Shortfall of Strategic Governance and Strategic Management in the Czech Republic

Open access

Abstract

The article analyses the problems of strategic governance and strategic management of the Czechoslovak Government, as well as the Government of the Czech Republic in the years 1989-2016. It seeks the causes and factors that have caused the low levels of strategic governance and strategic management at the level of the ministries of the Czech Republic. It examines the problem from genetic and historical perspective, and from the organizational and human capacity to exercise strategic governance. The study is based on two pieces of empirical research within the ministries of the Czech Republic. It identifies the main cause of failure of strategic governance and strategic management at the level of the central government of the Czech Republic. These include, in particular, the persistent distrust of the ideas of strategic governance and strategic management held by the right-wing governments and the generally low capacity of governments of the Czech Republic to engage in strategic governance. The organizational structure of the central state administration lacks the strategic units that generate ideas for supporting strategic governance. The empirical research of the ministries of the Czech Republic also revealed that policy workers in Czech ministries dedicate a large proportion of their work time to operational and administrative activities at the expense of analytical and strategic activities. The changes require implementation of reforms within the public administration, which (among other things) will eliminate the existing causes and inhibiting factors regarding the lack of strategic governance in the Czech Republic.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Act no. 2/1969 Coll. on the establishment of ministries and other central government authorities of the Czech Republic as amended.

  • Aristovnik A. & Seljak J. (2009). Performance budgeting: selected international experiences and some lessons for Slovenia. MPRA Paper No. 15499 posted 4. June 2009 08:29 UTC. Retrieved from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15499/

  • Arnstein S. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners35 (4) 216-224.

  • Bouckaert G. Nemec J. Nakrošis V. Hajnal G. & Tõnnisson K. (2009). Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.

  • Colebatch H. K. Hoppe R. & Noordegraaf M. (Eds.) (2010). Working for Policy. Amsterdam: University Press.

  • Coombes D. &Verheijen T. (1997). Reforma verejnej správy: Porovnanie skúseností východu a západu [Public administration reform: comparison of West and East experience]. Bratislava: NISPAcee.

  • De Vries M. & Nemec J. (2013). Public Sector reform: an overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management 26(1) 4-16.

  • Dunn N.W. Staroňová K. & Pushkarev S. (2006). Implementation: The Missing Link in Public Administration Reform in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee.

  • Dror Y. (2004). Strategic Brain for Central Government. In Potůček M. (ed.). The Capacity to Govern in Central and Eastern Europe pp. 15–27. Bratislava: NISPAcee.

  • Evans B. M. & Wellstead A. (2013). Policy dialogue and engagement between non-governmental organizations and government: A survey of processes and instruments of Canadian policy workers. Central European Journal of Public Policy 7 (1) 60–87.

  • Evans B. Lum J. & Shields J. (2011). The State of Policy Capacity in Canada: Assessments from Senior Public Servants. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association May 16-18 2011. Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo Ontario. Retrieved from: // https://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2011/Evans1.pdf

  • Howlett M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration 52 (2) 153–173.

  • Howlett M. (2011). Public Managers as the Missing Variable in Policy Studies: An Empirical Investigation Using Canadian Data. Review of Policy Research. 28(3) 247–263.

  • Forbes D.P. & Milliken F.J. (1999). Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups. Academy of Management Review 24 (3) 489-505.

  • Frič P. & Nekola M. (2011). Výzva čtvrtá: Elity a veřejnost [Challenge Four: Elites and the Public]. In Potůček M. et al. Poznávání budoucnosti jako výzva [Cognition of the Future as a Challenge] pp. 55-80. Praha: Nakladatelství Karolinum.

  • Ghosh M. & John G. (2005). Strategic Fit in Industrial Alliances: An Empirical Test of Governance Value Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research. Vol. XLII (August 2005) 346–357. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.714.2176&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Governance for Human Development (2000). UNDP FRY: December.

  • Hajek F. A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. London: George Routledge and Sons Ltd.

  • Hajek F. A. (1979). The Counter-Revolution of Science. Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

  • Hajek F. A. (1973). Law Legislation and Liberty. London: Routleger Kegan Ltd.

  • Harris B. (2005). Strategic governance. Retrieved from http://www.nonprofitcenter.com

  • Immergut E. M. (1998). The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics and Society 26 (1) 5–34.

  • Loorbach D. (2010). Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive Complexity-Based Governance Framework. Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 23(1) 161–183.

  • Montenegro Meyer L. & Bulgakov S. (2014). Reflection on Actor-Network Theory Governance Networks and Strategic Outcomes. Brazilian Administration Review. V. 11 (1) art 6 107-124. Retrieved from http://www.anpad.org.br/bar.

  • Mulgan G. (2004). Strategy in Government. The United Kingdom Experience. In Potůček M.(ed.). The Capacity to Govern in Central and Eastern Europe pp. 33-62. Bratislava NISPAcee.

  • Nekola M. & Kohoutek J. (2016). Policy work at the sub-national level: Analytical styles of Canadian and Czech directors and managers. Canadian Public Administration/Administration Publique du Canada. 59(2) 289–309.

  • Novotný V. & Nekola M. 2010. Strategické řízení a teoretické přístupy k procesu tvorby veřejných politik (Strategic Management and Theoretical Approaches to Policy-making Process). In Ochrana F. (Ed.) Drhová Z. Frič P. Nekola M. Novotný V. Potůček M. Rašek A. Simonová J. & Veselý A. Strategické řízení ve veřejné správě a přístupy k tvorbě politiky pp. 61-87. 1. vyd. Praha: Matfyzpress.

