Mars and Venus in Action? The US and EU’s foreign relations strategies in academic discourse

  • 1 Institute of International Relations and Political Science, Vilnius University

Abstract

This article reviews the existing academic literature that compares and explains the differences between the US and the EU’s external actions. An analytical matrix is devised to group publications by level of analysis (micro-, mid-, and macro) and by theme of comparison criteria. The key findings are that in the macro level of analysis, authors tend to compare the role actors have in international relations before claiming either that the EU is a different kind of power due to its peculiar historical experience, or that the EU is weak due to its complicated structure and lack of military capacities. Furthermore, authors conducting their analyses at the micro level tend to find more similarities between the EU and the US’s external actions than those working at the macro level. The article concludes by making a point in favour of further comparisons as an essential tool to better understand the EU and other actors in international relations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allen, D., Smith, M., 1990. Western Europe’s presence in the contemporary international arena. Review of International Studies. Vol. 16(1), pp. 19–37.

  • Anaz, N., 2011. Understanding the contemporary United States and European Union foreign policy in the Middle East. Estudios Políticos. Vol. 38, pp. 175–194.

  • Andrews, D., 2005. The Atlantic Alliance Under Stress. US–European Relations After Iraq, Cambridge University Press.

  • Asmus, R., Pollac, M.K. 2002. The New Transatlantic Project. A Response to Robert Kagan, Policy Review; Washington Iss. 115, Oct/Nov, pp. 3–18.

  • Balibar, E., 2003. Which Power? Whose Weakness? On Robert Kagan’s Critique of European Ideology [pdf]. Theory & Event, vol. 6 no. 4, 2003. Available at: <https://muse.jhu.edu/article/44779> [Accessed 2017 07 25]

  • Barbé, E., Johansson-Nogués E. 2008. The EU as a Modest ‘Force for Good’: The European Neighbourhood Policy. International Affairs, Vol. 84, pp. 81–96.

  • Berenskoetter, F.S., 2005. Mapping the Mind Gap: A Comparison of US and European Security Strategies. Security Dialogue. Vol. 36, no. 1, March 2005, pp. 71–92.

  • Börzel, T., A. Risse, T., Dandashly A., 2015a. Responses to the “Arabellions”: The EU in Comparative Perspective, Journal of European Integration, Volume 37, 2015 – Issue 1, pp. 1–17.

  • Börzel, T., A. Risse, T., Dandashly A., 2015b. The EU, External Actors, and the Arabellions: Much Ado About (Almost) Nothing. Journal of European Integration, Volume 37, 2015 – Issue 1, pp. 135–153.

  • Brattberg, E., Rhinard M., 2012. The EU and US as International Actors in Disaster Relief. Bruges Political Research Papers / Cahiers de recherche politique de Bruges, No 22, pp. 1–36.

  • Bretherton, C., Vogler, J., 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor (2nd ed.), London: Routledge.

  • Bretherton, C., Vogler, J.,1999. The European Union as a Global Actor, London: Routledge.

  • Bridoux, J., Kurki, M., 2015. Cosmetic agreements and the cracks beneath: ideological convergences and divergences in US and EU democracy promotion in civil society, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 28:1, pp. 55–74.

  • Brieg T. P., 2009. The stability syndrome: US and EU democracy promotion in Tunisia. The Journal of North African Studies, 14:1, pp. 57–73.

  • Bruszt L., Greskovits B., 2009. Transnationalization, Social Integration, and Capitalist Diversity in the East and the South. Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 44, pp. 411–434.

  • Bruszt, L., McDermott, A., 2011. Integrating Rule Takers: Transnational Integration Regimes Shaping Institutional Change in Emerging Market Democracies. Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 19 – Issue 5, pp. 742–778.

  • Bruszt, L., McDermott, A., 2014. Assembling Level Playing Field: Transnational Regulatory Integration and Institutional Change in Emerging Markets, Oxford University Press.

  • Bruszt, L., McDermott, A., 2016. Transnational regulatory integration and development: A new framework for institutional change, RAE, São Paulo, V. 56, n. 4 jul-ago 2016, pp. 447–455.

