How to define a diatom genus? Notes on the creation and recognition of taxa, and a call for revisionary studies of diatoms

Open access


We highlight the increase in the number of diatom genera being described, and suggest that their description be based on the concept of monophyly. That is, a new genus will contain the ancestor and all its descendants. Past criteria or guidance on how to circumscribe genera are reviewed and discussed, with conceptual and actual exemplars presented. While there is an increase in the rate of genus descriptions in diatoms, and there are many journal and series dedicated to facilitating this important activity, we call for revisionary works on diatom groups, to assess and establish monophyletic groups at all levels of hierarchy in the diatom system.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • AGARDH C. A. 1824: Systema Algarum. pp. [i]-xxxvii [1]-312. Lundae: Literis Berlingianis.

  • ALVERSON A. J. 2008: Molecular systematics and the diatom species. Protist 159 339-353.

  • BAKER R. H. GATESY J. 2002: Is morphology still relevant? In: DESALLE R GIRIBIT G. WHEELER W. (eds.) Molecular systematics and evolution: theory and practice163-174. Basel Birkhäuser.

  • CLEVE P. T. 1895: Synopsis of naviculoid diatoms. II. Kongliga Svenska-Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar 27 1-219.

  • COX E. J. 2010: Morphogenetic information and selection of taxonomic characters for raphid diatom systematics. Plant Ecology and Evolution 143 271-277.

  • COX J. D. 1890: The Coscinodiscaeae: notes on some unreliable criteria of genera and species. Proceedings of the American Society of Microscopists 4 184-204.

  • DE CLERCK O. GUIRY M. D. LELIAERT F. SAMYN Y. VERBRUGGEN H. 2013: Algal taxonomy: a road to nowhere? Journal of Phycology 49 215-225.

  • DONOGHUE M. J. 1985: A critique of the BSC and recommendations for a phylogenetic alter native. The Bryologist 83 172-181.

  • EDGAR S. M. THERIOT E. C. 2004: Phylogeny of Aulacoseira (Bacillariophyta) based on molecules and morphology. Journal of Phycology 40 772-788.

  • ESCHMEYER W. N. FRICKE R. FONG J. D. POLACK D. A. 2010: Marine fi sh diversity: history of knowledge and discovery (Pisces). Zootaxa 2525 19-50.

  • ESCHMEYER W. N. (ed.) 1998a: Catalog of fi shes. California Academy of Sciences. 3 Vols.

  • ESCHMEYER W. N. 1998b: Appendix A. Genera and species and the international code of zoological nomenclature. In: Catalog of fi shes 2847-2881. California Academy of Sciences.

  • ESCHMEYER W. N. (ed.) 2010: Catalog of fi shes on-line. California Academy of Sciences. Retrieved April 2014 from

  • FONTAINE B. VAN ACHTERBERG K. ALONSO-ZARAZAGA M. A. ARAUJO R. ASCHE M. et al. 2012: New species in the Old World: Europe as a frontier in biodiversity exploration a test bed for 21st century taxonomy. PLOS ONE 7(5): e36881. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.003688

  • FOURTANIER E. KOCIOLEK J. P. 1999: Catalogue of the diatom genera. Diatom Research 14 1-190.

  • FOURTANIER E. KOCIOLEK J. P. 2011: Catalogue of diatom names. Retrieved April 2014 from

  • HAAS O. SIMPSON G. G. 1946: Analysis of some phylogenetic terms with attempts at re definition. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 90 319-349.

  • HAMSHER S. E. GRAEFF C. L. STEPANEK J. G. KOCIOLEK J. P. (2014) Variation in valve and girdle band morphology in freshwater Denticula (Bacillariophyceae) species: Implications for the systematic position of the genus including the description of Tetralunata gen. nov. (Epithemiaceae Rhopalodiales). Festschrift for Pierre Compere (in press).

  • HENNIG W. 1953: Kritische Bemerkungen zur phylogenetischen Systematik. Beiträge zur Entomologie 3 1-85.

  • HUSTEDT F. 1927: Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. Kryptogamen Flora von Deutschland Österreich und der Schweiz. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.H. Leipzig 7 1-272.

  • HUSTEDT F. 1928: Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. Kryptogamen Flora von Deutschland Österreich und der Schweiz. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.H. Leipzig 7 273-464.

