Background: Cryptocurrencies represent a specific technological innovation in financial markets that keeps getting more and more popular among investors around the world. Given the specific characteristics of the cryptocurrencies, this paper examines the possibility of their use as a diversification instrument.
Objectives: This paper examines the direction and strength of the relationship between the selected cryptocurrencies and important financial indicators on the European Union market. Since cryptocurrencies are a novelty in the financial system, the empirical literature in this area is rather scarce.
Methods/Approach: In order to assess diversification properties of cryptocurrencies for European traders, a comprehensive econometric analysis was carried out. The first part of the analysis refers to the estimation of the multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model, whereas the second part focuses on wavelet transforms.
Results: Bitcoin and Ripple proved as a possible diversification instrument on most of the observed European markets since corresponding coefficients of unconditional correlation are negative.
Conclusions: The relationship between the value of the cryptocurrencies and selected indices is generally very weak and slightly negative, indicating that some cryptocurrencies can serve as a means of diversification. However, investors need to take into account the extreme volatility, exhibited in all existing cryptocurrencies.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Arnerić J. (2007) “Ekonometrijsko modeliranje rizika na hrvatskom tržištu kapitala” (Econometric approach to risk modelling at Croatian capital market) Master’s Thesis Zagreb Faculty of Economics and Business.
2. Bauwens L. Laurent S. Rombouts J. V. K. (2006) “Multivariate GARCH models: A survey” Journal of Applied Econometrics Vol. 21 No. 1 pp. 79-109.
3. Bouri E. Jalkh N. Molnár P. Roubaud D. (2017a) “Bitcoin for energy commodities before and after the December 2013 crash: diversifier hedge or safe haven?” Applied Economics Vol. 49 No. 50 pp. 5063-5073.
4. Bouri E. Molnár P. Azzi G. Roubaud D. Hagfors L. I. (2017b) “On the hedge and safe haven properties of Bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier?” Finance Research Letters Vol. 20 pp. 192-198.
5. Bouri E. Gupta R. Tiwari A. K. Roubaud D. (2017c) “Does Bitcoin hedge global uncertainty? Evidence from Wavelet-based quantile-in-quantile regressions” Finance Research Letters Vol. 23 pp. 87-95.
6. Brière M. Oosterlinck K. Szafarz A. (2015) “Virtual currency tangible return: Portfolio diversification with Bitcoin” Journal of Asset Management Vol. 16 No. 6 pp. 365-373.
7. Cermak V. (2017) “Can Bitcoin Become a Viable Alternative to Fiat Currencies? An Empirical Analysis of Bitcoin's Volatility Based on a GARCH Model” available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2961405 (19 August 2018).
8. Chu J. Chan S. Nadarajah S. Osterrieder J. (2017) “GARCH Modelling of Cryptocurrencies” Journal of Risk and Financial Management Vol. 10 No. 4.
9. CNN Money Stock Market Data (N/A) available at: https://money.cnn.com/data/markets (18 August 2018).
10. Croatian Financial Services Supervisory Agency (N/A) “Capital market” available at: https://www.hanfa.hr/trziste-kapitala/ (20 August 2018).
11. Dhyrberg A. H. (2015) “Hedging Capabilities of Bitcoin. Is it the virtual gold?” available at: https://researchrepository.ucd.ie/handle/10197/7169 (19 August 2018).
12. Eisl A. Gasser S. M. Weinmayer K. (2015) “Caveat emptor: Does Bitcoin improve portfolio diversification?” available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2408997 (18 August 2018).
13. Engle R. F. (2002) “Dynamic Conditional Correlation: A Simple Class of Multivariate Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics Vol. 20 No. 3 pp. 339-350.
14. Engle R. F. Sheppard K. (2001) “Theoretical and Empirical properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH” NBER Working Paper 8554 National Bureau of Economic Research.
15. ESMA (2018) “ESMA EBA and EIOPA warn consumers on the risks of Virtual Currencies” available at: https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esas-warn-consumers-risks-in-buying-virtual-currencies (18 August 2018).
16. European Central Bank (2012) “Virtual Currency Schemes” available at: http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/virtualcurrencyschemes201210en.pdf (18 August 2018).
17. European Central Bank (2018) available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/html/index.en.html (20 August 2018).
18. European Commission (2018) available at https://ec.europa.eu/ (20 August 2018).
19. Hajba M. (2009) “Wavelet (valić) transformacija” (Wavelet Transform) Hrvatski matematički elektronički časopis (math.e) Vol. 28 available at: http://e.math.hr/vol28/Hajba (17 August 2018).
20. Halaburda H. Gandal N. (2016) “Competition in the Cryptocurrency Market” NET Institute Working Paper pp. 14-17.
21. Hayes A. (2015) “The Decision to Produce Altcoins: Miners' Arbitrage in Cryptocurrency Markets” The New School for Social Research Working Paper 04/2015.
22. Jurić M. (2014) “Analiza optimalnog portfelja odabranih dionica na hrvatskom tržištu kapitala GARCH modelom” (Analysis of the Optimal Portfolio of Selected Stocks on the Croatian Capital Market Using GARCH Model) Graduate Thesis Zagreb Faculty of Economics and Business.
23. Katsiampa P. (2017) “Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models” Economics Letters Vol. 158 pp. 3-6.
24. Kristoufek L. (2015) “What Are the Main Drivers of the Bitcoin Price? Evidence from Wavelet Coherence Analysis” PLoS ONE Vol. 10 No. 4.
25. Lim S. J. Masih M. (2017) “Exploring portfolio diversification opportunities in Islamic capital markets through bitcoin: evidence from MGARCH-DCC and Wavelet approaches” MPRA Paper 79752.
26. Madaleno M. Pinho C. (2012) “International stock market indices comovements: a new look” International Journal of Finance & Economics Vol. 17 No. 1 pp. 89-102.
27. Penrose K. L. (2014) “Banking on Bitcoin: Applying Anti-Money Laundering and Money Transmitter Laws” North Carolina Banking Institute Vol. 18 pp. 529-551.
28. Poyser O. (2017) “Exploring the determinants of Bitcoin's price: an application of Bayesian Structural Time Series” Ph.D. Thesis New York: Cornell University.
29. Rahim A. M. Masih M. (2016) “Portfolio diversification benefits of Islamic investors with their major trading partners: Evidence from Malaysia based on MGARCH-DCC and wavelet approaches” Economic Modelling Vol. 54 pp. 425-438.
30. Stavroyiannis S. Babalos V. (2017) “Dynamic properties of the Bitcoin and the US market” available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2966998 (20 August 2018).
31. Tillier M. (2015) “Accept That Bitcoin is a Currency and Stop Blaming the Victims of Crime” NASDAQ available at: http://www.nasdaq.com/article/accept-that-bitcoin-is-acurrency-and-stopblaming-the-victims-of-crime-cm442726 (21 August 2018).
32. Tse Y. K. Tsui A. K. C. (2002) “A Multivariate GARCH Model with Time-Varying Correlations” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Vol. 20 No. 3 pp. 351-362.
33. Urquhart A. (2017) “The volatility of Bitcoin” available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2921082 (20 August 2018).
34. Velde F. R. (2013) “Bitcoin: A primer” The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago available at: https://www.chicagofed.org/~/media/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2013/cfldecember2013-317-pdf.pdf (20 August 2018).