  • Buzan B., Gonzalez Pelaez A., 2005. ‘International Community’ after Iraq. International Affairs, Vol. 81, No.1, pp. 31–52.

  • Cavatorta, F., Durac, V., 2009. Diverging or converging dynamics? EU and US policies in North Africa – an introduction. The Journal of North African Studies, 14 (1). pp. 1–9.

  • Cavatorta, F., Durac, V., 2013. The Foreign Policies of the European Union and the United States in North Africa: Diverging or Converging Dynamics, Routledge.

  • Cofman Wittes, T., R. Youngs, 2009. Europe, the United States, and Middle Eastern Democracy: Repairing the Breach, The Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookiings Insitution, Analysis paper no. 18.

  • Cox, M. 2003. Commentary: Martians and Venutians in the New World Order. International Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 523–532.

  • Cox, M., 2012. Too Big To Fail?: The Transatlantic Relationship from Bush to Obama, Global Policy Volume 3. Supplement 1, pp. 71–77.

  • Daalder I. H., 2001. Are the United States and Europe Heading for Divorce? International Affairs, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 553–567.

  • Del Biondo, K., 2015. Promoting democracy or the external context? Comparing the substance of EU and US democracy assistance in Ethiopia. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 28:1, pp. 95–114.

  • Del Biondo, K., 2016. The EU, the United States and Partnership in Development Cooperation: Bridging the Gap? The Journal of Development Studies, pp. 1–16.

  • Diez, T. 2013. Normative power as hegemony, Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), pp. 194–210.

  • Diez, T., 2005. Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering `Normative Power Europe´, Millennium, Vol 33, Issue 3, pp. 613 – 636.

  • Dimon D., 2006. EU and US Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. The International Trade Journal, 20:2, pp. 185–218.

  • Drieskens, E., 2017. Golden or gilded jubilee? A research agenda for actorness, Journal of European Public Policy, 24:10, pp. 1534–1546.

  • Durac, V., Cavatorta F., 2009. Strengthening Authoritarian Rule through Democracy Promotion? Examining the Paradox of the US and EU Security Strategies: The Case of Bin Ali’s Tunisia. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 36:1, pp. 3–19.

  • Escribano, Úbeda-Portugués, J., 2007. La realización del Espacio Eurolatinoamericano en el contexto del Nuevo Regionalismo. Reflexión Política, vol. 9, núm. 17, pp. 24–31.

  • Frabbrini, S., Sicurelli D., 2008. Bringing Policy-Making Structure Back In: Why are the US and the EU Pursuing Different Foreign Policies? International Politics, vol. 45, pp. 292–309.

  • Gamble, A, Payne, A.,. 1996. Conclusion: The New Regionalism. In A. Gamble and A. Payne (eds.) Regionalism and World Order, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 247–64.

  • Garlicki, M., 2014. Differences between American and European approaches to security policy after the Cold War. Przegląd europejski, Nr 2 (32), pp. 70–80.

  • Grugel, J. B., 2004. New Regionalism and Modes of Governance — Comparing US and EU Strategies in Latin America. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 10(4), pp. 603–626.

  • Hamilton, D.S., 2008. The United States: A Normative Power? CEPS Working Document No. 291.

  • Haukkala, H., 2008. The European Union as a Regional Normative Hegemon: The Case of European Neighbourhood Policy, Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 60, No. 9 (Nov., 2008), pp. 1601–1622.

  • Haukkala, H., 2017. The EU’s Regional Normative Hegemony Encounters Hard Realities: The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy and the Ring of Fire, in D. Bouris, T. Schumacher (eds.), The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 77–94.

  • Heiduk F., 2011. Policing Mars or Venus? Comparing European and US approaches to police assistance. European Security, 20:3, 363–383.

  • Hettne, B., Ponjaert F., 2014. Interregionalism and World Order: The Diverging EU and US Models. In: Telo M. (ed.) European Union and New Regionalism: Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-hegemonic Era, The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, pp. 115–138.

