Determinants of Tax Morale in Croatia: an Ordered Logit Model

Open access

Abstract

Background: A lower tax morality leads to an increased readiness to become active in the unofficial economy and causes the lack of public revenues.

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to investigate determinants that shape tax morale of Croatian citizens.

Methods/Approach: An ordered logit model is employed to evaluate which determinants shape tax morale of Croatian citizens. Data for the research were collected from 2,000 face-to-face interviews conducted in Croatia in late 2015.

Results: The descriptive analysis illustrates that 52 percent of respondents reported a high level of tax morale, 26 percent of respondents have a low tax morale, while 8 and 14 percent have a mid-low and a mid-high tax morale, respectively. The ordered logit analysis revealed that gender, age, financial situation, region, and participation in the unofficial economy have an impact on the tax morale.

Conclusions: Besides socio-demographic, socio-economic, and spatial determinants, a great number of sanctions for participation in informal activities also shapes tax morale of the Croatian citizens. More precisely, marginal effects show that those perceiving the expected sanctions as “normal tax or social security contributions due, plus a fine or a prison sentence” have by 6.3 percentage points higher probability of reporting the highest tax morale than others.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Allingham M. G. Sandmo A. (1972) “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis” Journal of Public Economics Vol. 1 No. 3-4 pp. 323-338.

  • 2. Cameron A. C. Trivedi P. K. (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

  • 3. Chong A. Gradstein M. (2007) “Inequality and informality” Journal of Public Economics Vol. 91 No. 1-2 pp. 159-179.

  • 4. Daude C. Melguizo A. (2010) “Taxation and More representation? On Fiscal Policy Social Mobility and Democracy in latin America” OECD Development Centre Working Paper 294 OECD Paris.

  • 5. Franić J. Williams C. C. (2017) “Illegitimate Economic Practices in Croatia” GREY Working Paper No. 9 Sheffield University Management School University of Sheffield Institute of Public Finance Zagreb 2017.

  • 6. Hug S. Sporri F. (2011) “Referendums trust and tax evasion” European Journal of Political Economy Vol. 27 No. 1 pp. 120-131.

  • 7. Kogler C. Batrancea L. Nichita A. Pantya J. Belianin A. Kirchler E. (2013) “Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: Testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria Hungary Romania and Russia” Journal of Economic Psychology Vol. 34 pp. 169-180.

  • 8. Lago-Peñas I. Lago-Peñas S. (2010) “The determinants of tax morale in comparative perspective: Evidence from European countries” European Journal of Political Economy Vol. 26 No. 4 pp. 441-453.

  • 9. Luttmer E. F. P. Singhal M. (2014) “Tax Morale” Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 28 No. 4 pp. 149-168.

  • 10. Mallick D. (2009) “Marginal and Interaction Effects in Ordered Response Models” MPRA Paper No. 1332 Munich Personal RePEc Archive January 2009.

  • 11. Martínez-Vázquez J. Torgler B. (2009) “The evolution of tax morale in modern Spain” Journal of Economic Vol. 43 No. 1 pp. 1-28.

  • 12. Nerré B. (2008) “Tax Culture: A Basic Concept for Tax Politics” Economic Analysis and Policy Vol. 38 No. 1 pp. 153-167.

  • 13. Nerré B. Dragojlović A. Randjelović S. Djenić M. (2014) “Tax Reform in Serbia: experiences and perspectives” in proceedings of the Tax Reforms: Experiences and Perspectives Conference Institute of Public Finance Zagreb pp. 79-96.

  • 14. Nichita R. (2015) “Is tax literacy impacting on tax behavior?” Collaboration in complex system Bucharest: Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence Seaopenresearch available on http://seaopenresearch.eu/Proceedings/Article/NORD2_5.pdf (07 December 2018)

  • 15. OECD/FIIAPP (2015) Building Tax Culture Compliance and Citizenship: A Global Source Book on Taxpayer Education OECD Publishing Paris.

  • 16. Ristovska M. Mojsoska-Blaževski N. Nikolov M. (2013) “An alternative view to the tax evasion: The effect of tax morale on paying taxes in Macedonia and EU countries” Serbian Journal of Management Vol. 8 No.2 pp. 169-183.

