Counterfactual Impact Evaluation of the Project Internships for Young Job Seekers

Open access

Abstract

The growing youth unemployment across Europe raises the need to take appropriate measures. One of steps taken towards decreasing it by the European Union has been the program Youth Guarantee, implemented by a number of member states. Despite the relatively lower youth unemployment, the Czech Republic has implemented this program as well, and supported the realization of the project Internships for Young Job Seekers, whose aim was to ease the transition for students from schools to the labour market thanks to internships in companies. The effects which internship related project bring for their participants have been evaluated in other EU countries, mainly in Germany, but also in Sweden or France. However, evidence about internships’ effectiveness has been missing for the Czech Republic, and this paper fills this existing knowledge gap with the use of counterfactual impact evaluation methods. In the paper, we have focused on examining the impacts of internships on personal income and economic status of trainees by using the propensity score matching, difference-in-differences estimation and two complementary methods – ordinary least squares and multinomial logit. The results confirmed a positive impact of internships on treated project participants regarding both outcome variables, and thus, are consistent with the majority of literature in the field.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abadie A. (2002). Bootstrap Tests for Distributional Treatment Effects in Instrumental Variable Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 97(457) p. 284-292.

  • Aldrich J. H. and Nelson F. D. (1984). Linear Probability Logit and Probit Models. 1st edition. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

  • Becker S. O. and Ichino A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal. 1(4) p. 358–377.

  • Cameron A. C. and Trivedi P. K. (2013). Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chéron A. Rouland B. & Wolff F. C. (2010). Returns to firm-provided training in FR: Evidence on mobility and wages. HAL.

  • Fitzenberger B. and Völter R. (2007). Long-run effects of training programs for the unemployed in DE (E). Labour Economics14(4) 730-755.

  • Fitzenberger B. Osikominu A. and Völter R. (2006). Get training or wait?: long-run employment effects of training programs for the unemployed in DE (W) (No. 2006 17). IAB discussion paper.

  • Jespersen S. T. Munch J. R. and Skipper L. (2008). Costs and benefits of Danish active labour market programmes. Labour economics15(5) 859-884.

  • Kopf E. (2013). Short training for welfare recipients in DE: which types work?. International Journal of Manpower34(5) 486-516.

  • Lechner M. Miquel R. and Wunsch C. (2007). The curse and blessing of training the unemployed in a changing economy: The case of DE (E) after unification. German Economic Review8(4) 468-509.

  • Lechner M. Miquel R. and Wunsch C. (2011). Long-run effects of public sector sponsored training in DE (W). Journal of the European Economic Association9(4) 742-784.

  • Manning A. (2008). Differences-in-Differences and A Brief Introduction to Panel Data. Lectures on London School of Economics.

  • O’Higgins N. (2015). Youth Unemployment. IZA Policy Paper No. 103. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.

  • Pecáková I. (2007). Logistická regrese s vícekategoriální vysvětlovanou proměnnou. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia. 15(1) p. 86-96.

  • Rinne U. Schneider M. and Uhlendorff A. (2011). Do the skilled and prime-aged unemployed benefit more from training? Effect heterogeneity of public training programmes in DE. Applied Economics43(25) 3465-3494.

  • Sianesi B. (2002). Swedish active labour market programmes in the 1990s: overall effectiveness and differential performance (No. W02/03). Institute for Fiscal Studies.

  • Sianesi B. (2008). Differential effects of active labour market programs for the unemployed. Labour economics15(3) 370-399.

  • Wolff J. and Jozwiak E. (2007). Does short-term training activate means-tested unemployment benefit recipients in DE? (No. 2007 29). IAB discussion paper.

  • Wooldridge J. M. (2009). Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 4th edition. Mason OH: Cengage Learning.

  • Wooldridge J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. 2nd edition. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Wünsch C. and Lechner M. (2008). What did all the money do? On the general ineffectiveness of recent West German labour market programmes. Kyklos61(1)134-174.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.156
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.430

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 366 197 9
PDF Downloads 231 136 8