  • HUSTEDT F. 1930: Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In: PASCHER A. (ed.) Die Süsswasser-Flora Mitteleuropas. Heft 10. Gustav Fischer Jena.

  • HUXLEY J. S. 1959: Grades and clades. In: CAIN A. J. (ed.) Function and taxonomic importance 21-22. Systematics Association Publications.

  • JULIUS M. L. TANIMURA Y. 2001: Cladistic analysis of plicated Thalassiosira (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 40 111-122.

  • KARSTEN G. 1928: Abteilung Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In: ENGLER A. PRANTL K. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pfl anzenfamilien Peridineae (Dinofl agellatae) Diatomeae (Bacillariophyta) Myxomycetes 105-303 W. Engelmann Leipzig.

  • KERMARREC L. ECTOR L. BOUCHEZ A. RIMET F. HOFFMANN L. 2011: A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the Cymbellales based on 18S rDNA gene sequencing. Diatom Research 26 305-315.

  • KINGSTON J. C. 2003: Araphid and monoraphid Diatoms. In: WEHR J. D. SHEATH R. G. (eds.) Freshwater algae of North America. Ecology and classifi cation 595-636. Academic Press San Diego.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. 1997: Historical constraints species concepts and the search for a natural classifi cation of diatoms. Diatom 13 3-8.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. 1998: Does each genus of diatoms have at least one unique feature? - A reply to Round. Diatom Research 13 177-179.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. SPAULDING S. A. 2003a: Symmetrical naviculoid diatoms. In: WEHR J. D. SHEATH R. G. (eds.) Freshwater algae of North America. Ecology and classifi cation 637-653. Academic Press San Diego.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. SPAULDING S. A. 2003b: Eunotioid and asymmetrical naviculoid diatoms. In: WEHR J. D. SHEATH R. G. (eds.) Freshwater algae of North America. Ecology and classifi cation 655-668. Academic Press San Diego.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. STEPANEK J. G. LOWE R. L. JOHANSEN J. R. SHERWOOD A. R. 2013: Molecular data show enigmatic cave-dwelling diatom Diprora (Bacillariophyceae) to be a raphid diatom. European Journal of Phycology 48 474-484.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. STOERMER E. F. 1986: Phylogenetic relationships and classifi cation of monoraphid diatoms based on phenetic and cladistic methodologies. Phycologia 25 297-303.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. STOERMER E. F. 1988: A preliminary investigation of the phylogenetic relationships among the freshwater apical pore fi eld-bearing cymbelloid and gomphonemoid diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). Journal of Phycology 24 377-385.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. STOERMER E. F. 1989: Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the diatom genus Gomphoneis. Phycologia 28 438-454.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. STOERMER E. F. 1993: Freshwater gomphonemoid diatom phylogeny: Preliminary results. Hydrobiologia 269/270 31-38.

  • KOCIOLEK J. P. THERIOT E. C. WILLIAMS D. M. 1989: Inferring diatom phylogeny: A cladistic perspective. Diatom Research 4 289-300.

  • KULIKOVSKIY M. S. LANGE-BERTALOT H. METZELTIN D. WITKOWSKI A. 2012: Lake Baikal: hotspot of endemic diatoms. Iconographia Diatomologica 23 1-686.

  • KUSBER W.-H. JAHN R. 2003: Annotated list of diatom names by Horst Lange-Bertalot and co-workers. Retrieved June 2003 from

  • KÜTZING F. T. 1833: Synopsis Diatomacearum oder Versuch einer systematischen Zusammenstellung der Diatomeen. Linnaea 8 529-620.

  • LEVKOV Z. 2009: Amphora sensu lato. Diatoms of Europe 5. A. R. G. Gantner Verlag Ruggell.

  • LI Y. WILLIAMS D. M. METZELTIN D. KOCIOLEK J. P. 2010: Tibetiana pulchra gen. nov. et sp. nov. a new freshwater epilithic diatom from River Nujiang in Tibet China. Journal of Phycology 46 325-330.

  • LOWE R. L. 2003: Keeled and canalled Raphid Diatoms. In: WEHR J. D. SHEATH R. G. (eds.) Freshwater algae of North America. Ecology and classifi cation 669-684. Academic Press San Diego.

