We present a continuum hyperelastic model which describes the mechanical response of a skeletal muscle tissue when its strength and mass are reduced by aging. Such a reduction is typical of a geriatric syndrome called sarcopenia. The passive behavior of the material is described by a hyperelastic, polyconvex, transversely isotropic strain energy function, and the activation of the muscle is modeled by the so called active strain approach. The loss of ability of activating of an elder muscle is then obtained by lowering of some percentage the active part of the stress, while the loss of mass is modeled through a multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient. The obtained stress-strain relations are graphically represented and discussed in order to study some of the effects of sarcopenia.
1. A. Musesti, G. G. Giusteri, and A. Marzocchi, Predicting Ageing: On the Mathematical Modelization of Ageing Muscle Tissue, in Active Age- ing and Healthy Living (G. R. et al., ed.), IOS press, 2014. Chapter 17.
2. G. Giantesio and A. Musesti, A continuum model of skeletal muscle tissue with loss of activation, in Multiscale Models in Mechano and Tu- mor Biology: Modeling, Homogenization, and Applications (A. Gerisch, R. Penta, and J. Lang, eds.), vol. 122 of Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Springer, in press.
3. L. A. Taber and R. Perucchio, Modeling heart development, Journal of Elasticity, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 165-197, 2000.
4. G. Giantesio and A. Musesti, Strain-dependent internal parameters in hyperelastic biological materials, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, vol. 95, pp. 162-167, 2017.
5. D. Hawkins and M. Bey, A Comprehensive Approach for Studying Muscle-Tendon Mechanics, ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineer- ing, vol. 116, pp. 51-55, 1994.
6. R. L. Lieber and S. R. Ward, Skeletal muscle design to meet functional demands, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, vol. 366, no. 1570, pp. 1466-1476, 2011.
7. J. Schröder and P. Nefi, Invariant formulation of hyperelastic transverse isotropy based on polyconvex free energy functions, International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 40, pp. 401-445, 2003.
8. A. E. Ehret and M. Itskov, Modeling of anisotropic softening phenomena: Application to soft biological tissues, International Journal of Plas- ticity, vol. 25, pp. 901-919, 2009.
9. A. E. Ehret, M. Böl, and M. Itskov, A continuum constitutive model for the active behaviour of skeletal muscle, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 625-636, 2011.
10. A. E. Ehret and M. Itskov, A polyconvex hyperelastic model for fiberreinforced materials in application to soft tissues, Journal of Materials Science, vol. 42, pp. 8853-8863, 2007.
11. P. Nardinocchi and L. Teresi, On the Active Response of Soft Living Tissues, Journal of Elasticity, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 27-39, 2007.
12. D. Ambrosi and S. Pezzuto, Active Stress vs. Active Strain in Mechanobiology: Constitutive Issues, Journal of Elasticity, vol. 107, pp. 199-212, 2012.
13. A. Gizzi, C. Cherubini, S. Filippi, and A. Pandolfi, Theoretical and numerical modeling of nonlinear electromechanics with applications to biological active media, Communications in Computational Physics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 93-126, 2015.
14. A. Gizzi, A. Pandolfi, and M. Vasta, Viscoelectromechanics modeling of intestine wall hyperelasticity, International Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 143- 155, 2016.
15. C. A. Oatis, Kinesiology. The Mechanics and Pathomechanics of Human Movement. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2nd ed., 2009.
16. J. L. van Leeuwen, Optimum power output and structural design of sarcomeres, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 149, pp. 229-256, 1991.
17. M. Böl and S. Reese, Micromechanical modelling of skeletal muscles based on the finite element method, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 489-504, 2008.
18. T. Heidlauf and O. Röhrle, A multiscale chemo-electro-mechanical skeletal muscle model to analyze muscle contraction and force generation for difierent muscle fiber arrangements, Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 5, p. 498, 2014.
19. A. J. Cruz-Jentoft, J. P. Baeyens, J. M. Bauer, Y. Boirie, T. Cederholm, F. Landi, F. C. Martin, J. P. Michel, Y. Rolland, S. M. Schneider, E. Topinkovfia, M. Vandewoude, and M. Zamboni, Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis, Age and Ageing, vol. 39, pp. 412- 423, 2010.
20. T. Lang, T. Streeper, P. Cawthon, K. Baldwin, D. R. Taafie, and T. B. Harris, Sarcopenia: etiology, clinical consequences, intervention, and assessment, Osteoporosis International, vol. 21, pp. 543-559, 2010.
21. S. von Haehling, J. E. Morley, and S. D. Anker, An overview of sarcopenia: facts and numbers on prevalence and clinical impact, Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 1, pp. 129-133, 2010.
22. A. DiCarlo and S. Quiligotti, Growth and balance, Mechanics Research Communications, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 449-456, 2002.