Aluminium is one of the environmental factors that may have an impact on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Some epidemiological studies show a relationship between the concentration of aluminium in drinking water and the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. The article presents and discusses the results of research on the effect of the type and dose of non-prehydrolyzed aluminium coagulants on the concentration of residual aluminium in water intended for human consumption. Aluminium sulphate (VI) and sodium aluminate were tested as coagulants. Analysis of the obtained test results showed that lower concentrations of residual aluminium were found after coagulation with aluminium sulphate (VI), which is hydrolyzed acidally, lowering the pH of the water in the range of 7.47 to 7.12 providing good conditions for the formation of Al(OH)3. A less useful coagulant due to the concentration of residual aluminium was sodium aluminate, which undergoes basic hydrolysis creating conditions for the transition of Al(OH)3 into soluble Al(OH)4−.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Bachir, M, Brakchi, S and Azzouz, A 2016. Risk of residual aluminum in treated waters with aluminum sulphate. Advances in Research6, 1-8.
2. Campbell, A 2002. The potential role of aluminium in Alzheimer’s disease. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation17, 17-20.
3. Dempsey, BA, Ganho, RM and O’Melia, CR 1984. The coagulation of humic substances by means of aluminum salts. Journal Americ Water Works Association76, 141-151.
4. Gumińska, J 2011. Effect of Changes in Al Speciation on the Efficiency of Water Treatment with Pre-hydrolyzed Coagulants. Ochrona Środowiska33, 17-21.
5. Jakubaszek, A and Mossetty, J 2019. Changes to water quality in the water supply network of Zielona Góra. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports29, 92–101.
6. Kimura, M, Motsui, Y, Kendo, K and Ishikawa, TB 2013. Minimizing residual aluminum concentration in treated water by tailoring properties of polyaluminum coagulants. Water Research 47, 2075-2084.
7. Krupińska, I 2012. Suitability of coagulation for treatment of groundwater. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska14, 491-501.
8. Krupińska, I 2015. Effect of temperature and pH on the effectiveness of pollutant removal from groundwater in the process of coagulation. Ochrona Środowiska37, 35-42.
9. Krupińska, I 2016. The impact of the oxidising agent type and coagulant type on the effectiveness of coagulation in the removal of pollutants from underground water with an increased content of organic substances. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management24, 70-78.
10. Krupińska, I 2016. The Influence of Aeration and Type of Coagulant on Effectiveness in Removing Pollutants from Groundwater in the Process of Coagulation. Chemical And Biochemical Engineering Quarterly30, 465-475.
11. Krupińska, I 2018. Removal of natural organic matter from groundwater by coagulation using prehydrolysed and non - prehydrolysed coagulants. Desalination and Water Treatment132, 244-252.
12. Matsui, Y and Yuasa, A, 1998. Dynamic analysis of coagulation with alum and PACl. Journal Americ Water Works Association90, 96-108.
13. McLachlan, DR, Kruck, TP, Lukiw, WJ and Krishnan, SS 1991. Would decreased aluminium ingestion reduce the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Can Med Assoc J145, 793-804.
14. Nilsson, R 1990. Residual aluminium concentration in drinking water after treatment with aluminium or iron salts. Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment Springer Verlag, 399-410.
15. Nowacka, A, Włodarczyk Makuła, M and Macherzyński, B 2014. Comparison of effectiveness of coagulation with aluminum sulfate and pre- hydrolyzed aluminum coagulants. Desalination and Water Treatment52, 3843-3851.
16. Packham, RF 2007. The coagulation process. II. Effect of pH on the precipitation of aluminium hydroxide. Journal of Applied Chemistry12, 564-568.
17. Płuciennik-Koropczuk, E and Kumanowska, P 2018. Chemical stability of water in the water supply network - preliminary research. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports28, 79–89.
18. Regulation of the Minister of Health dated December 7, 2017 amending the regulation on the quality of drinking water mean for human consumption.
19. Rondeau, V, Commenges, D, Jacqmin-Gadda, H and Dartiques JF 2000. Relation between aluminium concentration in drinking water and Alzheimer’s disease: An 8 year foliow-up study. Am J Epidemiol 152, 59-66.
20. Sieliechi, JM, Kayem, GJ and Sandu, I 2010. Effect of water treatment residuals (aluminium and iron ions) on human health and drinking water distribution systems. International Journal of Conservation Science1,175-182.
21. Sigel, S 1998. Aluminium and its Role in Biology. New York 1988.
22. Yan, M, Wang, D, Yu, J, Ni, J, Edwards, M and Qu, J 2008. Enhanced coagulation with polyaluminum chlorides: Role of pH/Alkalinity and speciation. Chemosphere71, 1665-1673.
23. Yang, Z, Gao, B, Wang, Y, Wang, Q, Yue, Q 2011. Aluminum fractions in surface water from reservoirs by coagulation treatment with polyaluminum chloride (PAC): Influence of initial pH and OH-/Al3+ ratio. Chemical Engineering Journal170, 107-113.
24. Yang, Z, L, Gao, B,Y, Yue, Q,Y, Wang, Y 2010. Effect of pH on the coagulation performance of Al-based coagulants and residual aluminum speciation during the treatment of humic acid-kaolin synthetic water. Journal of Hazardous Materials178, 596-603.
25. Yue, Z, Baoyou, S, Yuanyuan, Z, Mingquan, Y, Darren, A, L, Dongsheng, W 2016. Deposition behavior of residual aluminum in drinking water distribution system: Effect of aluminum speciation. Journal of Environmental Sciences 42, 142-151.
26. Zuziak, J and Jakubowska, M 2016. Glin w otoczeniu i jego wpływ na organizmy żywe. Analit 2, 110-120.