The geography of openness to foreign trade in Poland: The role of special economic zones and foreign-owned entities

Open access

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the spatial distribution of openness to foreign trade assessed at the local level (LAU 1, poviats) in Poland, between 2005 and 2012, with particular reference to its two determinants: activity of foreign-owned enterprises (FOEs) and functioning of special economic zones (SEZs). With the use of data from different sources, including the foreign trade statistics for the Polish regions, constituting a set of indicators on openness to foreign trade, we deliberate on the determinants and the character of regional openness, as well as the quality of the proxies used in order to assess their spatial distribution. Our results indicate high regional dissimilarities in terms of export activity, correlated with the broader picture of regional inequalities. The role of FOEs has been crucial in determining the spatial distribution of exports. As regards the SEZs, their sole contribution increased significantly during the time span. In the times of the world financial crisis, the export performance diversity of poviats increased temporarily but diminished afterwards.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arezki R. and van der Ploeg F. (2010). Trade policies institutions and the natural resource curse. Applied Economics Letters 17(15) 1443–1451. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504850903035881.

  • Bagchi-Sen S. (1999). The Small and Medium Sized Exporters’ Problems. An Empirical Analysis of Canadian Manufacturers. Regional Studies 33(3) 231–245. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409950082427.

  • Baldwin J.R. and Brown W.M. (2004). Regional manufacturing employment volatility in Canada. The effects of specialisation and trade. Papers in Regional Science 83(3) 519–541. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.2004.tb01923.x.

  • Batabyal AA. and Nijkamp P. editors (2015). The region and trade. New analytical directions. Singapore Hackensack London: World Scientific.

  • Boschma R. Minondo A. and Navarro M. (2011). Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science 38 91 2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00387.x.

  • Brodzicki T. (2014). Płytkie i głębokie determinanty rozwojowe polskich regionów (Shallow and deep growth determinants of Polish regions – in Polish). Wrażliwość polskich regionów na wyzwania współczesnej gospodarki. Implikacje dla polityki rozwoju regionalnego (The sensitivity of Polish regions to global economy’s challenges. Implications for regional policy) Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer business 114–140.

  • Brülhart M. (2011). The spatial effects of trade openness. A survey. Review of World Economics 147(1) 59–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10290-010-0083-5.

  • Buch C.M. and Monti P. (2010). Openness and income disparities. Does trade explain the “Mezzogiorno effect”? Review of World Economics 145(4) 667–688. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10290-009-0038-x.

  • Cieślik E. Biegańska J. and Środa-Murawska S. (2016a). Evaluation of Trends in Foreign Trade Development in the Post-Communist Countries of Europe in the Years 2000–2012 Following their Accession to the EU. Quaestiones Geographicae. 35(4) 35-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0033.

  • Cieślik E. Biegańska J. and Środa-Murawska S. (2016b). The intensification of foreign trade in post-socialist countries and their role in global value chains. Acta Oeconomica 66(3) 465–487. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/032.2016.66.3.5.

  • Ciołek D. (2014). Zdolność do przyciągania kapitału zagranicznego. Atrakcyjność inwestycyjna województw (FDI attraction: investment attractiveness – in Polish). Wrażliwość polskich regionów na wyzwania współczesnej gospodarki. Implikacje dla polityki rozwoju regionalnego (The sensitivity of Polish regions to global economy’s challenges. Implications for regional policy) Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer business 171–186.

  • Coşar A.K. and Fajgelbaum P.D. (2016). Internal Geography International Trade and Regional Specialization. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 8(1) 24–56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/mic.20140145.

  • Coulombe S. (2007). Globalization and Regional Disparity. A Canadian Case Study. Regional Studies 41(1) 1–17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400601099698.

  • Courant P.N. and Deardorff A.V. (1992). International Trade with Lumpy Countries. Journal of Political Economy 100(1) 198–210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261813.

  • Csomós G. (2017). Cities as command and control centres of the world economy: An empirical analysis 2006–2015. Bulletin of Geography. Socio–economic Series 38 7–26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2017-0031.

  • Daumal M. (2013). The Impact of Trade Openness on Regional Inequality. The Cases of India and Brazil. The International Trade Journal 27(3) 243–280. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2013.796839.

  • Dufort J. and Murray F. (2005) Impact of the exchange rate appreciation on Québec export and GDP growth: study. Québec: Ministere du Developpement economiqu et regional et de la recherché.

  • Edgington D.W. and Hayter R. (1997). International Trade Production Chains and Corporate Stategies. Japan’s Timber Trade with British Columbia. Regional Studies 31(2) 151–166. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343409750133279.

  • Epanechnikov V.A. (1969). Non-Parametric Estimation of a Multivariate Probability Density. Theory of Probability & Its Applications 14(1) 153–158. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1114019.

  • Erickson R.A. (1989). Export Performance and State Industrial Growth. Economic Geography 65(4) 280-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/143407.

  • Ezcurra R. and Rodríguez-Pose A. (2014). Trade Openness and Spatial Inequality in Emerging Countries. Spatial Economic Analysis 9(2) 162–182. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2014.891155.

  • Farole T. (2013). Trade Location and Growth. The internal geography of trade. Lagging regions and global markets Washington DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development The World Bank 15–31.