  • LUNDHOLM N. DAUGBJERG N. MOESTRUP Ø. 2002: Phylogeny of Bacillariaceae with emphasis on the genus Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) based on partial LSU rDNA. European Journal of Phycology 37 115-134.

  • MAIN S. P. 2003: Diprora haenaensis gen. et sp. nov. a fi lamentous pseudoaerial araphid diatom from Kaua’i (Hawaiian Islands). Diatom Research 18 259-272.

  • MANN D. G. EVANS K. M. 2007: Molecular genetics and the neglected art of diatomics. In: BRODIE J. LEWIS J. (eds.) Unravelling the algae; the past present and future of algal systematics 231-265. CRC Press Boca Raton Florida.

  • MANN D. G. STICKLE A. J. 1997: Sporadic evolution of dorsiventrality in raphid diatoms with special reference to Lyrella amphoroides sp. nov. Nova Hedwigia 65 59-78.

  • MCNEILL J. BARRIE F. R. BUCK W. R. DEMOULIN V. GREUTER W. HAWKWORTH D. L. HERENDEEN P. S. et al. 2012. International code of nomenclature for algae fungi and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne Australia July 2011. Koeltz Koenigstein Germany 232.

  • MERESCHKOWSKY C. 1902: On the classifi cation of diatoms. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 9 65-68.

  • MERESCHKOWSKY C. 1903a: Nouvelles recherches sur la structure et la division des Diatomées. (Rapport préliminaire). Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou ser. 2 17 149-172.

  • MERESCHKOWSKY C. 1903b: Les types de l’endochrome chez les diatomées. Botanicheskiya Zapiski. Izdaniya pri Botanicheskom Sade Imperatorskago S.-Peterburgskago Universiteta 21 1-106.

  • METZELTIN D. LANGE-BERTALOT H. 2007: Tropical diatoms of South America II. Species remarks on biogeography disjunction. Iconographia Diatomologica 18 1-877.

  • MISHLER B. D. BRANDON R. N. 1987: Individuality pluralism and the phylogenetic species concept. Biology and Philosophy 2 397-414.

  • MISHLER B. D. THERIOT E. C. 1997: Monophyly apomorphy and phylogenetic species concept. In: WHEELER Q. D. MEIER R. (eds.) Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: A debate 44-54. Columbia University Press New York.

  • MORA C. TITTENSOR D. P. ADL S. SIMPSON A. G. B. WORM B. 2011: How many species are there on Earth and in the Ocean? PLOS Biology 9(8): e1001127. doi:10.1371/journal. pbio.1001127

  • MORALES E. A. RIVERA S. F. WETZEL C. E. NOVAIS M. H. HAMILTON P. B. HOFFMANN L. ECTOR L. 2014: New epiphytic araphid diatoms in the genus Ulnaria (Bacillariophyta) from Lake Titicaca Bolivia. Diatom Research 29 41-54.

  • MÜLLER O. F. 1905: Bacillariaceen aus dem Nyassaland und einigen benachbarten Gebieten. III Folge Naviculoideae-Naviculeae-Gomphoneminae-Gomphocymbellinae-Cymbellinae. Nitzschioideae-Nitzschieae. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik Pfl anzengeschichte und Pfl anzengeographie. Leipzig 36 137-206

  • PATRICK R. M. REIMER C. W. 1966: The Diatoms of the United States. Vol. 1. Monograph 13 Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.

  • PETIT P. 1877: An essay on the classifi cation of the Diatomaceae (with descriptions of some new species). Monthly Microscopical Journal London 18 10-14.

  • PFITZER E. 1871: Untersuchungen über Bau and Entwickelung der Bacillariaceen (Diatomaceen). Botanische Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiet der Morphologie und Physiologie 2 1-189.

  • RIMET F. KERMARREC L. BOUCHEZ A. HOFFMANN L. ECTOR L. MEDLIN L. K. 2011: Mole cular phylogeny of the family Bacillariaceae based on 18S rDNA sequences: focus on freshwater Nitzschia of the section Lanceolatae. Diatom Research 26 273-291.

  • ROSS R. 1995: A revision of Rutilaria Greville (Bacillariophyta). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum of London Botany 25 1-93.

