Education in the Anticommons: Evidence from Romania

Open access


The process of administrative decentralization of the education system in Romania proceeded in chaotic steps. It was done under the pressure, on one hand, of the EU integration requirements and, on the other hand, of the local administrations who wanted more control over how their money were used in the schools and of the parents committees that wanted to have a say in the local schools. The road was scattered with new reform legislations coming with every change in government composition and ministers. The result was a combination of local autonomy and central control that had the potential to produce confusion and conflict. The multiple and complex blend of divided responsibilities and powers turned out in the process of setting up the new form or entry grade in the Romanian primary education cycle in a rational strategic play scholarly designated as anticommons. Each separated actor tries to obtain a maximizing share of the cooperatively generated benefit for a minimum possible cost. The interactions are modeled as a Game of Chicken where, because actors calculate separately, each selects a higher price/lower quantity position than is optimal, resulting in a lower net payoff both individually and collectively.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bates R. H. Avner G. Levi M. & Rosenthal J.L. (1998). Analytic Narratives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Buchanan J. M. & Yoon Y. J. (2000). Symmetric Tragedies: Commons and Anticommons. The Journal of Law and Economics 43 1–14.

  • Fennell L. A. (2004). Common Interest Tragedies. Northwestern University Law Review 98 907–90.

  • Fiszbein A. [editor]. (2001). Decentralizing education in transition societies : case studies from Central and Eastern Europe (English). WBI learning resources series*World Bank Institute (WBI). Washington D.C. : The World Bank. Retrieved from:

  • Gheorghiţă E. (2012 January 22). Clasa pregătitoare obligatorie din septembrie. Ce vor învăţa copiii şi cum vor fi evaluaţi. Mediafax. Retrieved from:

  • Govinda R. (1997). Decentralization of educational management: experiences from South Asia. In R. Govinda (ed.) Decentralization of Educational Management: Experiences from South Asia. Research Report No. 107 Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.

  • Hardin G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162 1243–48.

  • Heller M. A. (1998). The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets. Harvard Law Review 111 621–88.

  • Heller M. A. (2008). Gridlock Economy. New York: Basic Books.

  • Institute of Education Sciences. (2013). Implementarea Clasei Pregătitoare în Sistemul Educațional Românesc în Anul Școlar 2012-2013. Retrieved from:

  • Major I. King R.F. & MARIAN C.G. (2016). Anticommons the Coase Theorem and the problem of bundling inefficiency. International Journal of the Commons 10(1) 244–264.

  • Mediafax. (2012a March 19). Inspectoratul Şcolar al Capitalei: Am suplimentat cu 10-12 clasele pentru înscrierea în învăţământul primar. Mediafax. Retrieved from:

  • Mediafax. (2012b May 29). La clasele pregătitoare nu vor preda cadre didactice debutante. Mediafax. Retrieved from:

  • Mediafax. (2012c August 29). ANALIZĂ: Clasa pregătitoare - un experiment pentru copii părinţi şi dascăli din 10 septembrie. Mediafax. Retrieved from:

  • Mediafax. (2012d August 31). DOSAR MEDIAFAX: Mii de copii încep şcoala în clădiri care stau să cadă. Pentru unii şcoala e un canton silvic. Situaţia pe judeţe a unităţilor de învăţământ. Mediafax. Retrieved from:

  • Mediafax. (2012e May 20). Liviu Pop: Voi retrage licitaţiile la clasa pregătitoare. Anul acesta facem improvizaţie. Mediafax. Retrieved from:

  • Mukudan M.V. & Bray M. (2004). The Decentralization of Education in Kerala State India: Rhetoric and Reality. International Review of Education – Internationale Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswissenschaft – Revue Internationale de l’Education 50 223–243.

  • Namusaka I. & Buye R. (2007). Decentralization and Education in Uganda. Canadian and International Education / Education canadienne et international 36 93–116.

  • OSCE Mission to Skopje. (2011). Decentralization Assessment Report 2006–2011. Retrieved from:

  • Parisi F. Depoorter B. & Schultz N. (2005). Duality in Property: Commons and Anticommons. International Review of Law and Economics 25(4) 578–591.

  • Pop F. (2012c January 25). Prezenţa obligatorie în clasa zero. Adevarul. Retrieved from:

  • Prawda J. (1993). Educational decentralization in Latin America: Lessons learned. International Journal of Educational Development 13(3) 253–264.

  • Suceava News. (2012 August 22). Primăria Suceava va asigura fonduri pentru funcţionarea claselor pregătitoare. Suceava News. Retrieved from:

  • Tribuna. (2012 January 23). În judeţul Sibiu 3.457 de copii intră în clasa pregătitoare. Tribuna. Retrieved from:

  • UNESCO. (2005). Decentralization in education: National policies and practices. ED 2005/WS/31. Retrieved from:

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.156
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.430

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 381 205 8
PDF Downloads 228 106 2