Background: In most countries, data on migration refer only to flows between administratively or statistically defined zones that are changing over time. When different numbers, sizes, and shapes of areas are chosen for analysis of internal migration, different results are generated. This problem is recognised as the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP).
Objectives: The paper analyses the impact of inter-municipal migration on population redistribution in Slovenia in 2000–2014 by considering the MAUP. Namely, the number of analysed municipalities increased by 19 in the considered period.
Methods/Approach: We analysed the MAUP effects and estimated internal migration statistics by producing a large number of aggregations using the IMAGE Studio software.
Results: Several statistics that measure the direction and pace of population concentration, as well as the correlation between measures of migration intensity and national development, have been calculated.
Conclusions: The results for Slovenia show that the migration efficiency decreases with the development process measured by the human development index.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Bell, M., Blake, M., Boyle, P., Duke-Williams, O., Rees, P., Stillwell, J., Hugo, G. (2002), “Cross-national comparison of internal migration: Issues and measures”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 165, No. 3, pp. 435-464.
2. Bell, M., Charles-Edwards, E., Kupiszewska, D., Kupiszewski, M., Stillwell, J., Zhu, Y. (2015), “Internal migration and development: Comparing migration intensities around the world”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 33-58.
3. Bernard, A., Bell, M., Charles-Edwards, E. (2014), “Improved measures for the cross-national comparison of age profiles of internal migration”, Population Studies, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 179-195.
4. Bernard, A., Rowe, F., Bell, M., Ueffing, P., Charles-Edwards, E. (2017), “Comparing internal Migration across the Countries of Latin America: A Multidimensional Approach”, PLOS ONE, Vol. 12, No.
7. Drobne, S., Rajar, T., Lisec, A. (2013), “Dynamics of migration and commuting to the urban centres of Slovenia, 2000-2011” (Dinamika selitev in delovne mobilnosti v urbana središča Slovenije, 2000-2011), Geodetski vestnik, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 313–353, available at: http://www.geodetski-vestnik.com/images/57/2/gv57-2_drobne_eng.pdf (15 December 2017).
9. Openshaw, S. (1984), The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem, Geo Books, Norwich, available at: http://qmrg.org.uk/catmog/ (15 August 2015).
10. Ravbar, M. (2005), “Urban sprawl: Popačena slika (sub)urbanizacije v Sloveniji?” (Urban sprawl: Skewed picture of (sub)urbanization in Slovenia?), Geografski vestnik, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 27-36.
11. Rees, P., Bell, M., Kupiszewski, M., Kupiszewska, D., Ueffing, P., Bernard, A., Charles-Edwards, E., Stillwell, J. (2016), “The impact of internal migration on population redistribution: an international comparison”, Population, Space and Place, Vol. 23, No. 6.
12. SMA (2017), “Spatial data on municipalities in Slovenia in 2000-2016”, The Surveying and Mapping Authority of the Republic of Slovenia, SMA.
16. Stillwell, J., Daras, K., Bell, M., Lomax, N. (2014), “The IMAGE Studio: A tool for internal migration analysis and modelling”, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 5-23.
17. Stillwell, J., Bell, M., Ueffing, P., Daras, K., Charles-Edwards, E., Kupiszewski, M., Kupiszewska, D. (2016), “Internal migration around the world: comparing distance travelled and its frictional effect”, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 1657-1675.