Housing Heterogeneity Dimensions and Their Elements: a Systemic Approach

Open access


Housing market participants constantly face the housing heterogeneity - the technical and socio-economic differences of dwellings in a certain populated area. Housing heterogeneity often complicates the managerial decision making related to housing transactions, identification and objective evaluation of the quantitative and qualitative aspects of transactions. Housing heterogeneity is an objective phenomenon that implies housing uniqueness - housing distinguishing characteristics divided into specific and interconnected groups within the framework of the research. Most of these differences can be noticed by each market participant, but some of them can be identified only by experienced and professionally trained market participants. Theory and practice have demonstrated that the constituent groups of heterogeneity influence each other and take part in the formation of market value and transaction price of housing units. The increased housing construction intensity, the continuous modernisation of construction technologies and the diversification of building materials used in housing construction, as well as restriction of the building plot of land change the quantitative and qualitative aspects of heterogeneity dimensions. This poses considerable challenges to market participants in the managerial decision making process related to housing transactions. Research results demonstrate that the socio-economic elements of housing heterogeneity are constantly changing under the influence of the dominating factors of the external and internal environment. Therefore, nowadays, housing heterogeneity has become a major cause of information asymmetry, which means that heterogeneity is inherent in the formation of socio-economic market barriers in the housing market.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Agarwal S. Rengarajan S. Sing T. F. & Yang Y. (2016). School allocation rules and housing prices: A quasi-experiment with school relocation events in Singapore. Regional Science and Urban Economics 58 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.02.003

  • Aladdinovna A. (2016). Correlation between corruption and economic crimes in housing and communal services. Ekonomika 62(2) 15-28. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonomika1602015a

  • De Ayala A. Galarraga I. & Spadaro J. V. (2016). The price of energy efficiency in the Spanish housing market. Energy Policy 94 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.032

  • Balta-Ozkan N. Boteler B. & Amerighi O. (2014). European smart home market development: Public views on technical and economic aspects across the United Kingdom Germany and Italy. Energy Research & Social Science 3 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.007

  • Castellano J. Ribera A. & Ciurana J. (2016). Integrated system approach to evaluate social environmental and economics impacts of buildings for users of housings. Energy and Buildings 123 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.046

  • Cervero R. & Duncan M. (2004). Neighbourhood composition and residential land prices: does exclusion raise or lower values? Urban Studies 41(2) 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000165262

  • Clapham D. Franklin B. & Saugères L. (2000). Housing Management: The social construction of an occupational role. Housing Theory and Society 17(2) 68-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/140360900457740

  • Claudy M. & Michelsen C. (2016). Housing Market Fundamentals Housing Quality and EnergyConsumption: Evidence from Germany. The Energy Journal 37(4) 25-43. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.4.mcla

  • Daud N. (2015). Real Estate Education: Taking Needs and Issues into Consideration. Articles of 7th WAVO Valuation Congress (12th - 13th November 2015. Beijing. China. Retrieved October 10 2016 from http://www.wavoglobal.org

  • Dezhi L. Yanchao C. Hongxia C. Kai G. Chi-Man Hui E. & Yang J. (2016). Assessing the integrated sustainability of a public rental housing project from the perspective of complex ecosystem. Habitat International 53 546-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.01.001

  • Gao L. W. & Ho D. C. W. (2016). Explaining the outcomes of multi-owned housing management: A collective action perspective. Habitat International 57 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.08.005

  • Gao W. & Chen G.-Z. (2016). Does owner heterogeneity matter in the management of multiowned housing? Habitat International 53 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.015

  • Garth D. (2006). Crime Neighborhood and Public Housing. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC. ISBN: 1-59332-144-9

  • Geipele S. & Slava D. (2012). Legal and economic problems of housing management in Latvia. Economics and Business 22 144-153.

