Consequences of Fiscal Adjustment and Public Finance Management. The Costs of Limiting the Fiscal Imbalance in Eurozone Countries

Marta Postuła 1  and Jacek Tomkiewicz 2
  • 1 Head of Department of Financial Management in Organisation, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management
  • 2 Economics Department, Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland


This article focuses on the effects of corrections to the budgetary policy in eurozone economies. The goal of the text is to check if advancement in implementing modern tools of public management is helpful in the time of fiscal adjustment. We assume that the most important role of a performance approach in conducting fiscal policy is the ability of government to implement active policy meant as structural changes in the composition of public expenditures. In the case of the need to cut general levels of public spending, public sector managers who have knowledge of performance effects of public policies should be able to conduct fiscal adjustment in such a way as to minimise negative outcomes of spending correction on society. The structure of the text is as follows. First, we present some insights on the economic effects of fiscal adjustment. Then, we discuss the concept of performance management presented in the theory and policy agendas of international institutions such as the European Union or the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Finally, we present the result of an empirical exercise that is designed to combine the level of advancement in implementing performance budgeting (PB) and the social cost of fiscal adjustment in eurozone economies. The most important finding of the research is that PB tools seem to have very limited usefulness in a time of fiscal adjustment. There is no statistical evidence that countries advanced in utilisation of PB tools conduct more active fiscal policy – approach of cutting all expenditures across the border by given percentage rather than looking at priorities and social outcomes of fiscal adjustment dominates in all cases.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Greene, W. H., Econometric Analysis (seventh ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, New York University 2012.

  • Alesina A., Perotti R., Tavares J., The Political Economy of Fiscal Adjustments, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1:1998.

  • Cangiano M., Lazare M.; Curristine T., Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture, IMF, Washington 2013.

  • Dell’Erba, Mattina, Roitman., Pressure or Prudence? Tales of Market Pressure and Fiscal Adjustment, IMF Working Paper WP/13/170, Washington 2013.

  • Eisenkopf G., Negative Weights for Performance Measures, International Public Management Journal, 12:3, 332-344, 2009

  • European Commission, European Union Public Finance: New book edition released, Brussels 2015.

  • IMF, Fiscal Monitor, Washington 2012 and 2013.

  • Kelly, J., Rubin, M., Budget and Accounting Reforms. In Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. and Pollitt, C. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, (pp. 563-590). 2005 New York.

  • Maarten de Jong, Iris van Beek and Rense Posthumus, Introducing accountable budgeting: lessons from a decade of performance-based budgeting in the Netherlands, OECD Journal on Budgeting Volume 2012/3.

  • Nuti M., Polityka oszczędnościowa a rozwój, w: Kołodko G.W., (red.) Zarządzanie i polityka gospodarcza dla rozwoju, Poltext, Warszawa 2014.

  • Perotti R., The “Austerity Myth”: Gain Without Pain?, BIS Working Paper 362, 2011


  • Tanzi V., Realistic Recovery Why Keynesian Solutions Will Not Work, Politeia 2012

  • Utz H., Better Performance with PB? Analyzing Cases of Success and Failure in Public Administrations, International Public Management Journal, 13:4, 408-428, 2010

  • Weber A., Stock-Flow Adjustments and Fiscal Transparency: A Cross-Country Comparison, IMF Working Paper, WP/12/39, 2012.

  • Welfe W., Ekonometria. Metody i ich zastosowanie, PWE, Warsaw 2014


Journal + Issues