  • Hoffmann, N., Niemann, A., 2018. EU Actorness and the European Neighbourhood Policy. In Scumacher T., Marchetti, A., Demmelhuber, T., (ed.) The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy. Routledge, pp. 27–36.

  • Holden, P., 2009. Security, power or profit? The economic diplomacy of the US and the EU in North Africa. The Journal of North African Studies, 14:1, pp. 11–32.

  • Huber, D., 2008. Democracy Assistance in the Middle East and North Africa: A Comparison of US and EU Policies. Mediterranean Politics, vol. 13:1, pp. 43–62.

  • Huber, D., 2015. Democracy Promotion and Foreign Policy Identity and Interests in US, EU and Non-Western Democracies, Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Huber, Daniela. Youth as a New ‘Foreign Policy Challenge’ in Middle East and North Africa: A Critical Interrogation of European Union and US Youth Policies in Morocco and Tunisia. European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 111–128.

  • Hyde-Price, A., 2006. ‘Normative’ power Europe: a realist critique, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:2, pp. 217–234.

  • Johnson, K., de Luce, D., Tamkin, E., 2018. “Can the U.S.-Europe Alliance Survive Trump?”, Foreign Policy, May. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/18/can-the-u-s-europe-alliance-survive-trump/ [Accessed 2018 08 25].

  • Jones, C., 2008. Seduce Me: Kagan, Power, the US and Europe. International Politics, vol. 45, pp. 266–275.

  • Jones, E., 2004. Debating the transatlantic relationship: rhetoric and reality. International Affairs, vol. 80 - 4, pp. 595–612.

  • Jupille, J. and Caporaso, J.A., 1998. ‘States, agency and rules: the European Union in global environmental politics’, in C. Rhodes (ed.), The European Union in the World Community, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 213–29.

  • Kagan, R., 2002. Power and Weakness. Policy Review, no. 13, pp. 3–28.

  • Kagan, R., 2003. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.

  • Keohane, R., 2002. Ironies of Sovereignty: The European Union and the United States. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40–4, pp. 743–765.

  • Khanna P., 2009. The Metrosexual Superpower. The stylish European Union struts past the bumbling United States on the catwalk of global diplomacy, Foreign Policy. Available at: <http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/27/the-metrosexual-superpower/> [Accessed 2017 08 20].

  • Kissinger, H., Summers L. H., Kupchan C. A., 2004. Renewing the Atlantic Partnership. Report of an Independent Task Force Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations the Council on Foreign Relations.

  • Klose, S., 2018. Theorizing the EU’s Actorness: Towards an Interactionist Role Theory Framework. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 56. Number 5. pp. 1144–1160.

  • Kopstein, J., 2006. The transatlantic divide over democracy promotion. The Washington Quarterly, vol. 29:2, pp. 85–98.

  • Krizic, I., Serrano, O. 2017. Exporting Intellectual Property Rights to Emerging Countries: EU and US Approaches Compared. European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 57–76.

  • Lavenex, S., Jurje, F. 2017. EU/US Migration Policy Towards Emerging Countries: Regulatory Power Reversed? European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22, pp. 157–176.

  • Lavenex, S., Krizic I., Serrano O., 2017. EU and US Regulatory Power Under Strain? Emerging Countries and the Limits of External. European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22, no.1, pp. 1–18.

  • Manners, I., 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40. Number 2. pp. 235–258.

  • Martin-Mazé, M., 2015. Unpacking Interests in Normative Power Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 53, Issue 6, pp. 285–1300.

  • Moravscik, A., 2017. Europe is Still a Super Power. Foreign Policy. April 13. Available at: < http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/04/13/europe-is-still-a-superpower/> [Accessed 2017 10 14].

  • Murau, S., Spandler K., 2016. EU, US and ASEAN Actorness in G20 Financial Policy-Making: Bridging the EU Studies–New Regionalism Divide, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 54, Issue 4, pp. 928–943.

  • Nincic, M., Narayan Datta M. 2007. Of Paradise, