Determinants of the Issuance of Put/Call Convertibles in the Non-Financial Sector of the US Market

Open access


The aim of this article is to characterize and show the differences between issuers of ordinary convertibles and convertibles with attached put/call provisions (put/call convertibles). The research was carried out on a sample of 379 firms in the US market, outside the financial sector, between 2002 and 2011. It turns out that the issuers of put/call convertibles are the companies with a higher risk exposure, associated with, inter alia, a higher level of indebtedness and worse ratio between the issue value to the fixed assets value. Adding the put/call provisions is aimed at decreasing issuers’ risk exposure, which may increase the market demand for this type of convertible securities

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Asquith P. Mullins D. (1990) Convertible Debt: Corporate Call Policy and Voluntary Conversion ‘The Journal of Finance’ no. 46(4)

  • Brennan M. Kraus A. (1987) Efficient Financing under Asymmetric Information ‘Journal of Finance’ no. 42(5)

  • Brennan M. Schwartz E. (1977) Convertible Bonds: Valuation and Optimal Strategies for Call and Conversion ‘The Journal of Finance’ no. 32(5)

  • Brennan M. Schwartz E. (1988) The Case for Convertibles ‘Journal of Applied Corporate Finance’ no. 1(2)

  • Brigham E. (1966) An Analysis Of Convertible Debentures: Theory And Some Empirical Evidence ‘Journal of Finance’ no. 21(1)

  • Chemmanur T. Simonyan K. (2010) What Drives the Issuance of Putable Convertibles: Risk- Shifting Asymmetric Information or Taxes? ‘Financial Management’ no. 39(3)

  • Constantinides G. Grundy B. (1989) Optimal Investment with Stock Repurchase and Financing as Signals ‘Review of Financial Studies’ no. 2(4)

  • Green R. (1984) Investment Incentives Debt and Warrants ‘Journal of Financial Economics’ no. 13(1)

  • Greiner D. Kalay A. Kato H. K. (2002) The Market for Callable-Convertible Bonds: Evidence from Japan ‘Pacific-Basin Finance Journal’ no. 10

  • Harris M. Raviv A. (1985) A Sequential Signalling Model of Convertible Debt Call Policy ‘The Journal of Finance’ no. 40(5)

  • Ingersoll E. (1977) A Contingent-Claims Valuation of Convertible Securities ‘Journal of Financial Economics’ no. 4(3)

  • Ingersoll E. (1977) An Examination of Corporate Call Policies on Convertible Securities ‘Journal of Finance’ no. 32(2)

  • Isagawa N. (2002) Callable Convertible Debt Under Managerial Entrenchment ‘Journal of Corporate Finance’ no. 8

  • Isagawa N. Convertible Debt: an Effective Financial Instrument to Control Managerial Opportunism ‘Review of Financial Economics’ no. 9(1)

  • Jaffee D. Shleifer A. (1990) Costs Of Financial Distress Delayed Calls Of Convertible Bonds And The Role Of Investment Banks ‘Journal of Business no. 63(1)

  • Jalan P. Barone-Adesi G. (1995) Equity Financing and Corporate Convertible Bond Policy ‘Journal of Banking and Finance’ no. 19(2)

  • Jensen M. Meckling W. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior Agency Costs and Ownership Structure ‘Journal of Financial Economics’ no. 3(4)

  • Kim Y. (1990) Informative Conversion Ratios: A Signalling Approach Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis no. 25(2)

  • Lewis C. Rogalski R. Seward J. (2001) The Long-Run Performance of Firms That Issue Convertible Debt: an Empirical Analysis of Operating Characteristics and Analyst Forecasts ‘Journal of Corporate Finance’ no. 7(4)

  • Mayers D. (2000) Convertible Bonds: Matching Financial and Real Options ‘Journal of Applied Corporate Finance’ no. 13(1)

  • Modigliani F. Merton M. (1958) The Cost of Capital Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment ‘American Economic Review’ no. 48(3)

  • Myers S. Majluf N. (1984) Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have ‘Journal of Financial Economics’ no. 13

  • Stein J. (1992) Convertible bonds as backdoor equity financing ‘Journal of Financial Economics’ no. 32(1) Szymczak W. (2010) Podstawy statystyki dla psychologów Difin Warszawa

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.46

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.241
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.366

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 122 65 5
PDF Downloads 67 48 8