  • Nemec J. (2010). New Public Management and its Implementation in CEE: What Do we Know and where Do we Go? NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy. 3 (1) 31-52.

  • Niskanen W.A. (1998). Policy Analysis and Public Choice. Selected Papers by William A. Niskanen. Cheltenham UK – Northampton MA USA.

  • Ochrana F. &al. (2010). Strategické řízení ve veřejné správě a přístupy ke tvorbě politiky. [Strategic management in public administration and approaches towards policy-making]. Praha: Matfyzpress.

  • Osborne D. & Gaebler T. (1993). Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Plaček M. Půček M. Ochrana F. Křápek M. & Matějová L. (2016). Political Business Cycle in the Czech Republic: Case of Municipalities. Prague Economic Papers 25(3) 304-320. doi:10.18267/j.pep.566.

  • Pollit Ch. & Bouckaert G. (2004). Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. Second edition. Oxford: University Press.

  • Potůček M. (Ed.) (2004). The Capacity to Govern in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava NISPAcee 2004.

  • Potůček M. & al. (2007). Strategické vládnutí a Česká republika. [Strategic Governance and the Czech Republic]. Praha: Grada.

  • Potůček M. & al. (2011). Poznávání budoucnosti jako výzva [Discovering Future as a Challenge]. Praha: Karolinum.

  • Potůček M. et al. (2016). Veřejná politika (Public policy). Praha: C.H. Beck

  • Potůček M. & Přikryl J. (2007). Strategické vládnutí a Česká republika po roce 1989. [Strategic Governance and the Czech Republic after 1989]. In. Potůček M. et al. Strategické vládnutí a Česká republika. (Strategic Governance and the Czech Republic) pp. 125-136. Praha: Grada.

  • Rosenbaum A. Nemec J. & al. (2006). Democratic Governance in CEE Countries: Challenges and Responses for XXI Century. Bratislava: NISPAcee.

  • Sabatier P.A. & Jenkins-Smith H.C. (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment pp. 117-166. In Sabatier P.A. (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. First edition. Boulder (Col.): Westview Press.

  • Sabatier P.A. & Weible Ch.M. (2007). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovation and Clarifications. In Sabatier P.A. (ed.). Theories of the Policy Process. Second edition pp. 189–220. Boulder (Col.): Westview Press.

  • Van Doeveren N. (2011). Rethinking Good Governance. Public Integrity 13(4) 301–318. Advance online publication. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922130401

  • Veselý A. (2013). Conducting large-N Surveys on Policy Work in Bureaucracies: Some Methodological Challenges and Implications from the Czech Republic. Central European Journal of Public Policy 7(2) 88-113.

  • Veselý A. (2014). The Profile and Work of Officials in Central and Regional Administration Compared: The Case of the Czech Republic. NISPAcee Journal 7(1) 107-128.

  • Veselý A. Wellstead A. & Evans B. (2014). Comparing sub-national policy workers in Canada and the Czech Republic: Who are they what they do and why it matters? Policy and Society 33(2) 103-115.

  • Vymětal P. (2008). What is good governance about? The roots and the key elements of the concept. Working papers 2(11) 5-17. Prague: Oeconomica. Faculty of International Relations. Wright G. & Nemec J. (Eds.) (2002). Public Management in the Central and Eastern European Transition: Concepts and Cases. Bratislava: NISPA.

  • Commission of the European Communities (2001). Brussels 25.7. 2001. Retrieved from: http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ardb/evt/1_avrupa_birligi/1_6_raporlar/1_1_white_papers/com2001_white_paper_european_governance.pdf.

  • MMR ČR (2013) Metodika přípravy veřejných strategií [Methodology of preparation of public policies]. Praha: Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj. Retrieved from: http://www.mmr.cz/getmedia/4ebb3cc7-6f5c-4f37-ad1f-97054a212483/metodika-pripravy-verejnych-strategii_listopad-2012.pdf.

  • MV ČR (2007). Efektivní veřejná správa a přátelské veřejné služby Strategie realizace Smart Administration v období 2007–2015. [Effective Public Administration and Friendly Public Services Strategy of Implementation of Smart Administration in 2007–2015]. Praha: Ministertvo vnitra. Retrieved from: http://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/verejna-sprava-dokumenty-modernizace-dokumenty.aspx.

  • Místní Agenda 21 [Local Agenda 21]. Retrieved from: http://www1.cenia.cz/www/ma21

  • UNESCAP (2008). What is good governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from: http://www.unescap.org/resources/what-good-governance.

  • Schuster J.H. Smith D.G. Corak K.A. &Yamada M.M. (1994). Strategic governance: How to Make Big Decisions Better. American Council on Education. Series on Higher Education: ORYX Press.

  • Johnson G. Langley A. Mein L.& Whittington R. (2007). Strategy as practice: research directions and resources. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wisser M. (2016). Management control accountability and learning in public sector organizations: A critical analysis. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297369634_Management_Control_Accountability_and_Learning_in_Public_Sector_Organizations_A_Critical_Analysis.

  • The Civil Service Act no. 234/2014. Retrieved from: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2014-234.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.156
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.430

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 361 229 16
PDF Downloads 198 136 10