  • ROUND F. E. 1996: What characters defi ne diatom genera species and infraspecifi c taxa. Diatom Research 11 203-218.

  • ROUND F. E. 1997a: Genera species and varieties - are problems real or imagined? Diatom 13 25-29.

  • ROUND F. E. 1997b: Does each diatom genus have a unique feature? Diatom Research 12 341-345.

  • ROUND F. E. CRAWFORD R. M. MANN D. G. 1990: The Diatoms: Biology & morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

  • RUCK E. KOCIOLEK J. P. 2004: A preliminary phylogeny of the family Surirellaceae. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 50 1-236.

  • RUCK E. C. THERIOT E. C. 2011: Origin and evolution of the canal raphe system in diatoms. Protist 162 723-737.

  • SCHMITT M. 2013: From taxonomy to phylogenetics - life and work of Willi Hennig. Brill Leiden The Netherlands.

  • SCHOEMAN F. R. ARCHIBALD R. E. M. 1986: Observations on Amphora species (Bacillariophyceae) in the British Museum (Natural History) V. Some species from the subgenus Amphora. Journal of South African Botany 52 425-437.

  • SCHÜTT F. 1896: Bacillariales (Diatomeae). In: ENGLER A. PRANTL K. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pfl anzenfamilien 31-150. W. Engelmann Leipzig.

  • SIMS P. A. MANN D. G. MEDLIN L. K. 2006: Evolution of the diatoms: insights from fossil biological and molecular data. Phycologia 45 361-402.

  • STEPANEK J. KOCIOLEK J. P. 2014: Molecular phylogeny of Amphora sensu stricto (Bacillariophyta): an investigation into the monophyly and classifi cation of the amphoroid diatoms. Protist 165 177-195.

  • STOERMER E. F. JULIUS M. L. 2003: Centric Diatoms. In: WEHR J. D. SHEATH R. G. (eds.) Freshwater algae of North America. Ecology and classifi cation 559-594. Academic Press San Diego.

  • THESSEN A. E. PATTERSON D. J. MURRAY S. A. 2012: The taxonomic signifi cance of species that have only been observed once: The genus Gymnodinium (Dinofl agellata) as an example. PLOS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044015

  • VAN HEURCK H. 1896: A treatise on the Diatomaceae. W. Wesley & Son London.

  • VAN DE VIJVER B. COCQUYT C. 2009: Four new diatom species from La Calera hot spring in the Peruvian Andes (Colca Canyon). Diatom Research 24 209-223.

  • VYVERMAN W. SABBE K. MANN D. G. VYVERMAN R. VANHOUTTE K. HODGSON D. 1998: Eunophora gen. nov. (Bacillariophyta) from Tasmania and New Zealand: description and comparison with Eunotia and amphoroid diatoms. European Journal of Phycology 33 95-111.

  • WILLIAMS D. M. 1985: Morphology taxonomy and interrelationships of the ribbed araphid dia toms from the genera Diatoma and Meridion (Diatomaceae: Bacillariophyta). Bibliotheca Diatomologica 8 5-228. WILLIAMS D. M. 1990: Cladistic analysis of some freshwater araphid diatoms (Bacillariophyta) with particular reference to Diatoma and Meridion. Plant Systematics and Evolution 171 89-97.

  • WILLIAMS D. M. 2009: ‘Araphid’ diatom classifi cation and the ‘absolute standard’. Acta Botanica Croatia 68 445-463.

  • WILLIAMS D. M. 2013: Why is Synedra berolinensis so hard to classify? More on monotypic taxa. Phytotaxa 127 113-127.

  • WILLIAMS D. M. KOCIOLEK J. P. 2011: An overview of diatom classifi cation with some prospects for the future In: SECKBACH J. KOCIOLEK J. P. (eds.) The Diatom world 47-91. Dordrecht The Netherlands Springer.

  • WITKOWSKI A. NEVROVA E. LANGE-BERTALOT H. KOCIOLEK J. P. 2014: Navicula petrovii sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae) a naviculoid diatom with amphoroid symmetry and its relationship to Navicula sensu stricto and other naviculoid genera. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 143 469-484.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.985
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.006

CiteScore 2018: 1.18

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.360
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.995

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 429 303 11
PDF Downloads 130 90 8