Policy Implementation: Lessons from the Chilean Policy on Public Management Modernization

Open access


This paper analyses the implementation of public management modernization policy between 1990 and 2013, applying the taxonomy by Hasenfeld and Brock (1991). Information analysed in this study comes from 67 interviews with actors who have played key roles in the implementation of modernization initiatives, as well as from official documents, and academic literature. The findings of the study suggest that taxonomy is useful in characterizing the organizational and inter-organizational behavioural patterns that influence policy implementation;also, that the prevalent driving forces help to understand the dynamic of implementation and what capacities, abilities and strategies are required to put into practice a concrete public policy, which appear to be linked to the context in which implementation takes place.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aninat C Landregan J Navia P. & Vial J. (2006). “Political Institutions Policymaking Process and Policy Outcomes in Chile.” Inter - AmericanDevelopment Bank Research Network Working Paper R - 521.Washington DC: IADB.

  • Ardanaz M. Scartascini C. & Tommasi M. (2010). Political institutions policymaking and economic policy in Latin America. Working PaperNºIDB-WP-158. Washington DC: IADB

  • Bardach E. (1977). The Implementation Game: what happens after a billbecomes a law. Cambridge MA USA: MIT Press.

  • Barzelay M Gaetani F Cortázar J.C. & Cejudo G. (2003). Researchon Public Management Policy Change in the Latin America Region: aconceptual framework and methodological guide. International PublicManagement Review 4 (1) 20-42.

  • Birkland T. A. (2009). Disasters Catastrophes and Policy Failures in theHomeland Security Era. Review of Policy Research 26 (4) 423-438.

  • Boeninger E. (2007). Políticas Públicas en Democracia: institucionalidad yexperiencia chilena 1990 - 2006. Santiago Chile: Uqbar Editores.

  • Bueno de Mesquita B.; Morrow J.D. Siverson R.M. & Smith A.(1999). Policy Failure and Political Survival: the contribution of politicalinstitution. Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (2) 147-161.

  • Chile Republic of. (2008). Law 20285 sobre Acceso a la InformaciónPública. Valparaíso Chile: Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional.

  • Cortázar J. C. (2011). Aprendiendo a partir de la Reforma del ServicioCivil en Chile. Algunas lecciones de interés para países latinoamericanos.Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia 49 1-14.

  • Cortázar J. C. (Ed). (2007). Entre el diseño y la evaluación: el papel crucialde la implementación de los programas sociales. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

  • Denis J-L Langley A. & Rouleau L. (2005). Rethinking Leadership inPublic Organizations. In E. Ferlie L. E. Lynn Jr. & C. Pollit (Eds) TheOxford Handbook of Public Management (pp. 446 - 467). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Dimitrakopoulos D. & Richardson J. (2001). Implementing EU PublicPolicy. In J. Richardson (Ed.) European Union: power and policy-making 2nd Edition (pp. 335-356). London & New York: Routledge.

  • Elmore R. F. (1979-1980). Backward Mapping: implementation researchand policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly 94 (4) 601-616.

  • Guzmán M. (2005). Sistema de Control de Gestión y Presupuestopor Resultados: la Experiencia Chilena. Santiago Chile: Ministerio deHacienda Dirección de Presupuesto.

  • Halligan J. 2012. Leadership and the Senior Service from a ComparativePerspective. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook ofPublic Administration Concise Second Edition (pp. 100 - 114). London Great Britain: SAGE.

  • Hasenfeld Y. & Brock T. (1991). Implementation of Social PolicyRevisited. Journal of Administration and Society 22 (4) 451-479.

  • Hondeghem A. & Vandermeulen F. (2000). Competency managementin the Flemish and Dutch civil service. The International Journal of PublicSector Management13 (4) 342 - 353.

  • Howlett M. & Ramesh M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: policycycles and policy subsystems Second Edition. Toronto Canada: OxfordUniversity Press.

