‘New History—the New Ways of Knowing and Remembering the Caucasus in Poland’

Justyna Pierzynska 1
  • 1 University of Helsinki


This paper aims to reconstruct the knowledge claims and memory politics in Polish public discourse about the Caucasus. As it highlights the importance of history and a production of a ‘New History’ for political use, it illuminates the role of the visual dimension in the symbolic politics of memory in Poland. The special example of the Caucasus, particularly the places of Georgia and Russia, serves to show how peripheral regions can gain prominence in the knowledge struggles and strategies of self-representation and othering of particular nations, regions and states on the geopolitical plane.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Batiashvili, N., ‘The “Myth” of the Self: The Georgian National Narrative and Quest for Georgianness’, in A. Assmann, L. Shortt, (eds.), Memory and Political Change, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 186–200.

  • Berger, P.L. and Luckmann T., The Social Construction of Reality, London, Penguin Books, 1966.

  • ‘Błaszczak: Najpierw Gruzja, potem Ukraina, później kraje nadbałtyckie, następnie nasza kolej’, TVP.info [website], 24 August 2014, http://www.tvp.info/16557612/blaszczak-najpierw-gruzja-potem-ukraina-pozniej-panstwa-nadbaltyckie-nastepnie-nasza-kolej, (accessed 1 June 2016).

  • Bobiński, K., Polish Foreign Policy 2005–2007, Warsaw, Institute of Public Affairs, 2007.

  • Bohun, M., ‘Oblicza obsesji—negatywny obraz Rosji w myśli polskiej’, in A. deLazari, (ed.), Katalog wzajemnych uprzedzeń Polaków i Rosjan, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, Warszawa, 2006, pp. 203–302.

  • Bourdieu, P., Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge, Polity, 1991.

  • Cornell, S.E., Small Nations and Great Powers. A Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict in the Caucasus, London & New York, Routledge Curzon, 2001.

  • Cornell, S.E., Popjanevski, J. and Nillson, N., Russia’s War in Georgia: Causes and Implications for Georgia and the World, Washington, Central Asia—Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, 2008.

  • Daddow, O. J., ‘Euroscepticism and the culture of the discipline of history’, Review of International Studies, vol. 32, no. 2, 2006, pp. 309–328.

  • Davies, N., ‘Polish National Mythologies’, in G. Schöpflin, G. Hosking (eds.), Myths and Nationhood, New York, Routledge, 1997, pp. 14–157.

  • De Bruyn, D., ‘Patriotism of Tomorrow? The Commemoration and Popularization of the Warsaw Rising Through Comics’, Slovo, vol. 22, no. 2, 2010, pp. 46–65.

  • De Lazari, A. And Riabow, O., ‘NiedźwiedziaMetaforaRosji w dyskursie o konflikciegruzińsko-rosyjskim’, TygodnikPrzegląd [website], 14 September 2008, http://www.tygodnikprzeglad.pl/misza-niedzwiedz/, (accessed 7 July 2016).

  • Dittmer, J., Popular Culture, Geopolitics, and Identity, Plymouth, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010.

  • ‘Dobry przyklad prezydenta’, Sygnały dnia, Program 1 Polskiego Radia [radio broadcast], 22 April 2008, http://www.polskieradio.pl/7/129/Artykul/217814,Dobry-przyklad-prezydenta-w-sprawie-Gruzji, (accessed 4 July 2016).

  • Domagała, M., Percepcja konfliktu kaukaskiego w polskich mediach w 2008 r.,Warsaw, Europejskie Centrum Analiz Geopolitycznych, 2014.

  • Dudek, A., ‘Political Assessment of the Past in Poland’, in R. Stemplowski, (ed.), Europe and Latin America: Looking at Each Other?, Warsaw, Polish Institute of International Affairs, 2010, pp. 303–330.

  • Freedberg, D., The Power of Images: Studies in the History and Theory of Response, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1991.

  • Gunning, T., ‘What’s the Point of an Index? Or, Faking Photographs’, NORDICOM Review, vol. 25, no. 1/2, 2004, pp. 39–49.

  • Hackmann, J., ‘Collective Memories in the Baltic Sea Region and Beyond: National—Transnational—European?’, Journal of Baltic Studies, vol. 39, no. 4, 2008, pp. 381-391.

