Preliminary Studies About Knowledge and Applications of Science Mnemonics by Polish Pupils

Kamil Jurowski 1 , Anna Jurowska 2 ,  and Małgorzata Krzeczkowska 3 , 4
  • 1 The Toxicological and Pharmaceutical Analysis Group, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, ul. R. Ingardena 3, 30-060 Kraków, Poland
  • 2 The Coordination Chemistry Group, Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, ul. R. Ingardena 3, 30-060 Kraków, Poland
  • 3 Department of Chemical Education, Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, ul. R. Ingardena 3, 30-060 Kraków, Poland, fax +48 12 63 40 515
  • 4 Secondary School No. 6, ul. Wąska 7, 31-057 Kraków, Poland


Mnemonic devices are specific ways, which during coding new information apply known elements for improving subsequent access to that information in the memory. Consequently, not much is known about techniques for optimizing recall performance with mnemonic devices or the suitability of using mnemonic devices in educational applications. Moreover, in literature there are a lot of examples in chemistry, biology, physics and mathematics mnemonics approaches, however in the related literature, there is a lack of current and reliable studies for this subject. In this original work we describe mnemonic methods from this point of view in the learning and teachings of science subjects. A large trumps of this article is the demonstration of the old well-known method of the learning/teaching in the new scene. This is the first article in literature that present actual data about this topic according to learning and studying the science subjects by mnemonic studies.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Guthrie J, Encyclopedia of Education. New York: Macmillan Reference; 2002; 1669-1672.

  • [2] Mastropieri M, Scruggs T. Enhancing school success with mnemonic strategies. Intervention School Clinic. 1998;33:201-209. DOI: 10.1177/105345129803300402.

  • [3] Bellezza F. Mnemonic devices classification, characteristics, and criteria. Rev Educational Res. 1981;51:247-275. DOI: 10.3102/00346543051002247.

  • [4] Ericsson KA, Kintsch W. Long-term working memory. Psychol Rev. 1995;102:211-245. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211.

  • [5] Ericsson K. Exceptional memorizers: made, not born. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2003;7(6):233-235. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00103-7.

  • [6] Robertson-Tchabo E, Hausman C. A classical mnemonic for older learners: a trip that works! Educational Gerontol. 1976;1:215-226. DOI: 10.1080/0360127760010301.

  • [7] Kessels R, De Haan E. Mnemonic strategies in older people: a comparison of errorless and errorful learning. Age Ageing. 2003;32:529-533. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afg068.

  • [8] Gruneberg M, Monks J, Sykes R. The first letter mnemonic aid. Medical Sci: and Psychiatry: Social Occupational Medicine. 1977;5:304-308.

  • [9] Scruggs T, Mastropieri M, McLoone B, Levin J, Morrison C. Mnemonic facilitation of learning disabled students' memory for expository prose. J Educational Psychol. 1987;79:27-34. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.79.1.27.

  • [10] Mastropieri MA, Scruggs T, Fulk B. Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. J Learning Disabilities. 1990;23:92-96. DOI: 10.1177/002221949002300203.

  • [11] Scruggs T, Mastropieri M. Classroom applications ot mnemonic instruction: Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. Exceptional Children. 1992;58:219-229. DOI: 10.1177/001440299105800305.

  • [12] Kilpatrick J. Doing mathematics without understanding it: A commentary on Higbee and Kunihira. Educational Psychol Rev. 1985;20:65-68. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep2002_2.


Journal + Issues