  • Gawlikowska-Hueckel K. and Umiński S. (2013). Competitiveness at the Regional Level: Export Oriented Approach for Poland. In Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence Integration and Security Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe 11(9) 131–156.

  • Gawlikowska-Hueckel K. and Umiński S. (2016). Analysis of the Polish foreign trade in the light of recent theoretical concepts. Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.

  • González Rivas M. (2007). The effects of trade openness on regional inequality in Mexico. The Annals of Regional Science 41(3) 545–561. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0099-x.

  • James R. and Scott Cato M. (2014). From Resilient Regions to Bioregions: An Exploration of Green Post-Keynesianism. Leeds: Post Keynesian Economics Study Group (PKSG) (Working Paper no. 1407).

  • Komornicki T. Zaucha J. Szejgiec B. and Wiśniewski R. (2015). Powiązania eksportowe gospodarki lokalnej w warunkach zmiennej koniunktury. Analiza przestrzenna (Export linkages of local economy in the changing economic situation. Spatial analysis – in Polish) Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania PAN im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego. Available online at https://books.google.pl/books?id=-vXJDAAAQBAJ (DoA: 01.09.2016).

  • Komornicki T. and Szejgiec B. (2015). Spatial diversity of Polish export linkages. Geographia Polonica 88(1) 173–178. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0011.

  • Lee J. (2011). Export specialization and economic growth around the world. Economic Systems 35(1) 45–63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2010.11.002.

  • Llop M. and Manresa A. (2007). Analysis of Linear Multipliers in an Open Regional Economy. Regional Studies 41(4) 421–428. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343400701281824.

  • Maćkowiak H. (2011). The Goods Structure of Trade between Polish Regions and the European Union. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 16 57–74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10089-011-0014-9.

  • Martin R. (2011). Regional economic resilience hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography 12(1) 1–32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr019.

  • Masik G. and Rzyski S. (2014). Resilience of Pomorskie region to economic crisis. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 25 129–14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bog-2014-0034.

  • Melitz M.J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica 71(6) 1695–1725. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467.

  • Nazarczuk J.M. (2017). Do operations in SEZs improve a firm’s productivity? Evidence from Poland. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences 4(10) 256-264. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v4i10.3096.

  • Nazarczuk J.M. Uminski S. and Brodzicki T. (2017).Local determinants of the spatial distribution of exporters in Poland. The role of FDI. Sopot: Institute for Development (Working Papers 001/2017).

  • Nazarczuk J.M. (2015). Regional distance. The concept and empirical evidence from Poland. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 28 129–141. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bog-2015-0020.

  • OECD (2010). Regional Development Policies in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • Pernia E.M. and Quising P.F. (2005). Trade openness and regional development in a developing country. Globalization and Urban Development Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (Advances in Spatial Science) 79–94.

  • Polese M. and Shearmur R. (2006). Why some regions will decline. A Canadian case study with thoughts on local development strategies. Papers in Regional Science 85(1) 23–46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00024.x.

  • Rodrik D. (2003). Institutions integration and geography. In search of the deep determinants of economic growth. Rodrick D. editor In Search for Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth Princeton: Princeton University Press 1-22.

  • Rosik P. Stępniak M. and Komornicki T. (2015). The decade of the big push to roads in Poland. Impact on improvement in accessibility and territorial cohesion from a policy perspective. Transport Policy 37 134–146. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.007.

  • Scott A. and Storper M. (2010). Regions Globalization Development. Regional Studies 37(6-7) 579–593. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108697a.

  • Soukiazis E. and Antunes M. (2011). Is foreign trade important for regional growth? Empirical evidence from Portugal. Economic Modelling 28(3) 1363–1373. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.02.023.

  • Tobolska A. (2013). Structure of foreign investment in the industry of Poland at the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 22 111–125. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bog-2013-0035.

  • Trosset M. W. (2009). An introduction to statistical inference and its applications with R. London: CRC Press.

  • Turner B.L. Kasperson R.E. Matson P.A. McCarthy J.J. Corell R.W. Christensen L. Eckleyg N. Kasperson J.X. Luerse A. Martellog M.L. Polsky C. Pulsiphera A. Schillerb A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(14) 8074–8079. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231335100.

  • Umiński S. (2012). Rozważania nad naturą przyczynami oraz konkurencyjnością działalności eksportowej w ujęciu regionalnym dla Polski (Considerations on the nature causes and competitiveness of export activity in a regional perspective for Poland – in Polish). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.

  • Umiński S. (2014). Integration of Poland’s regions with the European Union - Assesment of Intra Industry Trade Relations. European Integration Studies 8 93-98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.8.6770.

  • Umiński S. (2016). The regionalisation of commercial policy and of export-related analyses. Analysis of the Polish foreign trade in the light of recent theoretical concepts Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House 212–232.

  • Zaucha J. Ciołek D. Brodzicki T. and Głazek E. (2014). Wrażliwość polskich regionów na wyzwania gospodarki globalnej (The sensitivity of Polish regions to global economy challenges - in Polish). Wrażliwość polskich regionów na wyzwania współczesnej gospodarki. Implikacje dla polityki rozwoju regionalnego (The sensitivity of Polish regions to global economy’s challenges. Implications for regional policy) Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer business 206–244.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 1.11

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.218
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.591

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 465 250 14
PDF Downloads 288 189 4