  • Jaźwiński, P., Eisler, J., Oficerowie i dżentelmeni. Życie prywatne i służbowe kawalerzystów Drugiej Rzeczypospolitej, Warszawa, Instytut Wydawniczy Erica, 2011.

  • Keller, R., ‘Analysing Discourse. An Approach from the Sociology of Knowledge’, FQS, vol. 6, no. 3, 2005.

  • Keller, R., ‘The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD)’, Human Studies, vol. 34, no. 1, 2011, pp. 43–65.

  • Kolbaia, D., Hlebowicz P. and Warisch P., Gruzjanieznana. Wspólne losy Gruzinów i Polaków, Kraków, Rafael, 2011.

  • Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T., Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design, London, Routledge, 1996.

  • Kuus, M., ‘Whose Regional Expertise? Political geographies of knowledge in the European Union’, European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, 2011, pp. 275–288.

  • Kuhn, A., 1985, The Power of the Image. Essays on Representation and Sexuality, New York, Routledge, 1995.

  • Lehti M., Jutila M. and Jokisipilä M., Never-Ending Second World War: Public Performances of National Dignity and the Drama of the Bronze Soldier, Journal of Baltic Studies vol. 39, no. 4, 2008, pp. 393–418.

  • Łapczyński, M., ‘The European Union’s Eastern Partnership: Chances and Perspectives’, Caucasian Review of International Affairs, vol. 3, no. 2, 2009, pp. 143–155.

  • Malek, M., ‘Georgia & Russia: The Unknown Prelude to the Five Day War’, Caucasian Review of International Affairs, Vol. 3, no. 2, 2009, pp. 227–232.

  • Mälksoo, M., ‘The Memory Politics of Becoming European’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 15, no. 4, 2009, pp. 653–680.

  • Michlic, J. B., ‘The Path of Bringing the Dark to Light: Memory of the Holocaust in Postcommunist Europe’, in M. Pakier, J. Wawrzyniak, (eds.), Memory and Change in Europe. Eastern Perspectives, New York-Oxford, Berghahn Books, 2015, pp. 115–130.

  • Mink, G. and Neumayer, L., History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Memory Games, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

  • Mirzoeff, N., An Introduction to Visual Culture, New York, Routledge, 1999.

  • Nowak, A., ‘Murder in the Cemetery: Memorial Clashes over the Victims of the Soviet-Polish Wars’, in U. Blacker, A. Etkind and J. Fedor, (eds.), Memory and Theory in Eastern Europe, New York, Palgrave MacMillan, 2013, pp. 149–172.

  • Ostrowski, M., Co z tą Rosją. Polska a konflikt gruzińsko-rosyjski, Polityka, 22 August 2008, http://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/swiat/265668,1,polska-a-konflikt-rosyjsko-gruzinski.read, (accessed 10 July 2016).

  • Orzechowski, M., ‘Rosyjska chora potrzeba wojny i cierpienia’, Stowarzyszenie Dziennikarzy Polskich [website], 1 December 2015, http://www.sdp.pl/felietony/12092,rosyjska-chora-potrzeba-wojny-i-cierpienia,1448998949, (accessed 30 May 2016).

  • Pierzynska, J., ‘Brothers in Arms. Imagining a Meta-Historical Brotherhood of Georgia and Poland in Polish Media and Political Discourses’, Journal for Discourse Studies, vol. 2, 2016, pp. 178–190.

  • Pilawski, K., ‘Historia i polityka’, Przegląd socjalistyczny, undated [website], http://www.przeglad-socjalistyczny.pl/opinie/aziemski/48-historia-i-polityka, (accessed 15 November 2015).

  • ‘PiS zapowiada systemową politykę historyczną’, Dziennik.pl [website], http://wiadomosci.dziennik.pl/historia/aktualnosci/artykuly/502467,prawo-i-sprawiedliwosc-zapowiada-systemowa-polityke-historyczna.html, (accessed 10 July 2016).

  • Prizel, I., National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.

  • Polish Film Festival in Los Angeles [website], Wearing a four-cornered cap and a tiger skin, 2008, http://www.polishfilmla.org/wocms.php?siteID=12&ID=306, (accessed 15 May 2015).

  • Reeves, Ch., ‘Reopening the Wounds of History? The Foreign Policy of the “Fourth” Polish Republic’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 26, no. 4, 2010, pp. 518–541.

