Presence of Banks on Social Networks in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Open access


Background: Social networks allow real-time interaction that enhances a bank’s ability to respond to customers in a timely, intuitive and personalized manner. By using social networks, banks can improve the understanding of their clients and bank’s products they need. Also, banks can enhance relations with clients and strengthen their brand through raising client loyalty.

Objectives: The paper explores and analyses the current presence of banks in Bosnia and Herzegovina on social networks.

Methods/Approach: The paper studies the presence of 24 banks in Bosnia and Herzegovina on social networks and analyses the basic characteristics of profiles/pages of the banks on the most popular social networks.

Results: A half of the banks have their profiles/pages on different social networks (mostly on Facebook and YouTube). They use the profiles/pages mainly for content marketing, i.e. for presenting their business operations. Unfortunately, banks do not encourage interaction with clients, except through likes.

Conclusions: The analysis does not show that banks have a systematized and planned appearance on social networks. There is a plenty of room for improvement, and it is necessary primarily to address the interaction between clients and banks through social networks.

1. Aasheim, H., Stensønes, I. (2011), “Financial Institutions in Social Media, Deliver Traditional Service in New Channels; A Case Study of Danske Bank”, master's thesis, Copenhagen Business School, available at: (27 May 2016).

2. Auer, M. R. (2011), „The Policy Sciences of Social Media”, The Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 709-732.

3. Black, E. (2016), „Using Social Media During a Crisis”, available at: (16 July 2017).

4. Bukovina, J. (2016a), “Social media and capital markets. An overview”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 220, pp. 70–78.

5. Bukovina, J. (2016b), “Social media big data and capital markets - An overview”, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Vol. 11, pp. 18-26.

6. Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina (2016), “Banks operating in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, available at: (25 October 2016).

7. Chanda, R., Zaorski, S. (2013), “Social Media Usage in the Financial Services Industry: Toward a Business-Driven Compliance Approach”, Journal of Taxation & Regulation of Financial Institutions, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 5-20.

8. Crowe, A. (2010), “The Social Media Manifesto: A Comprehensive Review of The İmpact of Social Media on Emergency Management”, Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 409-420.

9. Doman, C. (2015), “6 Big Social Media Opportunities for Financial Services (and One Gap)”, available at: (27 July 2016).

10. Dougherty, J. (2015), “6 Social Media “Musts” for Crisis Communication”, available at: (16 July 2017).

11. Eldridge, R. (2016), “How Social Media Is Shaping Financial Services”, available at: (23 May 2016).

12. Groenfeldt, T. (2014), “Bank Clients Want Social Media Account Access”, available at: (11 October 2016).

13. Hazarika, D., Nag, S. (2014), “How Banks can use Social Media Analytics to drive Business Advantage”, publisher Cognizant, available at: (20 May 2017).

14. Jin, Y., Liu, B. F., Austin, L. L., (2014), „Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management: The Effects of Crisis Origin, Information Form, and Source on Publics’ Crisis Responses”, Communication Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 74-94.

15. Joseph, K., Wintoki, M. B., Zhang, Z. (2011), “Forecasting abnormal stock returns and trading volume using investor sentiment: Evidence from online search”, International Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 1116-1127.

16. Karabulut, Y. (2013), “Can Facebook Predict Stock Market Activity?”, available at: (18 May 2017).

17. King, B. (2010). Bank 2.0: How customer behavior and technology will change the future of financial services, Singapore, Marshall Cavendish Business.

18. Kumar, K. S. V., Devi, Dr. V. R. (2014), „Social Media in Financial Services - A Theoretical Perspective”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 11, pp. 306-313.

19. Mucan, B., Özeltürkay. E. Y. (2014) “Social Media Creates Competitive Advantages: How Turkish Banks Use This Power? A Content Analysis of Turkish Banks through Their Webpages”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 148, pp. 137-145.

20. Nguyen, T. H., Shirai, K., Velcin, J. (2015), “Sentiment Analysis on Social Media for Stock Movement Prediction”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, No. 24, pp. 9603-9611.

21. Pang, A., Hassan, N. B. B. A., Chong, A. C. Y. (2014), „Negotiating Crisis in the Social Media Environment: Evolution of Crisis Online, Gaining Credibility Offline”, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 96-118.

22. Shao, D., Shao, L. P. (2012), “The Effect of Social Media on the Financial Services Industry”, Journal of International Finance Studies, Vol. 12, No 4, pp. 109-114.

23. Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., Tumasjan, A., Welpe, I. M. (2014b), “News or Noise? Using Twitter to Identify and Understand Company-specific News Flow”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 41, No. 7-8, pp 791-830.

24. Sprenger, T. O., Tumasjan, A., Sandner, P. G., Welpe, I. M. (2014a), “Tweets and Trades: the Information Content of Stock Microblogs”, European Financial Management, Vol. 20, No, 5, pp. 926-957.

25. Sul, H. K., Dennis, A. R., Yuan, L. I. (2017), “Trading on Twitter: Using Social Media Sentiment to Predict Stock Returns”, Decision Science, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 454-488.

26. Veenswyk, M. (2013), “Leveraging Social Media in the Banking Industry”, available at: (27 May 2016).

27. Wendling, C., Radisch, J., Jacobzone, S. (2013), „The Use of Social Media in Risk and Crisis Communication”, OECD Working Papers On Public Governance, No. 24, OECD Publishing, available at: (27 July 2016).

Business Systems Research Journal

The Journal of Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.57

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.165
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.388


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 246 152 11
PDF Downloads 100 77 8