In this paper, the vibration analysis in terms of modal and harmonic responses are investigated for the power station structure of Kenyir Dam in Terengganu, Malaysia. Modal analysis is carried out to provide the dynamic characteristics of the power station which includes the natural frequencies and mode shapes. Meanwhile, the harmonic response analysis is performed by applying the force to the structure to obtain the Frequency Response Function (FRF) in certain range of frequencies. A real scale three-dimensional (3D) model of the Kenyir Dam power station is constructed using SolidWorks software and imported to ANSYS software for the Finite Element (FE) analysis. A proper boundary condition is taken into consideration to demonstrate the real behaviour of the power station structure. From the results, six most significant natural frequencies and mode shapes including the FRF in all three axes are selected. The highest natural frequency value occurred at 5.4 Hz with the maximum deflection of 0.90361 m in the z axis direction. This value is important in order to verify whether the structure can overcome the resonance phenomenon from the external disturbance forces in the future.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Kanazawa, K, Sawada, Y, Nagumo, H and Itoh, Y 2004. Earthquake Response Characteristics of Rock-Fill Dam With Asymmetrical Section in Dam Axis Direction. 13th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., No. 816.
2. Singh, VK, Chauhan, NS and Kushwaha, D 2015. An Overview of Hydro-Electric Power Plant. ISST J. Mech. Eng., vol. 6, No. 1, 59–62.
3. Ajibola, OOE, Ajala, OS, Akaanmu, JO and Balogun, OJ 2018. Improvement of Hydroelectric Power Generation Using Pumped Storage System. Niger. J. Technol., vol. 37, No. 1, 191–199.
4. Kulkarni, SR, Ukarande, SK and Jagtap, SA 2016. Dam Break Analysis - A Review. ISSN 2347 - 2812, vol. 4, No. 4, 31–35.
5. Thieffry, BP and Manager, LP 2010. Best of Both Worlds : Combining APDL with ANSYS Workbench for Structural Simulations. 48–50.
6. Bhashyam, GR 2002. ANSYS Mechanical - A Powerful Nonlinear Simulation Tool.
7. Elmenshawy, MRE 2015. Static And Dynamic Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams. Tanta University.
8. Chopra, AK and Chakrabarti, P 1972 The Earthquake Experience at Koyna Dam and Stresses in Concrete Gravity Dams. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
9. Khosravi, S and Heydari, MM 2015. Design and Modal Analysis of Gravity Dams by Ansys Parametric Design Language. Walailak J. Sci. Technol., vol. 12, No. 2, 167–180.
10. Han, L and Hu, X 2017. SPH Modeling of Fluid-Structure Interaction. 12th International SPHERIC Workshop.
11. Silveira, IV and Pedroso, LJ 2018. Analysis of Natural Frequencies and Modes of Vibration Involving Interaction Dam-Reservoir Foundation for Concrete Gravity Dams. Third Int. Dam World Conf.
12. Erhunmwun, I and Ikponmwosa, U 2017. Review on Finite Element Method. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag., vol. 21, No. 5, 999–1002.
13. Chaphalkar, SP, Khetre, SN and Meshram, AM 2015. Modal Analysis of Cantilever Beam Structure Using Finite Element Analysis and Experimental Analysis. Am. J. Eng. Res., vol. 4, No. 10, 178–185.
14. Khan, IA and Awari, GK 2014. Analysis of Natural Frequency and Mode Shape of All Edge Fixed Condition Plate with Uncertain Parameters. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 3, No. 2, 9277–9284.
15. Sulaiman, MSA, Yunus, MA, Bahari, AR and Rani, MNA 2017. Identification of Damage Based on Frequency Response Function (FRF) Data. MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 01025.
16. Dziedziech 2015. Time-Variant Frequency Response Function for Analysis of Time-Varying Mechanical Systems. vol. 34, No. 2, 29–33.