment of hierarchies among plant affects final kernel set. Field Crop Res. 85: 1-13.

  • Mashingaidze A.B. (2004). Improving weed management and crop productivity in maize systems in Zimbabwe. PhD Thesis Wageningen University The Netherlands p. 196.

  • Maqbool M.M. Tanveer A. Ata Z. & Ahmad R. (2006). Growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by row spacing and weed competition durations. Pak. J. Bot. 38(4): 1227-1236

  • Malik V.S. Swanton C.J. Michaels T.E. (1993). Interaction of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars row spacing and seeding density with annual weeds. Weed Sci. 41: 62-68.

  • Malik M.A. Saleem M.F. Sana M. & Aziz A. (2002). Agro-economic expression of different relay crops after rice harvest under conventional and zero tillage. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 4: 277-278.

  • Paszkiewicz S. (1998). Narrow row width influence on corn yield. Pioneer Hi-Bred International www.pioneer.com/usa/crop_management/national/narrowrow.htm.

  • Porter P.M. Hicks D.R. Lueschen W.E. Ford J.H. Warnes D.D. & Hovenstad T.R. (1997). Corn response to row width and plant density in the Northern Corn Belt. J. Prod. Agric. 10:293-300.

  • Roth G.W. (1997). Potential of narrow row corn production in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania State University. Agronomy Fact 52.

  • Saleem M.F. Shah S.H. Malik M.A. & Munir M.K. (2000). Bio-economics of different upland rice-based intercropping systems under strip plantation. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2: 294-296.

  • Stone P.J. Pearson A.J. Sorensen I.B. & Rogers B.T. (2000). Effect of row spacing and plant population on maize yield and quality. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Agronomy Society of New Zealand Palmerston North New Zealand Agronomy N.Z. 30:67-75.

  • Tetio-Kagho F. & Gardner F.P. (1988). Responses of maize to plant population density: II. Reproductive development yield and yield adjustments. Agronomy J. 80: 935-940.

  • Tollenaar M. & Wu J. (19990 - Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Sci. 39: 1597-1604.

  • Turgut I. (2000). Effects of plant populations and nitrogen doses on fresh ear yield and yield components of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.) grown under Bursa conditions. Turk. J. Agric. For. 24:341-347.

  • Videnović Ž. Simić M. Srdić J. & Umanović Z. (2011). Long term effects of different soil tillage systems on maize (Zea mays L.) yields. Plant Soil Environ. 57 (4): 186-192.

  • Widdicombe W.D. & Thelen K.D. (2002). Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the northern Corn Belt. Agron. J. 94:1020-1023.

  • Yusuf Ali M. Waddington S.R. Timsina J. Hodson D. & Dixon J. (2009). Maize-rice cropping systems in Bangladesh: Status and research needs. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. USA 3(6):35-53 (Serial No.19).

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 167 57 6
PDF Downloads 90 38 3