Performance Evaluation of Metakaolin as Low Cost Adsorbent for Manganese Removal in Anoxic Groundwater

Open access

Abstract

The recent climate condition and pollution problem related to surface water have led to water scarcity in Malaysia. Huge amount of groundwater has been identified as viable source for drinking water. This paper was aimed to investigate groundwater’s quality at specific location and metakaolin’s potential in the groundwater treatment in the removal of manganese. Groundwater purging was determined to be sufficient at 120 minutes where all three parameters (pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity) were stabilized. The groundwater studied is classified as both anoxic and reductive due the low dissolved oxygen value. It also can be categorized as brackish due to high value of conductivity and total dissolved solid. Manganese content in groundwater was determined as higher than of that permissible limit for raw water and drinking water which makes it unsuitable for them not suitable for consumption and cleaning purpose. Average manganese concentration in samples was 444.0 ppb where the concentrations of manganese ranged from 229.4 ppb to 760.3 ppb. Manganese developed is not that a strong positive correlation against iron concentration, total dissolved solids and conductivity; whereas has a moderate negative correlation against dissolved oxygen. The capability adsorption of manganese by metakaolin was assessed via batch method which indicated optimum dosage and contact time was 14g that removed average 30.2% and contact time optimum at 120 minutes which removed 33.2% manganese from the sample.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Abdullah NA Jusoh J and Kassim AR 2015. National Reports – Malaysia. In: Tsegai. D Liebe J and Ardakanian R. (ed). Capacity Development to Support National Drought Management Policies for Asia Pacific Countries. UN Water 98-104.

  • 2. Abdullah S Chand F Zakaria S and Loganatham P 2016. Transforming the Water Sector: National Integrated Water Resources Management Plan (Strategies and Roadmap) Volume 1. Academy of Science Malaysia.

  • 3. Tiwari K Goyal R and Sarkar A 2017. GIS-Based Spatial distribution of Groundwater Quality and Regional Suitability Evaluation for Drinking Water. Environmental Processes4(3) 645-662.

  • 4. Flindt JL Villholth KG and Refsgaard JC 2016. Groundwater management and protection in Denmark: a review of pre-conditions advances and challenges. International Journal of Water Resources Development 33(6) 868-889.

  • 5. Kim Y Han M Kabubi J Sohn HG and Nguyen DC 2016. Community-based rainwater harvesting (CB-RWH) to supply drinking water in developing countries: Lessons learned from case studies in Africa and Asia. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply16(4) 1110-1121.

  • 6. Belmeziti A Coutard O and De Gouvello B 2014. How much drinking water can be saved by using rainwater harvesting on a large urban area? Application to Paris agglomeration. Water Science and Technology70(11) 1782–1788.

  • 7. Siwar C and Ahmed F 2014. Concepts dimensions and elements of water security. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition13(5) 281–286.

  • 8. Chan NW Abdullah AL Ibrahim AL and Ghazali S 2003. River pollution and restoration towards sustainable water resources management in Malaysia. Society Space and Environment in a Globalized World: Prospects and Challenges 208–219.

  • 9. Issa AKM Arof ZM Yahaya AN Yusof KW Ibrahim NM and Salleh MS 2012. Using the Arau Model to Locate Groundwater Potential Zones in the Northern Regions of Malaysia. Jurnal Intelek UiTM Perlis7(1) 15–21.

  • 10. Suratman S. 2004. 6.6. IWRM: Managing the Groundwater Component in Malaysia. Malaysia Water Forum Kuala Lumpur Malaysia 19–22.

  • 11. Abdullah S Chand F Zakaria S Loganathan P 2016. Transforming the water sector: National Integrated Water Resources Management Plan (Strategies and Roadmap). Malaysia: Academy of Science Malaysia.

  • 12. Kura NU Ramli MF Sulaiman WN A Ibrahim S and Aris AZ 2018. An overview of groundwater chemistry studies in Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research28(8) 7231–7249.

  • 13. Abidin RZ Sulaiman MS and Yusoff N 2017. Erosion risk assessment: A case study of the Langat River bank in Malaysia. International Soil and Water Conservation Research5(1) 26–35.

  • 14. Qi S Hou D and Luo J 2017. Optimization of groundwater sampling approach under various hydrogeological conditions using a numerical simulation model. Journal of Hydrology552 505–515.