  • Reichel, P., Politik mit der Errinerung: Gedächtnisorte im Streit um die nazionalsozialistische Vergangenheit, München, Hanser, 1995.

  • Sanford, G., ‘Overcoming the burden of history in Polish foreign policy’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 19, no. 3, 2003, pp.178–203.

  • ‘Są wartości, za które płaci się życiem. 70 rocznica powstania [relacja minuta po minucie], TVP.info [website], 1 August 2014, http://www.tvp.info/16264033/sa-wartosci-za-ktore-placi-sie-zyciem-70-rocznica-powstania-relacja-minuta-po-minucie, (accessed 1 July 2016).

  • Sommer, V., ‘The Online Discourse on The Demjanjuk Trial. New Memory Practices on World Wide Web?’, ESACHESS. Journal for Communication Studies, vol. 5, no. 2(10), 2012, pp. 133–151.

  • Stobiecki, R., Rosja i Rosjanie w polskiej myśli historycznej XIX i XX wieku, in A. deLazari, (ed.), Katalog wzajemnych uprzedzeń Polaków i Rosjan, Warszawa, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, 2006, pp. 159–201.

  • Szczepanik, M.,‘Between a Romantic ‘Mission in the East’ and Minimalism: Polish Policy Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood’, Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 2, 2011, pp. 45–66.

  • Tamm, M.,‘History as Cultural Memory: Mnemohistory and the Construction of the Estonian Nation’, Journal of Baltic Studies vol. 39, no. 4, 2008, pp. 499–516.

  • Tazbir, J., ‘Poland. Antemurale or bridge?’, Dialogue and Universalism vol. 9, no. 5/6, 1999, pp. 71–82.

  • Valaskivi, K. and J. Sumiala, ‘Circulating social imaginaries: Theoretical and methodological reflections’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, 2014, pp. 229–243.

  • Wagner, G., ‘Nationalism and Cultural Memory in Poland: The European Union Turns East’, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, vol. 17, no. 2, 2003, pp. 191–212.

  • Wiącek, E., ‘In the labyrinth of memory. Images of the Warsaw Uprising of 1944’, Journal of Urban Ethnology, vol. 11, 2013, pp. 85–103.

  • Woźniak, A., ‘Z badań nad Polonią gruzińską drugiej połowy XIX i początku XX wieku’, Etnografia Polska, vol. 40, 1996, pp. 255–273.

  • Wąsowski, M., ‘Szał na Powstanie Warszawskie. Czemu nagle stało się tak popularne?’, Natemat.pl [website], 2012, http://natemat.pl/25617,szal-na-powstanie-warszawskie-czemu-nagle-stalo-sie-tak-popularne-przez-muzeum-muzyke-i-pis, (accessed on 20 November 2015).

  • Zubrzycki, G., ‘Polish Mythology and the Traps of Messianic Martyrology’, in G. Bouchard (ed.), National Myths. Constructed Pasts, Contested Presents, New York, London, Routledge, 2013, pp. 110–132.

  • Zarycki, T., ‘From Soviet to a Western-dominated political scene: the geopolitical context of politics in Poland’, in B. Törnquist-Plewa, K. Stala, (eds.), Cultural Transformations after Communism: Central and Eastern Europe in Focus, Lund, Nordic Academic Press, 2011, pp. 82–108.

  • Zarycki T., ‘The embarrassing Russian connection. Selective memory of the Russian heritage in contemporary Poland’, in R. Taras (ed.), Russia’s Identity in International Relations. Images, Perceptions, Misperceptions, London, Routledge, 2013, pp. 133–149.

  • Zhurzhenko, T., ‘Geopolitics of Memory’, Eurozine, 2007, http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2007-05-10-zhurzhenko-en.html, (accessed 9 April 2016).

  • Zhurzhenko, T., ‘Geopolitics of Memory: Rethinking World War II and the fight for hegemony in the Baltic-Black Sea Region’, Perekrestki Digest, no. 6, 2011, pp. 116–133.

  • Wieloletni Program Współpracy Rozwojowej 2012-2015 [Longstanding Development Aid Programme 2012–2015]. Available from: https://www.polskapomoc.gov.pl/Wieloletni,program,wspolpracy,rozwojowej,przyjety,1364.html, (accessed 19 July 2016).


Journal + Issues