Open access


Background: Learning Management Systems (LMS) represent one of the main technology to support learning in HE institutions. However, every educational institution differs in its experience with the usage of these systems. South East European University’s LMS experience is longer than a decade. From last year SEE – University is adopting Google Classroom (GC) as an LMS solution.

Objectives: Identifying factors which encourage LMS activities, with special emphasis on SEEU, might be of crucial importance for Higher Education academic leaders as well as software developers who design tools related to fostering LMS.

Methods/Approach: This paper introduces new approach of investigating the usage of LMS, i.e. identifying the determinants of increasing usage of LMS activities, by conducting empirical analysis for the case of SEEU. We apply appropriate estimation technique such as OLS methodology.

Results: Using SEEU Usage Google Classroom Report & Analysis Data for spring semester (2016–2017) and winter semester (2017–2018) - SUGCR dataset 2017, we argue that (i) LMS activities are affected by demographic characteristics and (ii) the students’ LMS usage is affected by level and resources of instructors’ LMS usage.

Conclusions: The empirical results show positive relationship between student and instructors’ LMS usage.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Abazi-Bexheti L. Dika Z. Alili H. (2009) “Analysis Report of Survey Results About The Usage Of A Learning Management System” International Conference on e-Education and eLearning Vol. 54 World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology Paris pp. 225-229.

  • 2. Abazi-Bexheti L. Dika Z. Besimi A. (2008) “In house Development of Learning Managment Systems Using Modular Approach” Proceedings of Ed-Media World Conference on Educational Multimedia Hypermedia & Telecommunications Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Vienna pp. 5915-5920.

  • 3. Abazi-Bexheti L. Kadriu A. Ahmedi L. (2010) “Measurement and Assessment of Learning Management System Usage” 6th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on educational technologies (EDUTE '10) Kantaoui Sousse Tunisia pp. 183-186.

  • 4. Aberdeen Group (2008). Research brief: The rice of Learning Management Systems in Talent Management Systems Abeerden Boston.

  • 5. Alghamdi S. R. Bayaga A. (2016) “Use and attitude towards Learning Management Systems (LMS) in Saudi Arabian universities“ Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education Vol. 12 No. 9 pp. 2309-2330.

  • 6. Alshammari M. S. (2015) „Academics' Adoption and Usage of Learning Management Systems“ available at: (30 March 2017)

  • 7. Bersin J. Howard C. O’ Leonard K. Mallon D. (2009). Learning Management Systems2009: Facts Practice Analysis Trends and Provider Profiles Bersin & Associates.

  • 8. Coşkunçay D. F. Özkan S. (2013) “A Model for Instructors’ Adoption of Learning Management Systems: Empirical Validation in Higher Education Context” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 12 No. 2 pp. 13-25.

  • 9. Dyson M. C. Baretto Campello S. (2003) “Evaluating Virtual Learning Environments: what are we measuring?” Electronic Journal of e-Learning Vol. 1 No. 1 pp. 11-20.

  • 10. Janossy J. (2008) “Proposed Model for Evaluating C/LMS Faculty Usage in Higher Education Institutions” Immersed In Learning 13th Annual Instructional Technology Conference Middle Tennessee State University Murfreesboro.

  • 11. Lonn S. Teasley S. D. (2009) “Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems” Computers & Education Vol. 53 No. 3 pp. 686-694.

  • 12. McQuiggan C. A. (2007) “The role of faculty development in online teaching’s potential to question teaching beliefs and assumptions” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration Vol. 10 No. 3.

  • 13. Menard S. (2009). Logistic Regression: From Introductory to Advanced Concepts and Applications SAGE Publications.

  • 14. Mohd Ayub A. F. Tarmizi R. A. Wan J. Wan M. Wan A. Wan Z. Luan W.S. (2010) “Factors Influencing Students’ Use a Learning Management System Portal: Perspective from Higher Education Students” International Journal of Education and Information Technologies Vol. 2 No. 4 pp. 101-108.

  • 15. Morris M. G. Venkatesh V. (2000) “Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force” Personnel Psychology Vol. 53 No. 2 pp. 375-403.

  • 16. Nicholson P. (2007) “A history of E-learning” in Fernández-Manjón B. Sánchez-Pérez J. M. Gómez-Pulido J. A. Vega-Rodríguez M. A. Bravo-Rodríguez J. (Eds) Computers and education Springer Dordrecht pp. 1-11.

  • 17. Orfanou K. Tselios N. Katsanos C. (2015) “Perceived usability evaluation of learning management systems: Empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16 No. 2 pp. 227-246.

  • 18. Pardamean B. Susanto M. (2012) “Assessing User Acceptance toward Blog Technology Using the UTAUT Model” International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation Vol. 6 No. 1 pp. 203-212.

  • 19. Shehu V. Besimi A. Abazi-Bexheti L. Shaqiri M. (2009) “Usability Issues While Building A New LMS” Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces SRCE Cavtat Croatia pp. 317-322.

  • 20. Wichadee S. (2015) “Factors Related to Faculty Members’ Attitude and Adoption of a Learning ManagementSystem” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 14 No. 4 pp. 53-61.

  • 21. Woolley D. R. (1994) “PLATO: The Emergence of Online Community” available at (15 December 2008)

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.57

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.165
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.388

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 928 484 34
PDF Downloads 670 376 30