Knowledge-cum-values Management belongs to the Way out from Global Crisis

Abstract

Background: The contemporary world-wide socio-economic crisis tends to escalate and contribute to the global crisis. Limitation of education to one-sided ‘knowledge management’ rather than socially responsible ‘knowledge-cum-values-management’ is one of the crisis’s causes. Objectives: The limitations to current knowledge management should be analyzed with systemic thinking. Which values are prevailing in it now and which values will enable the survival of humankind? Methods/Approach: In the first part, literature is reviewed for analysis and conceptual generalization of knowledge management. The theoretical framework based on ‘system theory’, ‘knowledge management’ and ‘knowledge-cum-values management’, and ‘values of social responsibility’ is introduced. In the second part a new theoretical concept “A potential methodological support for human transition from one-sided to requisitely holistic behavior via social responsibility” is discussed. Results: Knowledge management is a too narrow concept, it tends to leave aside human values, an impact on the natural environment, and extremely growing differences. Humankind needs consideration of responsibility, interdependence and holism in order to minimize detrimental impact of individual behaviour on society, i.e. humans and nature. Conclusions: The research indicates that individuals should attain more requisite holism, and should not be irrational by trying to attain only rationalism in human decision-making and action.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Bertalanffy, L. (1979). General Systems Theory, Foundations, Development, Applications, New York, Braziller.

  • 2. Botsaris, C., Vamvaka, V. (2016), „Attitude toward Entrepreneurship: Structure, Prediction from Behavioral Beliefs, and Relation to Entrepreneurial Intention”, Journal of Knowledge Economy, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 433-460.

  • 3. Camelo-Ordaz, C., Fernandez-Alles, M., Ruiz-Navarro, J., Sousa-Ginel, E. (2012), „The Intrapreneur and Innovation in Creative Firms”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 513-535.

  • 4. Carayannis, E. G., Pirzadeh, A., Popescu, D. (2014). Institutional Learning and Knowledge Transfer across Epistemic Communities: New Tools of Global Governance, New York, Springer.

  • 5. Carayannis, E., Campbell, D. (2009), „”Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystems“, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 46 No. 3-4, pp. 201-234.

  • 6. De Bono, E. (2005), „Šest klobukov razmišljanja (Six Thinking Hats, in Slovene)”, New Moment, No. 28 (entire journal).

  • 7. De Bono, E. (2006), „Lateralno razmišljanje (Lateral Thinking, in Slovene)”, New Moment, No. 30 (entire journal).

  • 8. De Bono, E. (2015). Enostavnost v razmišljanju (Simplicity in Thinking, in Slovene), Maribor, Založba Rotis.

  • 9. Drucker, P. (1969). The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society, New York, Harper and Row.

  • 10. Dubina, I., Carayannis, E., Campbell, D. (2012), “Creativity Economy and a Crisis of the Economy? Coevolution of Knowledge, Innovation, and Creativity, and of the Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Society”, Journal of Knowledge Economy, Vol. 3 No.1, pp. 1-24.

  • 11. Ečimović, T., Mulej M., et al. (2016), “The Sustainability and World Governing for Better Tomorrow and Survival of Homo sapiens Civilization”, in Proceedings of the 12 ECPD International Conference “Future of the World between Globalization and Regionalization”, Belgrade, October 28th and 29th 2016.

  • 12. European Union (2011), “Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions: A Renewed EU Strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility”, European Commission, Com (2011) 681 Final, Brussels.

  • 13. François, C. (Ed.) (2004). International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics, Munich, Saur.

  • 14. Howkins, J. (2001). The creative economy: How people make money from ideas, London, Penguin.

  • 15. International Standard Organization (2010), “ISO 26000”, available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/discovering_iso_26000.pdf (10 October 2016)

  • 16. Kaufman, B. E. (2015), „Market competition, HRM, and firm performance: The conventional paradigm critiqued and reformulated”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107-125.

  • 17. Korten, D. (2009), Agenda for a New Economy: From Phantom Wealth to Real Wealth, San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler.

  • 18. Kuratko, D. (2016). Entrepreneurship: Theory, Process, and Practice, Nashville, Cencage/South-Western Publisher.

  • 19. Lafley, A., Johnson, M. (2010). Seizing the White Space: Business Model Innovation for Growth and Renewal, Boston, Harvard Business Press.

