Background: In this paper the well-known risk measurement method Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is applied to the Croatian stock market to estimate the risk for 8 sectors in Croatia. The method and an appropriate backtesting are applied to the sample of 29 stocks grouped into 8 sectors for the three different periods: the period of economic growth 2006-2007, the crisis period 2008-2009 and the post-crisis period 2013-2014, characterized by long-term economic stagnation in Croatia. Objectives: The objective of this paper is to estimate the risk of 8 sectors on the Croatian stock market in three different economic periods and to identify whether the sectors that are risky during the crisis period are the same sectors that are risky in the period of economic growth and economic stagnation. Methods/Approach: The Conditional Value-at-Risk method and an appropriate backtesting are applied. Results: Empirical findings indicate that sectors that are risky in the period of economic growth are not the same sectors that are risky during the period of economic crisis or stagnation. Conclusions: In all the three periods, the least risky sectors were Hotel-management, Tourism, Food, and Staples Retailing. The Construction sector in all the three periods was among the riskiest sectors
1. Acerbi, C., Tasche, D. (2002), “On the coherence of expected shortfall”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 1487-1503.
2. Allen, D. E., Kramadibrata, A. R., Powell, R. J., Singh, A. K. (2012), ”Identifying European Industries with Extreme Default Risk: Application of CVaR Techniques to Transition Matrices”, World Review of Business Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 46-58.
3. Anić, I. D. (2017), “Sektorske analize - Trgovina na malo” (Sectoral Analysis - Retail), Sektorske analize, Vol. 6, No. 52, pp. 1-23.
4. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., Heath, D. (1999), “Coherent Measures of Risk”, Mathematical Finance, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 203-228.
5. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2004), “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework”, Bank for International Settlements, available at: http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs107.pdf (30 May 2017).
6. Buturac, G. (2017), “Sektorske analize - Građevinarstvo i nekretnine” (Sectoral Analysis -Construction and Real Estate), Sektorske analize, Vol. 6, No. 56, pp. 1-23.
7. Dowd, K. (2002), “Measuring market risk”, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, New York.
8. Hafsa, H. (2015), “CVaR in Portfolio Optimization: An Essay on the French Market”, International Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 101-111.
9. Jerončić, M., Aljinović, Z. (2011), “Formiranje optimalnog portfelja pomoću Markowitzevog modela uz sektorsku podjelu kompanija” (Creating an optimal portfolio using Markowitz's model with a sectoral division of the companies), Ekonomski pregled, Vol. 62, No. 9-10, pp. 583-606.
10. Krokhmal, P., Palmquist, J., Uryasev, S. (2002), “Portfolio optimization with ConditionalValue-at-Risk Objective and Constraints”, The Journal of Risk, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 11-27.
11. Letmark, M. (2010), “Robustness of Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) when measuring market risk across different asset classes”, Master's thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, available at: http://arc.hhs.se/download.aspx?MediumId=189/ (21 August 2017).
12. Mirošević, H. (2015), “Sektorske analize - Turizam” (Sectoral Analysis - Tourism), Sektorske analize, Vol. 4, No. 41, pp. 1-15.
13. Pérignon, C., Smith D. R. (2010), “The level and quality of Value-at-Risk disclosure by commercial banks”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 362-377.
15. Rootzen, H., Kluppelberg, C. (1999), “A single number can't hedge against econoic catastrophes”, Ambio, Vol. 28, No.6, pp. 550-555.
16. Sharma M. (2012), “The Historical Simulation Method for Value-at-Risk: A Research Based Evaluation of the Production Favourite”, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2042594 (25 February 2018).
17. Tran, N. P., Vo, D. H., Pham, T. N. (2017), “Measuring market risks for industries in Vietnam: the VaR and CVaR approaches”, available at: http://veam.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12/46.-Tran-Phu-Ngoc.pdf (7 January 2018).
18. Uryasev, S. (2000), “Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR): Optimization Algorithms and Applications”, Financial Engineering News, No. 14, pp. 1-5.
19. Uryasev, S., Serriano, G., Sarykalin, S. (2008): “Value-at-Risk vs. Conditional Value-at-Risk in Risk Management and Optimization”, Tutorials in Operation Research, INFORMS, available at: http://www.ise.ufl.edu/uryasev/files/2011/11/VaR_vs_CVaR_INFORMS.pdf (30 May 2017)
20. Van den Goorbergh, R. W. J., Vlaar, P. (1999), “Value-at-Risk Analysis of Stock Returns Historical Simulation, Variance Techniques or Tail Indeks Estimation?”, De Nederlandsche Bank Staff Reports, No. 40, available at: https://www.dnb.nl/binaries/sr040_tcm46-146818.pdf (30 May 2017).
21. Žic, T. (2008), “Pad indeksa vozarina pridonio urušavanju brodarskih dionica” (The decline in the cargo index contributed to the collapse of shipping shares), Poslovni dnevnik, available at: http://www.poslovni.hr/burze/pad-indeksa-vozarina-pridonio-urusavanjubrodarskih-dionica-96691 (7 January 2018).