Determinants of Corruption Perception in a Transition Country: Case of Albania

Open access


In many aspects, Albania as a transition country has several weaknesses when compared to its neighbor countries. Even though the collapse of the communist regime was reached at almost the same time with other Balkan countries, Albania still remains outside the European Union and has to face an immature government and problematic progress in several areas. Corruption is one of the most problematic issues in Albania. This research paper is based on the data collected by IDRA Research & Consulting and in the course of empirical analysis. It studies the relation between corruption and the microeconomic factors, categorized as demographic and socio-economic factors. In other words, this study aims to examine why some individuals are more willing to accept corruption than other. Based on prominent previous studies in this field, which were discussed to a relatively limited degree, this paper aims to build an empirical model for Albania that helps to explain why some individuals are more tolerant with regard to corruption. As previous studies have shown, such factors as gender, the area of living, region, experience or wrong conception are expected to be listed among the indicators that determine perception of corruption. This study takes into account the findings of literature review when setting up the regression. The results argue that factors such as the area of living, political orientation, the level of trust in institutions, personal experience with corruption, and the right conception of corruption are important factors determining the level of corruption perception.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amundsen I. (1999). Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute: Working Paper 99:7.

  • Chang E. C. C. & Huang S.-h. (2016). Corruption Experience Corruption Tolerance and Institutional Trust in East Asian Democracies. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 12(1) 27-44.

  • IDRA Institute. (2016). Corruption in Albania: perceptions and experiences 2015-2016. Tirana.

  • Jaime-Castillo A. M. & Martinez-Cousinou G. (2012). Distributive effects and moral justification of corruption. Conference paper presented at Second ISA Forum of Sociology 2012.

  • Lavena C. F. (2013). What Determines Permissiveness Toward Corruption? Public Integrity 15(4) 345-366.

  • Lee W.-S. & Guven C. (2013). Engaging in Corruption: The Influence of Cultural Values and Contagion Effectsat the Micro Level. Journal of Economic Psychology 39 287-300.

  • Melgar N. Rossi M. & Smith T. W. (2010). The perception of corruption in a cross-country perspective: why are some individuals more perceptive than others? Economia Aplicada 14(2) 183-198.

  • Moreno A. (2002). Corruption and Democracy: A Cultural Assessment. Comparative Sociology 1(3) 495-507.

  • Nye J. S. (1967). Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. American Political Science Review 61(02) 417-427.

  • Sullivan J. L. Piereson J. & Marcus G. E. (1979). An Alternative Conceptualization of Political Tolerance: Illusory Increases 1950s-1970s. American Political Science Review 73(03) 781-794.

  • Swamy A. V. Lee Y. Azfar O. & Knack S. (2000). Gender and Corruption. IRIS Center Working Paper No. 232 33 p.

  • Torgler B. & Valev N. T. (2004). Corruption and age Working paper No. 2004 - 24.

  • Transparency International. (1995). Corruption Perceptions Index: Early Editions. Retrieved from Transparency International

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 350 176 6
PDF Downloads 242 148 5