Integrated mathematical model of competence-based learning-teaching process

Open access

Abstract

The competence-based learning-teaching process is a significant approach to the didactical process organization. In this paper the mathematical model of the competence-based learning-teaching process is proposed. The model integrates three models: a knowledge representation model (based on the ontological approach), a motivation model (as a behavioral-incentive model) and a servicing model (in a form of the queuing model). The proposed integrated model allows to control the learning-teaching process on different levels of management. The learning-teaching process can be interpreted as competence-based due to Open and Distance Learning (ODL) philosophy. We assume that the competence is a result of fundamental, procedural and project knowledge acquisition in accordance to the incoming European Qualification Framework.

References

  • [1] G. Hessami and M. Moore, “Manage competence not knowledge”, in Integrated Systems, Design and Technology, pp. 227-242, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2011.

  • [2] J. Sandberg, “Understanding of work: the basis for competence development”, in Int. Perspectives on Competence in the Workplace ed. C.R. Velde, pp. 57-85, Springer, Berlin, 2009.

  • [3] R. Sanchez, “Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five modes of competence”, J. Business Research 57 (5), 518-532 (2004).

  • [4] X. Boucher, E. Bonjour, and N. Matta, “Competence management in industrial processes. Editorial”, Computers in Industry 58 (1), 95-97 (2007).

  • [5] B. Chakroun, “National qualification frameworks: from policy borrowing to policy learning”, Eur. J. Education 45 (2), 199-216 (2010).

  • [6] P. Rożewski, B. Małachowski, and P. Dańczura, “Concept of competence management system for Polish National Qualification Framework in the Computer Science area”, Proc. Federated Conf. on Computer Science and Information Systems. FedCSIS 2013, 777-783 (2013).

  • [7] M.S.G. Harris, “Fulfilling a European vision through flexible learning and choice”, Eur. J. Education 47, 424-434 (2012).

  • [8] P. Rożewski, E. Kusztina, T. Tadeusiewicz, and O. Zaikin, “Intelligent open learning systems: concepts, models and algorithms”, Intelligent Systems Reference Library 22, CD-ROM (2011).

  • [9] R. Tadeusiewicz, “Selected problems resulting from the use of internet for teaching purposes”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 56 (4), 403-409 (2008).

  • [10] K. Umbleja, V. Kukk, and M. Jaanus, “Competence-based approach to learning”, Global Engineering Education Conf. (EDUCON) 1, 552-559 (2013).

  • [11] M. Hertlein and S. Smolnik, “How can knowledge management support competence-based learning? Towards a research agenda”, 45th Hawaii Int. Conf. on System Sciences 1, 3661-3668 (2012).

  • [12] A.V. S´anchez and M.P. Ruiz, Competence-based learning. A Proposal for the Assessment of Generic Competences, Universidad de Deusto, Deusto, 2008.

  • [13] P. Rożewski and M. Ciszczyk, “Model of a collaboration environment for knowledge management in competence-based learning”, 1st Int. Conf. on Computational Collective Intelligence. Semantic Web, Social Networks and Multiagent Systems (ICCCI) 9, 333-344 (2009).

  • [14] K. Enaleev, “Optimal incentive-compatible mechanisms in active systems”, Automation and Remote Control 74 (3), 491-505 (2013).

  • [15] D.A. Novikov and T.E. Shokhina, “Incentive mechanisms in dynamic active systems”, Automation and Remote Control 64 (12), 1912-1921 (2003).

  • [16] D.A. Novikov, “Incentives in teams under fuzzy uncertainty”, 12-th Int. Conf. on Systems Engineering 2, 171-175 (1997).

  • [17] J. Klamka, “Controllability of dynamical systems. A survey”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 61 (1), 335-342 (2013).

  • [18] P. Rożewski, “Model of intangible production network for competence development”, 5th Int. Conf. on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM) 2011, 246-256 (2011).

  • [19] P. Rożewski, “Concept of intangible production network system for competence development in open and distance learning”, Management and Production Engineering Review 2 (3), 52-62 (2011).

  • [20] E. Kusztina, O. Zaikin, and R. Tadeusiewicz, “The research behavior/ attitude support model in open learning systems”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 58 (4), 705-711 (2010).

  • [21] The European Qualification Framework website, http://ec.europa.eu/eqf, (access: 27.09.2013).

  • [22] Knowledge on Demand - project website, http://kod.iti.gr, (access: 27.09.2013).

  • [23] TenCompetence: Building the European network for lifelong competence development - project website, http://www.tencompetence.org, (access: 27.09.2013).

  • [24] TENCompetence Project, Frequently Asked Questions, http://tencompetence-project.bolton.ac.uk/node/123/index.html, (access: 27.09.2013).

  • [25] QUALITY: Quality Implementation in open and distance learning in a multicultural European environment - project website, http:// http://www15.uta.fi/projects/e-quality, (access: 27.09.2013).

  • [26] ADAM Leonardo da Vinci portal, thematic group EQF, http://www.adam-europe.eu/adam/, (access: 27.09.2013).

  • [27] ICOPER: Interoperable Content for Performance in Competency-driven Society - project website, http://icoper.org, (access: 27.09.2013).

  • [28] eCOTOOL: eCOmpetences TOOLs - project website, http://www.competencetools.eu/, (access: 27.09.2013).

  • [29] V. Tarasov, “Ontology-based approach to competence profile management”, J. Universal Computer Science 18 (20), 2893-2919 (2012).

  • [30] S. Colucci, E. Tinelli, E. Di Sciascio, and F.M. Donini, “Automating competence management through non-standard reasoning”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 24 (8), 1368-1384 (2011).

  • [31] F. Draganidis, P. Chamopoulou, and G. Mentzas, “A semantic web architecture for integrating competence management and learning paths”, J. Knowledge Management 12 (6), 121-136 (2008).

  • [32] M. Howard, “Mathematical learning theory through time”, J. Mathematical Psychology 59, 18-29 (2014).

  • [33] J. Keller, Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach, Springer, Berlin, 2010.

  • [34] E. Novak, “Toward a mathematical model of motivation, volition, and performance”, Computers & Education 74, 73-80 (2014).

  • [35] Y. Wang, “The theoretical framework and cognitive process of learning”, 6th IEEE Int. Conf. on Cognitive Informatics 1, 470-479 (2007).

  • [36] Y. Wang and Y. Wang, “Cognitive informatics models of the brain”, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 36 (2), 203-207 (2006).

  • [37] S. Grant and R. Young, “Concepts and standardization in areas relating to competence”, Int. J. IT Standards and Standardization Research 8 (2), 29-44 (2010).

  • [38] F. Draganidis and G. Mentzas, “Competency based management: a review of systems and approaches”, Information Management & Computer Security 14 (1), 51-64 (2006).

  • [39] V. Chiesa and R. Manzini, “Competence levels within firms: a static and dynamic analysis”, in Competence-based Strategic Management, pp. 195-214, ed. A. Heene, R. Sanchez, Wiley, London, 1997.

  • [40] HR-XML Consortium web site, http://www.hr-xml.org/, (access: 27.09.2013).

  • [41] P. Rożewski and B. Małachowski, “System for creative distance learning environment development based on competence management”, 14th Int. Conf. on Knowledge-based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES) 2010, 180-189 (2010).

  • [42] O. Zaikin, E. Kushtina, and P. Rożewski, “Model and algorithm of the conceptual scheme formation for knowledge domain in distance learning”, Eur. J. Operational Research 175 (3), 1379-1399 (2006).

  • [43] A. Poniszewska-Marańda, “Modeling and design of role engineering in development of access control for dynamic information systems” , Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 61 (3), 569-579 (2013).

  • [44] V. Kulba, S. Nikolsky, and O. Zaikin, “Ontological approach to modelling of discrete event dynamic system”, Bull. Pol. Ac.: Tech. 57 (3), 241-247 (2009).

  • [45] A. Gomez-Perez, M. Fernandez-Lopez, and O. Corcho, Ontological Engineering: with Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web, Springer, Berlin, 2004.

  • [46] E. Kushtina, P. Rożewski, and O. Zaikin, “Extended ontological model for distance learning purpose”, 6th Int. Conf. on Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management (PAKM) 2006, 155-165 (2006).

  • [47] R. McGreal, “A typology of learning object repositories”, in Handbook on Information Technologies for Education and Training, pp. 5-28, ed. H.H. Adelsberger Kinshuk, J.M. Pawlowski, and D. Sampson, Springer, Berlin, 2008.

  • [48] J.-P. Doignon and J.-C. Falmagne, Learning Spaces, Springer, Berlin, 2011.

  • [49] T. Ley, B. Kump, and D. Albert, “A methodology for eliciting, modelling, and evaluating expert knowledge for an adaptive work-integrated learning system”, Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 68 (4), 185-208 (2010).

  • [50] S. Brandt, D. Albert, and C. Hockemeyer, “Surmise relations between tests - mathematical considerations”, Discrete Applied Mathematics 127 (2), 221-239 (2003).

  • [51] H. Lihong, Q. Xiansheng, and H. Yanjun, “A capability assignment concept model for resource management system of product development”, IEEE Int. Symp. on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) 2007, 1927-1932 (2007).

  • [52] N. Noy and D. McGuinness, “Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology”, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05, CD-ROM (2001).

  • [53] P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat, “Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges”, IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering 25 (1), 158-176 (2013).

  • [54] V. Gonzalez-Barbone and L. Anido-Rifon, “Creating the first SCORM object”, Computers & Education 51 (4), 1634-1647 (2008).

  • [55] M. Shubik, “Game theory in the social sciences: concepts and solutions”, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1991.

  • [56] D.A. Novikov, A Theory of Control in Organizations, Sinteg, Moscow, 2012.

  • [57] M. Malinowska, “The reference model of information system for competence development monitoring”, Ph.D. Thesis, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, (2013), (in Polish).

  • [58] W. Sałabun, “The characteristic objects method: a new distance-based approach to multicriteria decision-making problems”, J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal., Doi: 10.1002/mcda.1525 (2014).

  • [59] E. Kusztina, O. Zaikin, P. Rożewski, and B. Małachowski, “Cost estimation algorithm and decision-making model for curriculum modification in educational organization”, Eur. J. Operational Research 197 (2), 752-763 (2009).

  • [60] O. Zaikin, Queuing Modelling of Supply Chain in Intelligent Production, Informa, Szczecin, 2002.

Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences

The Journal of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.156
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.238

CiteScore 2016: 1.50

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.457
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.239

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 18 18 18
PDF Downloads 5 5 5