Proinnovative Policy and the National Innovation System a case study from Poland

Open access

Abstract

The article explores the main elements of the creation a proinnovation policy in Poland as a new case of public policy. It analyses the current status of proinnovation policy in Poland and the relationships implicit in the Polish National Innovation System. The findings support the conclusion that Polish proinnovation policy and the system through which it is enacted are at an early stage of development which is characteristic of co-called ‘catching-up’ countries. The findings show that there is a need for the strategic and holistic management of this type of sub-functional system to enable it to support SMEs in the development of their capacity for innovation. This should include a wide range of public and private institutions in the context of multi-stage governance.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Black J. Lodge M. Theatcher M. 2005 Regulatory Innovation. A Comparative Analysis Cheltenham E. Elgar Northampton.

  • Blaug M. 1995 Metodologia ekonomii PWN Warszawa.

  • Buchanan J. 1997 Finanse publiczne w warunkach demokracji PWN Warszawa.

  • Edqiust C. 2004 Systems of Innovation-A Critical Review of the State of the Art [in:] Handbook of Innovation J. Fagerberg D. Mowery R. Nelson Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Etzkowitz H. Leydesdorff L. 2000 The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations Research Policy vol. 29 n.2.

  • Goodin RE (ed.) 1996 The Theory of Institutional Design Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • Jessop B. 2002 The Future of the Capitalist State Cambridge Polity Cambridge.

  • Jessop B. Sum N.-L. 2006 Beyond the Regulation Approach. Putting Capitalist State in its Place Cheltenham E. Elgar Northampton.

  • Kapitał intelektualny dla zrównoważonego wzrostu. Kapitał intelektualny jako długookresowy priorytet Polski z perspektywy członkostwa w Unii Europejskiej oraz Prezydencji Polski w Radzie Unii Europejskiej w 2011 roku MNiSW Warszawa 25.08.2010.

  • Konecki K. 2000 Studia z metodologii badań jakościowych. Teoria ugruntowana PWN Warszawa.

  • Kooiman J. 2000 Societal governance. Levels modes and orders of social-political interaction [in:] Debating Governance: Authority Steering and Democracy Oxford University Press Oxford.

  • Lipsey R. 1989 An Introduction to Positive Economics Weidenfeld & Nicolson London.

  • Löffler E. 2003 Governance and Government. Networking with External Stakeholders [in:] Public Management and Governance T. Bovaird E. Löffler (ed.) London-New York.

  • Majone G. 2004 Dowody argumenty perswazja w procesie politycznym Wydawnictwo Scholar Warszawa.

  • Metcalfe S. 1995 The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy: Equalibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives [in:] Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change P. Stoneman (ed.) London.

  • OECD 2007 Policy Mix for innovation policy in Poland-key issues and policy recommendations DSTI/STP/TIP(2006)13 FINAL Paris-Warsaw.

  • Oslo Manual 2008 Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data OECD Paris.

  • Parsons T. 1977 Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Systems New York.

  • Silvermann D. 2009 Interpretacja danych jakościowych. Metody analizy rozmowy tekstu i interakcji PWN Warszawa.

  • Varblane U. Dyker D. Tamm D. 2007 How to improve the National Innovation Systems of catching-up economies [in:] Trames 11(61/56) Tartu.

  • Założenia systemu zarządzania rozwojem Polski 2009 Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego Warszawa.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 218 112 0
PDF Downloads 98 69 1