  • 17. Royston P. (2004) “Multiple imputation of missing values” The Stata Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 pp. 227-241.

  • 18. Rubin D. B. (1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York.

  • 19. Schafer J. L. Graham J. (2002) “Missing data: our view of the state of the art” Psychological Methods Vol. 7 No. 2 pp. 147-177.

  • 20. Schneider F. (2011) Handbook on the Shadow Economy Edward Elgar Publishing Cheltenham.

  • 21. Schneider F. (2017) “Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economies of Highly-developed Countries: Selected New Results” CESifo DICE Report ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Vol. 14 No. 4 pp. 44-53.

  • 22. Tittle C. (1980) Sanctions and social deviance: The question of deterrence NY: Praeger New York.

  • 23. Torgler B. (2004) “Tax morale in Asian countries” Journal of Asian Economics Vol. 15 No. 2 pp. 237-266.

  • 24. Torgler B. (2005a) “Tax morale and direct democracy” European Journal of Political Economy Vol. 21 No. 2 pp. 525-531.

  • 25. Torgler B. (2005b) “Tax morale in Latin America” Public Choice Vol. 122 No. 1-2 pp. 133-157.

  • 26. Torgler B. Schaltegger C. A. (2005) “Tax Morale and Fiscal Policy” Working Paper No. 2005–30 Center for Research in Economics Management and the Arts.

  • 27. Torgler B. (2006) “The importance of faith: tax morale and religiousity” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Vol. 61 No. 1 pp. 81-109.

  • 28. Torgler B. Schneider F. (2007) “What shapes attitudes toward paying taxes? Evidence from multicultural European countries” Social Science Quarterly Vol. 88 No. 2 pp. 443-470.

  • 29. Torgler B. Schneider F. (2009) “The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy” Journal of Economic Psychology Vol. 30 No. 2 pp. 228-245.

  • 30. Torgler B. (2012) “Tax Morale Eastern Europe and European Enlargement” Communist and Post-Communist Studies Vol. 45 No. 1-2 pp. 11-25.

  • 31. Tsakumis G. T. Curatola A. P. Porcano T. M. (2007) “The relation between national cultural dimensions and tax evasion” Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation Vol. 16 No. 2 pp. 131-147.

  • 32. Wenzel M. (2005a) “Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention” Journal of Economic Psychology Vol. 26 No. 6 pp. 862-883.

  • 33. Wenzel M. (2005b) “Motivation or rationalisation? Causal relations between ethics norms and tax compliance” Journal of Economic Psychology Vol. 26 No. 4 pp. 491-508.

  • 34. Williams C. C. Franić J. Dzekova R. (2014) “Explaining the undeclared economy in Bulgaria: an institutional asymmetry perspective” The South East European Journal of Economics and Business Vol. 9 No. 2 pp. 33-45.

  • 35. Williams C. C. Franić J. (2015) “Tackling the Propensity towards Undeclared Work: Some Policy Lessons from Croatia” The South East European Journal of Economics and Business Vol. 10 No. 1 pp. 18-31.

  • 36. Williams C. C. Horodnic I.A. (2016a) “An institutional theory of the informal economy: some lessons from the United Kingdom” International Journal of Social Economics Vol. 43 No. 7 pp. 722-738.

  • 37. Williams C. C. Kayaoglu A. (2016b) “Tackling the Informal Economy in the European Union: A Social Actor Approach” UTMS Journal of Economics Vol. 7 No. 2 pp. 133-147.

  • 38. Williams C. C. Franić J. (2017) “Tackling the illegitimate under-reporting of salaries in Southeast Europe: some lessons from a 2015 survey in Bulgaria Croatia and FYR Macedonia” Eastern Journal of European Studies Vol. 8 No. 1 pp. 5-28.

  • 39. Williams C. C. Bezeredi S. (2018) “Explaining and tackling the informal economy: a dual informal labour market approach” Employee Relations Vol. 40 No. 5 pp. 889-902.

  • 40. Windebank J. Horodnic I. A. (2017) “Explaining participation in undeclared work in France: lessons for policy evaluation” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy Vol. 37 No. 3-4 pp. 203-217.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.57

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.165
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.388

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 54 54 30
PDF Downloads 47 47 29