  • 20. Leiponen, A., Helfat, C. (2010), “Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 224-236.

  • 21. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The Knowledge-based Economy, Boca Raton, Universal Publishers.

  • 22. Mandel, R., Noyes, E. (2016), „Survey of experiential entrepreneurship education offering among top undergraduate entrepreneurship programs”, Education + Training, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 164-178.

  • 23. Mulej, M. (1979). Ustvarjalno delo in dialektična teorija sistemov (Creative Work and the Dialectical Systems Theory, in Slovenian), Celje, Razvojni center.

  • 24. Mulej, M. and 14 coauthors, (2013a). Dialectical Systems Thinking and the Law of Requisite Holism concerning Innovation, Litchfield Park, Arizona, Emergent Publications.

  • 25. Mulej, M., Dyck, M. (Eds.) (2014). Social responsibility beyond neoliberalism and charity, Shirjah, UAE, Bentham Science.

  • 26. Mulej, M., Hrast, A., Ženko, Z. (2013b), “Social Responsibility - measures and measurement”, Systems Practice and Action Research, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 475-484.

  • 27. Mulej, M., Merhar, V., Žakelj, V., Hrast, A., Čagran, B. (Eds.) (2016), Nehajte sovražiti svoje otroke in vnuke, 3 volumes, in Slovene, IRDO and Kulturni center Maribor.

  • 28. Mulej, M., Ženko, Z., Dyck, R., Ženko, Z. (Eds.) (2013d). Systemic practice and action research, New York, Plenum Press.

  • 29. Mulej, M., Ženko, Z., Potočan, V. (2009), "Odprto inoviranje" namesto "zaprtega inoviranja" = ’Open innovation’ replaces ’closed innovation’. Naše gospodarstvo, Vol. 55 No. 1-2, pp. 76-84.

  • 30. Peterman, E. N., Kennedy, J. (2003), „Entreprise Education: Influencing Students’ Perceptions of Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 129-144.

  • 31. Piketty, T. (2015). Kapital v 21. Stoletju (Original: Le capital au XXIe siẻcle, Slovene edition), Ljubljana, Mladinska knjiga.

  • 32. Potočan, V., Nedelko, Z. (2014), „Management innovativeness: A case of Slovenian small and medium enterprises”, Transformations in Business and Economics, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 41-59.

  • 33. Powell, W., Snellman, K. (2004), „The Knowledge Economy”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 30 No.1, pp. 199-220.

  • 34. Ralston, D., Egri, C., Furrer, O., Mockaitis, A. et al. (2014), „Societal-Level Versus Individual-Level Predictions of Ethical Behavior: A 48-Society Study of Collectivism and Individualism”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 122 No. 2, pp. 283-306.

  • 35. Ralston, D., Egri, C., Reynaud E., Srinivasan, N., et al. (2011), „A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values across the Global Workforce”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 104 No. 1, pp. 1-31.

  • 36. Rašič, K. (2015), “Sistem indikatorjev tehnično-tehnoloških raziskav, inovativnosti in znanja na primeru tranzicijskega gospodarstva”, PhD dissertation, Maribor, Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta.

  • 37. Smith, A. (1759, ed. 2000). The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Prometheus Books, New York.

  • 38. Smith, A. (1776, ed. 1998). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Modern Library, New York.

  • 39. Teece, D. (1998), „Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets”, California management review, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 55-79.

  • 40. Tidd, J., Bessant, J. (2009). Managing innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley and Sons.

  • 41. Wiener, N. (1985). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine, Cambridge, Mass, M.I.T. Press.

  • 42. Ženko, Z., Hrast, A., Mulej, M. (2013a), „Social responsibility: measures and measurement as a basis for organizational systemic action”, Systemic practice and action research, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 475-484.

  • 43. Ženko, Z., Mulej, M., Mulej, N., Hrast, A., (2013b), „Solving the economic crisis with (requisitely) holistic approach and (ethics of) interdependence”, Business Systems Review, ISSN 2280-3866, 2013, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 10-35.

  • 44. Zore, M. (2015), “Krepitev inovativnosti podjetij v Sloveniji z razvojem družbene odgovornosti”, PhD dissertation, Maribor, Univerza v Mariboru, Ekonomskoposlovna fakulteta.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search