Planning Economic Contributions and Resource Allocation for Military Capability Development – The Case of Romania –

Vlad Ionuţ Dumitrache 1  and Florin Eduard Grosaru 1
  • 1 Dresmara,, Brasov, Romania


The Wales Summit in 2014 has meant a shift in paradigm in terms of defense expenditures for NATO member states. This was the case not just because of the general consensus that at least 2 % of the national GDP would be spent on defense, but also because another stipulation was that from that 2 %, at least 20 % would go on equipment acquisition and procurement. With new requirements on expenditures new strategies for defense planning have been implementing. Connecting contributions to capabilities through resource management is a new challenge for MoDs of NATO Members States. It is the aim of this paper to analyze how the Romanian national MoND has developed its own capabilities since 2014 and how the options for the years to come look in terms of defense spending, defense planning and resource allocation

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Buciu, L. (2018). George Friedman: Rusia este o superputere într-o nouă realitate, care nu este un nou război rece, available at:

  • NATO Parliamentary Assembly. (2018). Political Committee-Burden Sharing Revisited, Special Report, available at:

  • New Strategy Center. (2017). Vulnerabilities and Opportunities in the Black Sea region. Romanian perspective; Turkish perspective, available at:

  • Posirca, O. (2018). George Friedman, on Romania: “If you want to rely on political alliances, then you should think of sending politicians on the war’s frontline”, available at: .


Journal + Issues