During last year North Korea has made almost daily headline. Topics such as the strongest nuclear test, tests of missiles from medium range ballistic missiles (MRBM) to intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), readiness to retaliate to any possible U.S. attack, appeared frequently. In addition, the reaction of U.S. president D. Trump about American readiness to solve the issue, sending armada or reacting with fire and fury, were also covered by media all around the world. With these developments a possibility of nuclear war was discussed for the first time since the end of Cold War. This article aims to look closer to the reasons of North Korean behaviour, not only in last few years but within the contest of the concept of strategic culture. This concept has been used to explain behaviour of powers mainly, but the article aims to prove it is a viable tool to explain the motives and perceptions of any state in international system. The article aspires to conclude that the North Korean foreign and security policy is necessary to perceive in more complex picture. The current situation in North Korea is a result of combination of several factors that are determining and that have formed its perception of international relations
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Bernholz P. (2007) Ideology sects state and totalitarianism. In Maier H. & Schäfer M. Totalitarianism and Political Religions Volume II. Concepts for the comparison of dictatorship 246-271. London: Routledge.
Buzo A. (2003). Partyzánská dynastie. Politika a vedení Severní Koreje. Praha: BB Art
Cheon S. (2013). The Kim Jong-un Regime’s „Byungjin“ (Paralled Development) Policy of Economy and Nuclear Weapons and the ‘April 1st Nuclearization Law‘ Korean Institute for National Unification Online Series CO 13-11 available at: http://www.kinu.or.kr/pyxis-api/1/digital-files/b150d4ac-0f1b-420a-b70d-18f3e0aa9972.
Howlett D. (2005). Strategic culture: Reviewing recent literature. Strategic insights Vol. 4 No. 1 available at: http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/11212/howlettOct05.pdf?sequence=1.
Kim K. (2016). Analysis on the 7th congress of Korean Worker’s Party(1): General Review Korean Institute for National Unification Online Series CO 16-12 available at: http://www.kinu.or.kr/pyxis-api/1/digital-files/51df001d-b664-438d-8c5c-19db9d65bc30
Lankov A. (2007). North of the DMZ: Essays on Daily Life in North Korea. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.
Lantis J. S. (2002). Strategic culture and national security policy. International studies review Vol. 4 No. 3 87-113.
Lim J. (2009). Kim Jong Il’s Leadership of North Korea. New York: Routledge.
Martin B. K. (2004). Under the Loving Care of the Fatherly Leader. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.
Park H. (2010). Kim Jong Il the Military and the Party and Kim Jong Un. Korean Institute of National Unification available at: http://www.kinu.or.kr/www/jsp/prg/api/dlVE.jsp?menuIdx=645&category=7&thisPage=19&searchField=title&searchText=&biblioId=1447339.
Park H. (2013). One Year into the ‘6.28 Policy Directives‘ - Content and Progress Korean Institute for National Unification Online Series CO 13-18 available at: http://www.kinu.or.kr/eng/pub/pub_05_01.jsp?page=1&num=141&mode=view&field=&text=&order=&dir=&bid=EINGINSIGN&ses=&category=.
Schäfer M. (2004). Luigi Sturzo as a theorist of totalitarianism. In Maier H. Totalitarianism and Political Religions Volume I. Concepts for the comparison of dictatorship 21-39. London: Routledge.
Suh C. (2002). North Korea’s „Military First“ Policy and Inter-Korean Relations. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis Vol. XIV No. 2 167-185.
Snyder J. (1977). The Soviet strategic culture: Implications for limited nuclear operations. Santa Monica: Rand.