Exploring the Motivation of Employees in a Firm: A Case-Study

Igor Klopotan 1 , Trina Mjeda 1 , and Petar Kurečić 1
  • 1 University North, , Koprivnica, Croatia

Abstract

Background: General concept of motivation, which include the motivational techniques and human resources management as a prerequisite for the most important intangible asset is related to the company performance.

Objectives: we build on the conceptual model examining the respondents’ attitudes about the influence of various parameters on better business performance and work atmosphere. In addition, we also examine the attitudes towards the impact of motivation, company management, and communication on employee satisfaction.

Methods/Approach: Difference in the perception of essential parameters such as motivation, communication, leadership model, and personnel management within a company, over groups of respondents differentiated by gender and age is tested using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

Results: The results obtained by this research conducted from an employee point of view, detect the difference in the perception of the parameters of motivation, communication, leadership and personnel management, and their impact on employee satisfaction.

Conclusions: Our empirical research results clearly pinpoint the link between successful application of motivational techniques, quality of the leadership and employee satisfaction.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Danish, R. Q., Khan, K. M., Shahid, A. U., Raza, I., Humayon, A. A. (2015), “Effect of intrinsic rewards on task performance of employees: Mediating role of motivation”, International Journal of Organizational Leadership, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 33-46.

  • 2. Horvat, J., Sharma, K., Bobek, S. (2015), “Knowledge Sharing and Performance Appraisal of Employees: a Pilot Case Study”, Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 62-73.

  • 3. Jerry, R. H. (2013), “Leadership and Followership”, University of Toledo Law Review, Vol. 44, pp. 345-354.

  • 4. Jha, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Fernandes, C. (2016), „Human Resource Development Management & Training as Antecedents for Strategy Integration”, The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 129-143.

  • 5. Joo, B. K., Jeung, C. W., Yoon, H. J. (2010), “Investigating the influences of core self-evaluations, job autonomy, and intrinsic motivation on in-role job performance”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol. 21, No.4, pp. 353-371.

  • 6. Kehoe, R. R., Wright, P. M. (2013), “The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors”, Journal of Management, Vol. 39, No.2, pp. 366-391.

  • 7. Kim, S., Feldt, L. S. (2008), “A Comparison of Tests for Equality of Two or More Independent Alpha Coefficients”, Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 179-193.

  • 8. Klopotan, I., Buntak, K., Drožđek, I. (2016), “Employee Loyalty: Differences between Genders and the Public and the Private Sector”, Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 303-313.

  • 9. Lazaroiu, G. (2015), “Employee Motivation and Job Performance”, Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, Vol.14, pp. 97-102.

  • 10. Liu, B. C. (2009), “Evidence of Public Service Motivation of Social Workers in China”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 75, No.2, pp. 349-366.

  • 11. Liu, B. C., Tang, N. Y., Zhu, X. M. (2008), “Public Service Motivation and Job Satisfaction in China: An Investigation of Generalisability and Instrumentality”, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 684-699.

  • 12. Liu, B., Ping Tang, T. L., Yang, K. (2015), “When does Public Service Motivation fuel the Job Satisfaction Fire? The joint Moderation of Person–Organization fit and Needs–Supplies fit”, Public Management Review, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 876-900.

  • 13. Mitreva, E., Filiposki, O. (2012), “Proposal methodology of the subsystem-internal standardization as part of TQM system”, International Journal for Quality Research, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 251-258.

  • 14. Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K. (2007), “Finding Workable Levers over Work Motivation: Comparing Job Satisfaction, Job Involvement, and Organizational Commitment”, Administration & Society, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 803-832.

  • 15. Rožman, M., Treven, S., Čančer, V. (2017), “Motivation and Satisfaction of Employees in the Workplace“, Business Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 14-25.

  • 16. Vandenabeele, W. (2009), “The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment on Self-Reported Performance: More Robust Evidence of the PSM-Performance Relationship”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 75, No. 1, pp. 11-34.

  • 17. Yang, L. R., Huang, C. F., Hsu, T. J. (2014), “Knowledge Leadership to Improve Project and Organizational Performance”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 40-53.

  • 18. Yoon, H. J., Sung, S. Y., Choi, J. N., Lee, K., Kim, S. (2015), “Tangible and Intangible Rewards and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Situational Extrinsic Motivation”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 383-393.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search