  • 15. Barcelona MJ Varljen MD Puls RW and Kaminski D 2005. Ground water purging and sampling methods: History vs. hysteria. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation25(1) 52–62.

  • 16. Sundaram B Feitz J Caritat DP Plazinska A Brodie SR Coram J and Ransley T 2010. Groundwater Sampling and Analysis-A Field Guide. Goescience Australia.

  • 17. Lin CY Abdullah MH Praveena SM Yahaya AHB and Musta B 2012. Delineation of temporal variability and governing factors influencing the spatial variability of shallow groundwater chemistry in a tropical sedimentary island. Journal of Hydrology432433 26–42.

  • 18. Metcalf MJ and Robbins GA 2013. Natural buffering of groundwater contaminants related to development in fractured rock. Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation33(4) 89–99.

  • 19. Grimmeisen F Zemann M Goeppert N and Goldscheider N 2016. Weekly variations of discharge and groundwater quality caused by intermittent water supply in an urbanized karst catchment. Journal of Hydrology537 157–170.

  • 20. Shakoor MB Niazi NK Bibi I Rahman MM Naidu R and Shahid M 2016. Speciation and health risk assessment of arsenic in groundwater of Punjab Pakistan. Arsenic Research and Global Sustainability (3) 463–464.

  • 21. Harter T Watanabe N Li X Atwill ER and Samuels W 2014. Microbial groundwater sampling protocol for fecal-rich environments. Groundwater52 126–136.

  • 22. Lin CY Abdullah MH Musta B Aris AZ and Praveena SM 2010. Assessment of selected chemical and microbial parameters in groundwater of Pulau Tiga Sabah Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana39(3) 337–345.

  • 23. Zhang Q Zhang S Lyu C Yang X Liu W and Su X 2018. A cost-effective catalytically adsorbent for in situ remediation of manganese contaminated groundwater. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply18(2) 504–514.

  • 24. Daniel R and Kawasaki N 2016. The Distribution of heavy metals and nutrients along Selangor River and its adjacent mining ponds Malaysia. International Journal of Advances in Agricultural and Environmental Engineering3(2) 241–244.

  • 25. Gillispie et al 2016. Soil weathering as an engine for manganese contamination of well water. Environmental Science and Technology50(18) 9963–9971.

  • 26. O’Neal SL and Zheng W 2015. Manganese toxicity upon overexposure: A decade in review. Current Environmental Health Reports2(3) 315–328.

  • 27. WHO. 2017. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: Fourth Edition Incorporating the First Addendum. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

  • 28. Oulhote et al 2014. Neurobehavioral function in school-age children exposed to manganese in drinking water. Environmental Health Perspectives122(12) 1343–1350.

  • 29. Spangler AH and Spangler JG 2009. Groundwater manganese and infant mortality rate by county in North Carolina: An ecological analysis. Ecohealth6(4) 596–600.

  • 30. Tobiason JE Bazilio A Goodwill J Mai X and Nguyen C 2016. Manganese removal from drinking water sources. Current Pollution Reports2(3) 168–177.

  • 31. Hassouna ME Shaban M and Nassif FM 2014. Removal of iron and manganese ions from groundwater using kaolin sub micro powder and its modified forms. International Jornal of Bioassays3(07) 3137–3145.

  • 32. Biela R and Kučera T 2016. Efficacy of sorption materials for nickel iron and manganese removal from water. Procedia Engineering162 56–63.

  • 33. Akbar NA Abdul Aziz H and Adlan MN 2016. Potential of high quality limestine as adsorbent for iron and manganese removal in groundwater. Jurnal Teknologi2(78) 77–82.

  • 34. He X Yang H and He Y 2010. Treatment of mine water high in Fe and Mn by modified manganese sand. Mining Science and Technology20(4) 571–575.

  • 35. Yavuz O Altunkaynak Y and Uzel FG 2003. Removal of copper nickel cobalt and manganese from aqueous solution by kaolinite. Water Research37 948–952.

  • 36. Ali RM Hamad HA Hussein MM and Malash GF 2016. Potential of using green adsorbent of heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions: Adsorption kinetics isotherm thermodynamic mechanism and economic analysis. Ecological Engineering91 317–332.

  • 37. Taffarel SR and Rubio J 2009. On the removal of Mn2+ ions by adsorption onto natural and activated Chilean zeolites. Minerals Engineering22(4) 336–343.