  • Hughes O. E. (2012). Public Management & Administration 4th Edition.London Great Britain: Palgrave McMillan.

  • Iacoviello Mercedes y Luciano Strazza. 2014. “Diagnostic of the civilservice in Latin America”. En: Cortázar Velarde Juan Carlos; Lafuente Mariano y Mario Sanginés (editores). Serving citizens: a decade of civilservice reform in Latin America (2004-2013). Washington DC: BancoInteramericano de Desarrollo.

  • Kettl D. F. & Fesler J.W. (2005). The Politics of the Administrative Process 3rd Edition. Washington DC USA: CQ Press.

  • Lipsky M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual inpublic service. New York USA: SAGE.

  • Lowi T. (1995). American Business Public Policy Case Studies andPolitical Theory. In D. C. McCool Public Policy Theories Models andConcepts: an Anthology (pp. 177-181). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

  • Marsh D. & McConnell A. (2010). Towards a Framework for EstablishingPolicy Success. Public Administration 88 (2) 564-583.

  • McConnell A. (2010a). Understanding Policy Success: rethinking publicpolicy. UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

  • McConnell A. (2010b). Policy Success Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between. Journal of Public Policy 30 (3) 345 - 362.

  • McGrath R. (2009). Implementation Theory Revisited … Again: Lessonsfrom the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. Politics & Policy 37(2) 309 - 336.

  • Ministerio de Hacienda Chile (MINDHA). (2012). Estado de la HaciendaPública 2012. Santiago Chile: MINDHA.

  • Navia P. (2004) Modernización del Estado y financiamiento de lapolítica: Una crisis que se transformó en oportunidad. In C. Stefoni (Ed.) Chile 2003-2004: Los nuevos escenarios (inter)nacionales (pp. 177-194).Santiago Chile: FLACSO.

  • Olavarría M; Navarrete B & and Figueroa V. (2011). ¿Cómo se formulanlas políticas públicas en Chile? Evidencia desde un studio de caso. Políticay Gobierno XVIII (1) 109 - 154.

  • O’Toole Jr. Laurence J. and Robert S. Montjoy. 1984. “InterorganizationalPolicy Implementation: a theoretical perspective.” Public AdministrationReview Vol. 44 Nº6 pp. 491 - 503. USA: American Society for PublicAdministration.

  • Sabatier P. & Jenkins-Smith H.C. (1999). The Advocacy CoalitionFramework: An Assessment. In P. Sabatier Theories of the Policy Process(pp. 117 - 166). Boulder Colorado: Westview Press.

  • Sabatier P. & Mazmanian D. (1980). The Implementation of Public Policy: a framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal 8 (4) 538 - 560.

  • Saetren H. (2005). Facts and Myths about Research on Public Policy Implementation: out-of-fashion allegedly dead but still very much alive and relevant. The Policy Studies Journal 33 (4) 559-582.

  • Servicio Civil Chile. (2014). Qué es el Servicio Civil. www.serviciocivil.gob.cl. Web site visited on May 2014.

  • Scartascini C. Spiller P. Stein E. & Tommasi M. (Eds). (2011). El juego politico en América Latina: ¿Cómo se deciden las políticas públicas. Washington DC: BID.

  • Stein E. Tommasi M. Spiller P. & Scartascini C. (Eds). (2008). Policymaking in Latin America: how politics shape policy. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

  • Stein E. Tommasi M. Echebarría K. Lora E. & Payne M. (Coordinators). (2006). La política de las políticas públicas: progreso económico y social en América Latina. Informe 2006. Washington DC: BID Planeta.

  • Valles M. S. (2007). Técnicas Cualitativas de Investigación Social: Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional Cuarta Reimpresión. Madrid España: Editorial Síntesis.

  • Weatherley R. & Lipsky M. (1977). Street level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: implementing special educational reform in Massachusetts. Harvard Educational Review 47 (2) 171-197.

  • Yin R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. California USA: Sage.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.156
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.430

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 907 342 8
PDF Downloads 459 174 5