Effects of Sidr honey on second-intention healing of contaminated full-thickness skin wounds in healthy dogs

Open access


The therapeutic effects of Sidr honey on second-intention healing of contaminated full-thickness skin wounds in dogs were investigated. Povidone-iodine was used as a standard treatment and served as a control. Healthy adult (two-to-four-year-old) mongrels, comprising six dogs and two bitches, were divided into four equal groups in order to obtain multi-aged wounds at the end of the study. Four 2cm × 2cm full-thickness skin wounds were created on both sides of the back area of each dog under general anaesthesia adhering to aseptic technique. Contaminated wounds were then divided into two treatment groups: Group 1, Sidr honey treated (right side wounds) and group 2, povidone-iodine treated (left side wounds). All wounds were evaluated grossly daily at the time of treatment application and digitally photographed once every week. Images were analysed using ImageJ software. The parameters of unhealed wound area and length of advancing epithelium were obtained. The epithelialisation areas, percentage of wound area, and wound contraction rate were then calculated. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups in any of the parameters studied. Overall, both honey treated and iodine treated wounds healed well within the time period of the study (28 d). However, the study showed a beneficial effect of Sidr honey on second-intention healing of full thickness contaminated wounds in healthy dogs and the effect was comparable to that of Povidone iodine.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Abdel-Wahed R.E. El-Kammar M.H. Korittum A.S. Edrees I.R.: Surgical and histological evaluation of the effectiveness of propolis on wound healing. Alexandria J Vet Sci 2013 39 52–63.

  • 2. Adams C.J. Manley-Harris M. Molan P.C.: The origin of methylglyoxal in New Zealand manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honey. Carbohydr Res 2009 344 1050–1053.

  • 3. Al-Waili N. Salom K. Al-Ghamdi A.A.: Honey for wound healing ulcers and burns; data supporting its use in clinical practice. SciWorld J 2011 11 766–787.

  • 4. Alzubier A. Okechukwu P.: Investigation of anti-inflammatory antipyretic and analgesic effect of Yemeni Sidr Honey. World Acad Sci Engin Technol 2011 5 41–46.

  • 5. Bani Ismail Z. Alshehabat M. Hananeh W. Daradka M. Ali J. El-Najjar E.: Recent advances in topical wound healing products with special reference to honey: a review. Res Opin Vet Sci 2015 5 76–83.

  • 6. Bischofberger A.S. Dart C.M. Perkins N.R. Kelly A. Jeffcott L. Dart A.J.: The effect of short- and long-term treatment with manuka honey on second intention healing of contaminated and noncontaminated wounds on the distal aspect of the forelimbs in horses. Vet Surg 2013 42 154–160.

  • 7. Demir A. Şimsek T. Engin M.S. Yildiz L.: The effect of topical honey dressing on wound healing in diabetic mice. Gazi Med J 2007 18 110–113.

  • 8. Esmaeelian B. Najafi O. Aldavood S.J. Jalali F.S.S. Farshid A.A. Rahmani S.: Clinical and histopathological evaluations of local honey application in the healing of experimental wounds in dog. J Vet Res 2012 63 265–271.

  • 9. Fischbach M.A.: Antibiotics from microbes: converging to kill. Curr Opin Microbiol 2009 12 520–527.

  • 10. Hammond E.N. Donkor E.S.: Antibacterial effect of manuka honey on Clostridium difficile. BMC Res Notes 2013 6 188.

  • 11. Hwisa N.T. Katakam P. Chandu B.R. Abadi E.G. Shefha E.M.: Comparative in vivo evaluation of three types of honey on topical wound healing activity in rabbits. J Appl Pharm Sci 2013 3 139–143.

  • 12. Jull A.B. Walker N. Deshpande S.: Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Re. 2015 Mar 6;3: CD005083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005083.pub4.

  • 13. Kandemir F.M. Sagliyan A. Ozkaraca M. Gunay C. Han M.C. Benzer F.: Effects of oral administrations of pomegranate seed extract on surgical wound healing in rabbits. Revue Méd Vét 2013 164 400–408.

  • 14. Kwakman P.H. Van den Akker J.P. Guclu A. Aslami H. Binnekade J.M. De Boer L. Boszhard L. Paulus F. Middelhoek P. te Velde A.A. Vandenbroucke-Grauls C.M. Schultz M.J. Zaat S.A.: Medical-grade honey kills antibiotic-resistant bacteria in vitro and eradicates skin colonization. Clin Infect Dis 2008 46 1677–1682.

  • 15. Marques S.R. Peixoto C.A. Messias J.B. De Albuquerque A.R. Silva Junior V.A.: The effects of topical application of sunflower-seed oil on open wound healing in lambs. Acta Cirurg Brasil 2004 19 196–209.

  • 16. Mavric E. Wittmann S. Barth G. Henle T.: Identification and quantification of methylglyoxal as the dominant antibacterial constituent of manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honeys from New Zealand. Mol Nutr Food Res 2008 52 483–489.

  • 17. Molan P.C.: The evidence and the rationale for the use of honey as a wound dressing. Wound Pract Res 201119 204–221.

  • 18. Nisbet H.O. Nisbet C. Yarim M. Guler A. Ozak A.: Effects of three types of honey on cutaneous wound healing. Wounds 2010 22 275–283.

  • 19. Overgaauw P.A. Kirpensteijn J.: Honey in treatment of skin wounds. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 2005 130 115–116.

  • 20. Sarabahi S.: Recent advances in topical wound care. Indian J Plast Surg 2012 45 379–387.

  • 21. Sazegar G. Seyed Reza A.H. Behravan E.: The effects of supplemental zinc and honey on wound healing in rats. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2011 14 391–398.

  • 22. Stojadinovic A. Carlson J.W. Schultz G.S. Davis T.A. Elster E.A.: Topical advances in wound care. Gynecol Oncol 2008 111 70–80.

  • 23. Subrahmanyam M.: Topical application of honey for burn wound treatment - an overview. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2007 20 137–139.

  • 24. Sukur S.M. Halim A.S. Singh K.K.: Evaluations of bacterial contaminated full thickness burn wound healing in Sprague Dawley rats treated with Tualang honey. Indian J Plast Surg 2011 44 112–117.

  • 25. Tang J. Liu H. Gao C. Mu L. Yang S. Rong M. Zhang Z. Liu J. Ding Q. Lai R.: A small peptide with potential ability to promote wound healing. PLoS One 2014 e92082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092082.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0,829
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0,938

CiteScore 2018: 0.68

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.291
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.501

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 565 287 9
PDF Downloads 217 123 7