Background: Companies can improve their business performance, increase revenues and reduce costs by enhancing their information technology (IT) capability. On the other side, there is an increasing importance of human resource management (HRM) practices related to IT utilization, which are important for the business performance of a company in the rapidly changing knowledge-based economy.
Objectives: The objective of this paper is to analyze the relations among IT capability, HRM capability and the firm’s performance outcomes.
Methods/Approach: The paper uses survey data and Structural Equation Modeling to analyze the relationships among IT capability, HRM capability and firms’ performance.
Results: This paper reveals that IT capability to some extent determines firms’ business performance but it plays more important role in enhancing HRM capability. In addition, HRM capability significantly impacts business performance.
Conclusions: The findings indicate that managers should not focus on allocating resources only for IT investments. In order to achieve better business performances, these technologies need to be used to support all business processes including HRM activities.
2. Barney, J.B. (1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99–121.
3. Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.
4. Bharadwaj, A. (2000), A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 169–196.
5. Broderick, R. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (1991), Human Resource Management, Information Technology, and the Competitive Edge, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
6. Carlsson, B. (2004), The digital economy: what is new and what is not?, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15: pp. 245–64.
7. Chae, H., Koh, C., & Prybutok, V. (2014), Information technology capability and firm performance: contradictory findings and their possible causes, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 305–326.
8. Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013), Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, Vol. 4 No. 4), pp. 976–997.
9. Chen, C. - J., Huang, J. - W., & Hsiao, Y. - C. (2010), Knowledge management and innovativeness: The role of organizational climate and structure, International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 848–870.
10. Chen, C. - J., & Huang, J. - W. (2009), Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance — The mediating role of knowledge management capacity, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 104–114.
11. Crawford, J., Leonard, L. N. K. & Jones, K. (2011), The human resource’s influence in shaping IT competence, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 111 No. 2, pp. 164-83.
12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
13. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006), Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.), Uppersaddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
14. Khandekar, A., & Sharma, A. (2005), Managing human resource capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical analysis from Indian global organisations. Education + Training, Vol. 47 No. 8/9, pp. 628–639.
15. Kmieciak, R., Michna, A., & Meczynska, A. (2012), Innovativeness, empowerment and IT capability: evidence from SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 112 No. 5, pp. 707–728.
16. Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (2012), Human Resource Management in the Knowledge Economy: New Challenges, New Roles, New Capabilities, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
17. Lin, C., & Hsu, M. - L. (2010), Holistic decision system for human resource capability identification. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 110 No.2, pp. 230–248.
18. Mäkelä, K., Björkman, I., Ehrnrooth, M., Smale, A., & Sumelius, J. (2013), Explaining stakeholder evaluations of HRM capabilities in MNC subsidiaries, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 44 No. 8), pp. 813–832.
19. Pérez-López, S. & Alegre, J. (2012), Information technology competency, knowledge processes and firm performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 112 No. 4, pp. 644–662.
20. Pérez-López, S., Montes Peon, J. M., & Vazquez Ordas, C. J. (2005), Human Resource Practices, Organizational Learning and Business Performance, Human Resource Development International, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 147 – 164.
21. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003), Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.88 No.5, pp.879–903.
22. Song, M., Nason, R. W., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2008), Distinctive Marketing and Information Technology Capabilities and Strategic Types: A Cross-National Investigation, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 4–38.
23. Steijn, B., & Van Den Muyzenberg, M. (2012). Human resource management in the information age. In I. Snellen, M. Thaens, & W. Donk (Eds.), Public administration in the information age: Revisited (pp. 252-263). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
24. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 509-33.
25. Tippins, M. J. & Sohi, R. S. (2003), IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 4 No. 8, pp. 745–761.