  • Gustavsson E. & Elander I. (2016). Sustainability potential of a redevelopment initiative in Swedish public housing: The ambiguous role of residents’ participation and place identity. Progress in Planning 103 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2014.10.003

  • Hanlon J. (2014). Fair Housing Policy and the Abandonment of Public Housing Desegregation. Housing Studies 30(1) 78-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2014.933781

  • Haurin D. R. & Brasington D. (1996). School Quality and Real House Prices: Inter- and Intrametropolitan Effects. Journal of Housing Economics 5(4) 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhec.1996.0018

  • Heitel S. Kämpf-Dern A. & Pfnür A. (2015). Integration of stakeholder interests in housing companies’ strategic management. Property Management 33(3) 224-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/pm-05-2014-0026

  • Heijden H. (2013). West European housing system in a comparative perspective. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV. ISBN: 978-1-61499-194-6

  • Hernández D. (2016). Affording Housing at the Expense of Health. Journal of Family Issues 37(7) 921-946. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x14530970

  • Huh S. & Kwak S.-J. (1997). The Choice of Functional Form and Variables in the Hedonic Price Model in Seoul. Urban Studies 34(7) 989-998. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098975691

  • Koopman M. J. (2012). Economic Analysis of Neighborhood Quality Neighborhood Reputation and The Housing Market. Sustainable Urban Areas. Vol. 44. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV. ISBN: 9781614990338

  • Kurlat P. & Stroebel J. (2015). Testing for Information Asymmetries in Real Estate Markets. Review of Financial Studies 28(8) 2429-2461. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv028

  • Lindbergh L. & Wilson T. L. (2016). Strategic management in Swedish municipal housing. Property Management 34(2) 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/pm-07-2015-0030

  • O’Sullivan T. & Gibb K. (2008). Housing Economics and Public Policy. Oxford UK: Blackwell Science Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690680

  • Osland L. Thorsen I. S. & Thorsen I. (2016). Accounding for Local Spatial Heterogeneities in Housing Market Studies. Journal of Regional Science 56(5) 895-920. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12281

  • Parker D. (2016). International Valuation Standards: A Guide to the Valuation of Real Property Assets Oxford UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118329795

  • Peterson N. M. Peterson T. R. & Jianguo L. (2013). The Housing Bomb: Why Our Addiction to Houses Is Destroying the Environment and Threatening Our Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN-13: 978-1-4214-1065-4.

  • Posey S. (2016). The Roots of the Modern Housing Crisis. New Politics 15(4) 40-42.

  • Reed R. R. & Ume E. S. (2016). Housing and unemployment: The search for the “American Dream.” Journal of Macroeconomics 48 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2016.01.001

  • Rosen S. (1974). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy 82(1) 34-55. https://doi.org/10.1086/260169

  • Rubio M. (2014). Housing-market heterogeneity in a monetary union. Journal of International Money and Finance 40 163-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.06.013

  • Seinre E. Kurnitski J. & Voll H. (2014). Quantification of environmental and economic impacts for main categories of building labeling schemes. Energy and Buildings 70 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.11.048

  • Swinkoski A. (2012). Troubled affordable housing: bridging the gap. Journal of Property Management 77(1) 16-20. ISSN: 1755-2478.

  • Voborníková P. (2014). Divided We Live: Racial and Ethnic Segregation in Housing in the U.S. The Scientific Journal of Humanistic Studies 6(10) 43-51. ISSN 2066-8880.

  • Wen X.-C. & He L.-Y. (2015). Housing demand or money supply? A new Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model on China’s housing market fluctuations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications. 432 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.03.040

  • White L. J. (2016). Housing Policy The Morning After. Milken Institute Review: A Journal of Economic Policy. 64-78. ISSN: 033-5533.

  • Whittaker E. Flatau P. R. Swift W. Dobbins T. A. & Burns L. (2016). Associations of Housing First Configuration and Crime and Social Connectedness Among Persons With Chronic Homelessness Histories. Psychiatric Services 67(10) 1091-1097. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201500446

  • Yau Y. (2012). Willingness to participate in collective action: the case of multiowned housing management. Journal of Urban Affairs 35(2) 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00621.x

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 209 113 3
PDF Downloads 166 105 5