Innovation and Regional Socio-Economic Development - Evidence from the Finnish Local Administrative Units (1)

Teemu Makkonen 1
  • 1 University Of Helsinki, Finland

Innovation and Regional Socio-Economic Development - Evidence from the Finnish Local Administrative Units (1)

It is often argued that innovation plays a key role in the economic growth of regions. Therefore, the impacts of innovation on the socio-economic development of regions have been widely discussed in previous studies, but with divergent areal coverage, methods, and datasets. As a point for departure, these relationships redrawn from international literature are tested here with a single dataset from Finnish local administrative units and with coherent methods. As there does not seem to be a generally accepted indicator for innovation which can claim to be superior, despite the growing literature on the subject, research and development (R&D), and patent statistics are used in this paper to represent innovation activity. The significant, strong, and positive relationship between innovation and traditional socio-economic variables is verified using Finnish regions.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Acs, Z. and Varga, A. 2002: Geography, endogenous growth and innovation. In: International Regional Science Review, 25, pp. 132-148. DOI: 10.1177/016001702762039484

  • Acs, Z., Anselin, L. and Varga, A. 2002: Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. In: Research Policy, 31, pp. 1069-1085. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333 (01)00184-6

  • Ahuja, G. and Katila, R. 2001: Technological acquisition and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. In: Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp. 197-220. DOI: 10.1002/smj.157

  • Antikainen, J. and Vartiainen, P. 2005: Polycentricity in Finland: from structure to strategy. In: Built Environment, 31, pp. 143-152. DOI: 10.2148/benv.31.2.143.66257

  • Arundel, A. 2001: The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. In: Research Policy, 30, pp. 611-624. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333 (00)00100-1

  • Arundel, A. and Kabla, I. 1998: What percentage of innovations are patented: empirical estimates for European firms. In: Research Policy, 27, pp. 127-141. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333 (98)00033-X

  • Bairoch, P. 1988: Cities and Economic Development: from the Dawn of History to the Present, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Barkley, D., Henry, M. and Nair, S. 2006: Regional innovation systems: implications for nonmetropolitan areas and workers in the south. In: Growth and Change, 37, pp. 278-306. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00318.x

  • Bettencourt, L., Lobo, J. and Strumsky, D. 2007: Invention in the city: increasing returns of patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. In: Research Policy, 36, pp. 107-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.026

  • Bilbao-Osorio, B. and Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2004: From R&D to innovation and economic growth in the EU. In: Growth and Change, 35, pp. 434-455. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00256.x

  • Bramwell, A. and Wolfe, D. 2008: Universities and regional economic development: the entrepreneurial university of Waterloo. In: Research Policy, 37, pp. 1175-1187. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.016

  • Brouwer, E. and Kleinknecht, A. 1999: Innovative output and a firm's propensity to patent: an exploration of CIS micro data. In: Research Policy, 28, pp. 615-624. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333 (99)00003-7

  • Brouwer, E., Budil-Nadvornikova, H. and Kleinknecht, A. 1999: Are urban agglomerations a better breeding place for product innovation: an analysis of new product announcements. In: Regional Studies, 33, pp. 541-549. DOI: 10.1080/00343409950078233

  • Cabrer-Borrás, B. and Serrano-Domingo, G. 2007: Innovation and R&D spillover effects in Spanish regions: a spatial approach. In: Research Policy, 36, pp. 1357-1371. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.04.012

  • Ceh, B. 2001: Regional innovation potentials in the United States: evidence of spatial transformation. In: Papers in Regional Science, 80, pp. 297-316. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.2001.tb01801.x

  • Chen, P. and Popovich, P. 2002: Correlation: Parametric and Nonparametric Measures, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  • Co, C. 2002: Evolution of the geography of innovation: evidence from patent data. In: Growth and Change, 33, pp. 393-423. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2257.00204

  • Coad, A. and Rao, R. 2008: Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: a quantile regression approach. In: Research Policy, 37, pp. 633-648. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.003

  • Crosby, M. 2000: Patents, innovation and growth. In: The Economic Record, 76, pp. 255-262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2000.tb00021.x

  • Czarnitzki, D. and Hottenrott, H. 2009: Are local milieus the key to innovation performance. In: Journal of Regional Science, 49, pp. 81-112. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2008.00584.x

  • Damanpour, F. 1991: Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. In: Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp. 555-590. DOI: 10.2307/256406

  • De Noronha Vaz, M.T., Cesário, M. and Fernandes, S. 2006: Interaction between innovation in small firms and their environments: an explanatory study. In: European Planning Studies, 14, pp. 96-117. DOI: 10.1080/09654310500339893

  • Ebersberger, B. 2005: The Impact of Public R&D Funding, Espoo: VTT.

  • Evangelista, R., Iammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V. and Silvani, A. 2001: Measuring the regional dimension of innovation: lessons from the Italian innovation survey. In: Technovation, 21, pp. 733-745. DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972 (00)00084-5

  • Ewers, M. 2007: Migrants, markets and multinationals: competition among world cities for the highly skilled. In: GeoJournal, 68, pp. 119-130. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-007-9077-9

  • Fagerberg, J. 2005: Innovation: a guide to the literature. In: Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. and Nelson, R. editors, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-26. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001

  • Faggian, A. and McCann, P. 2009: Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British regions. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, pp. 317-333. DOI: 10.1093/cje/ben042

  • Florida, R. 2005: Cities and the Creative Class, New York: Routledge.

