Eco-Economics in Cities and Rural Areas

Open access


Economic models are built primarily following the classical economic theories, but a challenge to build good models with classical theories is needed to define the exact value of the Earth, which is hardly definable. Quite often national gross product indicator calculation reuses the same performance indicators, where the resource and income distribution system is not linked to production factors. The resource and income distribution system is primarily associated with low productivity (execution of a sales plan, execution of a profit plan, profitability level, increase in market share, personnel turnover rate, hours worked per employee). Changes in the productive and economic structures of the markets result in new innovative growth patterns which, based on customer motivation, are linked to the concentration of capital in regional and national markets, the growth of transnational markets and the development of technology. At the same time, extensive economic development through natural resources leads to deforestation, landscape changes, desertification, swamping and soil fertility renewal. So far, it often has been assumed that economic growth depends on the use of natural resources, and natural resources are unlimited. The results are “resource crisis”: resources are running out and resource prices are rising, thus invalidating a particular model. On the other hand, the eco-economy approach is a sustainable future for the economic modelling. The principle of eco-economy is based on a production system, which relies on re-cyclicality (the basis is the production of zero waste production). For this to happen, a transition to a completely new mind-set is needed. The research results were previously approbated during the graduate meeting of the Baltic DBU scholarship holders from 4 to 6 May 2018 in Latvia.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Barbier E. (2011). The Policy Challenges for Green Economy and Sustainable Economic Development. Natural Resources Forum 35(3) 233-245.

  • Bashaasha B. Mangheni M. N. & Nkonya E. (2011 February). Decentralization and Rural Service Delivery in Uganda. International food policy research institute (IFPRI) Discussion Paper 01063.

  • Birkmann J. Garschagen M. Kraas F. & Quang N. (2010). Adaptive Urban Governance: New Challenges for the Second Generation of Urban Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change. Sustainability Science 5(2) 185-206.

  • Boell S. K. & Cecez-Kecmanovic D. (2015). On Being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology 30(2) 161-173.

  • Bojö J. (1991). The Economics of Land Degradation: Theory and Applications to Lesotho. Stockholm School of Economics Economics Research Institute.

  • Bookchin M. (1987). Social Ecology Versus Deep Ecology: A Challenge for the Ecology Movement. Green Perspectives: Newsletter of the Green Program Project 4-5.

  • Boulding K. E. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In H. Jarrett (Ed.) Environmental Quality Issues in a Growing Economy. pp. 3-14

  • Brereton P. Kitchenham B. A. Budgen D. Turner M. & Khalil M. (2007). Lessons From Applying the Systematic Literature Review Process Within the Software Engineering Domain. Journal of Systems and Software 80(4) 571-583.

  • Breure A. M. Lijzen J. P. A. & Maring L. (2018). Soil and Land Management in a Circular Economy. The Science of the Total Environment 624 1125-1130.

  • Buiter W. H. (2003). James Tobin: An Appreciation of His Contribution to Economics. The Economic Journal 113(491) F585-F631.

  • Burlakovs J. Kriipsalu M. Klavins M. Bhatnagar A. Vincevica-Gaile Z. Stenis J. Jani Y. Mykhaylenko V. Denafas G. Turkadze T. Hoglanda M. Rudovica V. Kaczala F. Rosendal R. M. & Hogland M. (2017). Paradigms on Landfill Mining: From Dump Site Scavenging to Ecosystem Services Revitalization. Resources Conservation and Recycling 123 73-84.

  • Cann O. (2015). Seven Ways Geo-economics is Changing the Global Economy. Retrieved March 11 2018 from

  • Costanza R. Wainger L. Folke C. & Mäler K.-G. (1993). Modeling Complex Ecological Economic Systems: Toward an Evolutionary Dynamic Understanding of People and Nature. In Ecosystem Management (pp. 148-163). Springer New York NY.

  • Dasgupta P. S. & Heal G. M. (1979). Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge University Press.

  • de Groot R. Fisher B. Christie M. Aronson J. Braat L. Gowdy J. Haines-Young R. Maltby E. Neuville A. Polasky S. Portela R. & Ring I. (2010). Integrating the Ecological and Economic Dimensions in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Valuation. In P. Kumar (Ed.) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The Ecological and Economic Foundations. London and Washington: TEEB.

  • European Academies’ Science Advisory Council. (2015). Circular Economy: A Commentary From the Perspectives of the Natural and Social Sciences. Belgium: European Academies Science Advisory Council.

  • European Commission. (n. d.). Horizon 2020: Bioeconomy. Retrieved March 15 2018 from

  • European Environment Agency. (2011). Chapter 4: Natural Resources and Waste. Retrieved March 10 2018 from

  • Forde E. (2017). The Ethics of Energy Provisioning: Living Off-Grid in Rural Wales. Energy Research & Social Science 30 82-93.

  • Gill S. E. Handley J. F. Ennos A. R. & Pauleit S. (2007). Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of the Green Infrastructure. Built environment 33(1) 115-133.

  • Government of the Netherlands. (n. d.). Circular Economics: From a Linear to Circular Economy. Retrieved March 14 2018 from

  • Grahl J. & Lysandrou P. (2003). Sand in the Wheels or Spanner in the Works? The Tobin Tax and Global Finance. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27(4) 597-621.