  • 38. Uddin MK 2017. A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals with special focus on the past decade. Chemical Engineering Journal308 438–462.

  • 39. Lawson et al 2013. Pond-derived organic carbon driving changes in arsenic hazard found in asian groundwaters. Environmental Science and Technology47(13) 7085–7094.

  • 40. Vail J 2013. Operating Procedure Groundwater sampling. Science and Ecosystem Support Division. Georgia : U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • 41. Driezum et al 2017. Does Pumping Volume Affect the Concentration of Micropollutants in Groundwater Samples? Groundwater Monitoring and Remediation 1–7.

  • 42. Akbar NA Aziz HA and Adlan MN 2015. Iron and manganese removal from groundwater using high quality limestone. Applied Mechanics and Materials802 460–465.

  • 43. McDonald JP and Smith RM 2009. Concentration profiles in screened wells under static and pumped conditions. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation29(2) 78–86.

  • 44. Salem MG El-Awady MH and Amin E 2012. Enhanced removal of dissolved iron and manganese from nonconventional water resources in delta district Egypt. Energy Procedia18 983–993.

  • 45. Essandoh HMK Tizaoui C Mohamed MHA Amy G and Brdjanovic D 2011. Soil aquifer treatment of artificial wastewater under saturated conditions. Water Research45(14) 4211–4226.

  • 46. Cipollina A Micale G and Rizzuti L 2009. Seawater desalination: conventional and renewable energy processes. Palermo: Springer Science & Business Media.

  • 47. Kato M Onuma S Kato Y Thang ND Yajima I Hoque MZ and Shekhar HU 2010. Toxic elements in well water from Malaysia. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry92(9) 1609–1612.

  • 48. Isa NM Aris AZ Lim WY Sulaiman WNAW and Praveena SM 2014. Evaluation of heavy metal contamination in groundwater samples from Kapas Island Terengganu Malaysia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences7(3) 1087–1100.

  • 49. Gerke TL Little BJ and Maynard JB 2016. Manganese deposition in drinking water distribution systems. Science of the Total Environment541 184–193.

  • 50. Kikuchi T Fujii M Terao K Jiwei R Lee YP and Yoshimura C 2017. Correlations between aromaticity of dissolved organic matter and trace metal concentrations in natural and effluent waters: A case study in the Sagami River Basin Japan. Science of the Total Environment576 36–45.

  • 51. Lee YP Fujii M Terao K Kikuchi T and Yoshimura C 2016. Effect of dissolved organic matter on Fe(II) oxidation in natural and engineered waters. Water Research103 160–169.

  • 52. Molofsky et al 2018. Purging and other sampling variables affecting dissolved methane concentration in water supply wells. Science of the Total Environment618 998–1007.

  • 53. Rakotondrabe et al 2018. Water quality assessment in the Bétaré-Oya gold mining area (East-Cameroon): Multivariate Statistical Analysis approach. Science of the Total Environment610611 831–844.

  • 54. Essomba JS Nsami JN Belibi PDB Tagne G.M and Mbadcam JK 2014. Adsorption of Cadmium (II) Ions from aqueous solution onto kaolinite and metakaolinite. Pure and Applied Chemical Sciences2(1) 11–30.

  • 55. Jiang MQ Jin XY Lu XQ and Chen ZL 2010. Adsorption of Pb(II) Cd(II) Ni(II) and Cu(II) onto natural kaolinite clay. Desalination252(13) 33–39.

  • 56. Ateia M Apul OG Shimizu Y Muflihah A Yoshimura C and Karanfil T 2017. Elucidating adsorptive fractions of natural organic matter on carbon nanotubes. Environmental Science & Technology (51) 7101–7110.

  • 57. Sdiri A and Higashi T 2013. Simultaneous removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by natural limestones. Applied Water Science3 29–39.

  • 58. Motsi T Rowson NA and Simmons MJH 2009. Adsorption of heavy metals from acid mine drainage by natural zeolite. International Journal of Mineral Processing92(2009) 42–48.

  • 59. Bogusz A Oleszczuk P and Dobrowolski R (2015). Application of laboratory prepared and commercially available biochars to adsorption of cadmium copper and zinc ions from water. Bioresource Technology196 540–549.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 18 18 7
PDF Downloads 14 14 6