  • Florida, R., Mellander, C. and Stolarick, K. 2008: Inside the black box of regional development - human capital, the creative class and tolerance. In: Journal of Economic Geography, 8, pp. 615-649. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbn023

  • Goldstein, H. and Renault, C. 2004: Contribution of universities to regional economic development: a quasi-experimental approach. In: Regional Studies, 38, pp. 733-746. DOI: 10.1080/0034340042000265232

  • Gössling, T. and Rutten, R. 2007: Innovation in regions. In: European Planning Studies, 15, pp. 253-270. DOI: 10.1080/09654310601078788

  • Gu, W. and Tang, J. 2004: Link between innovation and productivity in Canadian manufacturing industries. In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13, pp. 671-686. DOI: 10.1080/1043890410001686806

  • Hagedoorn, J. and Cloodt, M. 2003: Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators. In: Research Policy, 32, pp. 1365-1379. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333 (02)00137-3

  • Hanel, P. 2008: The use of intellectual property rights and innovation by manufacturing firms in Canada. In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17, pp. 285-309. DOI: 10.1080/10438590701581481

  • Hasan, I. and Tucci, C. 2010: The innovation-economic growth nexus: global evidence. In: Research Policy, 39, pp. 1264-1276. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.005

  • Hipp, C. and Grupp, H. 2005: Innovation in the service sector: the demand for servicespecific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. In: Research Policy, 34, pp. 517-535. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.002

  • Jauhiainen, J. 2008: Regional and innovation policies in Finland - towards convergence and/or mismatch. In: Regional Studies, 42, pp. 1031-1045. DOI: 10.1080/00343400701543140

  • Kleinknecht, A., van Montford, K. and Brouwer, E. 2002: The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11, pp. 109-121. DOI: 10.1080/10438590210899

  • Mikkonen, K. 2002: The competitive advantage of regions and small economic areas: the case of Finland. In: Fennia, 180, pp. 191-198.

  • Mitchell, G. 1999: Global technology policies for economic growth. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60, pp. 205-214. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-1625 (98)00044-4

  • Molina-Morales, F.X. and Mas-Verdu, F. 2008: Intended ties with local institutions as factors in innovation: an application to Spanish manufacturing firms. In: European Planning Studies, 16, pp. 811-827. DOI: 10.1080/09654310802079452

  • Myrdal, G. 1969: Ekonomisk Teori och Underutvecklade Regioner, Stockholm: Tidens Förlag.

  • Piekkola, H. 2006: Knowledge and Innovation Subsidies as Engines for Growth - The Competitiveness of Finnish Regions, Helsinki: ETLA.

  • Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Tomaney, J. 2007: What kind of local and regional development and for whom. In: Regional Studies, 41, pp. 1253-1269. DOI: 10.1080/00343400701543355

  • Porter, M. 2003: The economic performance of regions. In: Regional Studies, 37, pp. 549-578. DOI: 10.1080/0034340032000108688

  • Rantala, O. 2001: Regional economic development in Finland in the 1990s and the outlook to 2005. In: The Finnish Economy and Society, 2001, 2, pp. 64-70.

  • Ratanawaraha, A. and Polenske, K. 2007: Measuring geography of innovation: a literature review. In: Polenske, K. editor, The Economic Geography of Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30-59.

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. 1999: Innovation prone and innovation averse societies: economic performance in Europe. In: Growth and Change, 30, pp. 75-105. DOI: 10.1111/0017-4815.00105

  • Siirilä, S., Hautamäki, L., Kuittinen, J. and Keski-Petäjä, T. 1990: Regional wellbeing variations in Finland. In: Fennia, 168, pp. 179-200.

  • Siirilä, S., Vaattovaara, M. and Viljanen, V. 2002: Well-being in Finland: a comparison of municipalities and residential differentiation in two cities. In: Fennia, 180, pp. 141-149.

  • Simmie, J., Sennett, J., Wood, P. and Hart, D. 2002: Innovation in Europe: a tale of networks, knowledge and trade in five cities. In: Regional Studies, 36, pp. 47-64. DOI: 10.1080/00343400120099852

  • Sterlacchini, A. 2008: R&D, higher education and regional growth: uneven linkages among European regions. In: Research Policy, 37, pp. 1096-1107. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.009

  • Sternberg, R. and Arndt, O. 2001: The firm or the region: what determines the innovation behaviour of European firms. In: Economic Geography, 77, pp. 364-382. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2001.tb00170.x

  • Szajnowska-Wysocka, A. 2009: Theories of regional and local development - abridged review. In: Szymańska, D. and Domin, D.J. editors, Bulletin of Geography Socioeconomic Series, 12, Toruń: Nicolaus Copernicus University Press, pp. 75-90. DOI: 10.2478/v10089-009-0005-2

  • Tang, J. 2006: Competition and innovation behaviour. In: Research Policy, 35, pp. 68-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.004

  • Thornhill, S. 2006: Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and lowtechnology regimes. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 21, pp. 687-703. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.06.001

  • Tödtling, F., Lehner, P. and Trippl, M. 2006: Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: the nature and geography of knowledge links. In: European Planning Studies, 14, pp. 1035-1058. DOI: 10.1080/09654310600852365

  • Van Reenen, J. 1997: Employment and technological innovation: evidence from U.K. manufacturing firms. In: Journal of Labor Economics, 15, pp. 255-284.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search