  • Grant M. J. & Booth A. (2009). A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal 26(2) 91-108.

  • Hallegatte S. Henriet F. & Corfee-Morlot J. (2011). The Economics of Climate Change Impacts and Policy Benefits at City Scale: A Conceptual Framework. Climatic Change 104(1) 51-87.

  • Hetemäki L. Hanewinkel M. Muys B. Ollikainen M. Palahí M. Trasobares A. (2017). Leading the Way to a European Circular Bioeconomy Strategy. European Forest Institute.

  • Jiang L. & O’Neill B. C. (2017). Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global Environmental Change 42 193-199.

  • Kotval-K Z. Meitl C. & Kotval Z. (2017). Should the Public Sector Play a Greater Role Funding Brownfield Redevelopment Projects? A Transatlantic Comparison. International Planning Studies 22(4) 366-383.

  • Kvinikadze G. (2016). Towards a Reconceptualization of Geo-Economics: Evolution of Concept Definition. Retrieved from

  • Li P. Omani N. Chaubey I. & Wei X. (2017). Evaluation of Drought Implications on Ecosystem Services: Freshwater Provisioning and Food Provisioning in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14(5) 496.

  • Mäler K. (1974). Environmental Economics. John Hopkins University Press.

  • Martin J. & Henrichs T. (2012). Environmental Indicator Report 2012 - Ecosystem Resilience and Resource Efficiency in a Green Economy in Europe. Retrieved March 9 2018 from

  • Matthew R. A. Brown O. & Jensen D. (2009). From Conflict to Peacebuilding: The Role of Natural Resources and the Environment. UNEP/Earthprint.

  • McKinstry C. Brown T. & Gustafsson L. (2014). Scoping Reviews in Occupational Therapy: The What Why and How to. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 61(2) 58-66.

  • Meadows D. H. Meadows D. L. Randers J. & Behrens W. W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. New York: Potomac Associates - Universe Books 102 27.

  • Meijide A. Gruening C. Goded I. Seufert G. & Cescatti A. (2017). Water management reduces greenhouse gas emissions in a Mediterranean rice paddy field. Agriculture ecosystems & environment 238 168-178.

  • Mirza M. M. Q. (2003). Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events: Can Developing Countries Adapt?. Climate Policy 3(3) 233-248.

  • Naeem S. Cao C. Waqar M. M. Wei C. & Acharya B. K. (2018). Vegetation Role in Controlling the Ecoenvironmental Conditions for Sustainable Urban Environments: A Comparison of Beijing and Islamabad. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 12(1) 016013.

  • Nkonya E. Gerber N. von Braun J. & De Pinto A. (2011). Economics of Land Degradation. IFPRI Issue Brief 68.

  • Nkonya E. Mirzabaev A. & von Braun J. (Eds.). (2016). Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement: A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development. Springer Open.

  • (n. d.). The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 1981: James Tobin. Retrieved March 13 2018 from

  • Patomäki H. (2001). Democratising Globalisation: The Leverage of the Tobin Tax. Zed Books.

  • Qadir M. Quillérou E. Nangia V. Murtaza G. Singh M. Thomas R. J. Drechsel P. & Noble A. D. (2014). Economics of Salt-Induced Land Degradation and Restoration. Natural Resources Forum 38(4) 282-295.

  • Ramirez-Almeyda J. Elbersen B. Monti A. Staritsky I. Panoutsou C. Alexopoulou E. Schrijver R. & Elbersen W. (2017). Assessing the Potentials for Nonfood Crops. In Modeling and Optimization of Biomass Supply Chains (pp. 219-251).

  • Robinson A. K. (2017). The Growth of Singapore and Hong Kong in the Face of Climate Change and Environmental Degradation. International Immersion Program Papers 64.

  • Schmidt O. Padel S. & Levidow L. (2012). The Bio-Economy Concept and Knowledge Base in a Public Goods and Farmer Perspective. Bio-Based and Applied Economics 1(1) 47-63.

  • Shao M. Tang X. Zhang Y. & Li W. (2006). City Clusters in China: Air and Surface Water Pollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4(7) 353-361.[0353:ccicaa];2

  • Smith V. L. (1972). Dynamics of waste accumulation: disposal versus recycling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 86(4) 600-616.

  • Stecher H. & Bailey M. (1999). Time for a Tobin Tax? Some practical and political arguments.

  • Tupenaite L. Lill I. Geipele I. & Naimaviciene J. (2017). Ranking of Sustainability Indicators for Assessment of the New Housing Development Projects: Case of the Baltic States. Resources 6(4).

  • von Braun J. Gerber N. Mirzabaev A. & Nkonya E. (2013). The Economics of Land Degradation. ZEF Working Paper No. 109.

  • Vörösmarty C. J. Green P. Salisbury J. & Lammers R. B. (2000). Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289(5477) 284-288.

  • Wende W. & Darbi M. (2018). Urban ecosystem services and biodiversity offsets. In B. Müller H. Shimizu (Eds.) Towards the Implementation of the New Urban Agenda (pp. 39-47). Springer Cham.

  • (n. d.). Geoeconomics. Retrieved March 9 2018 from

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 379 267 12
PDF Downloads 228 144 1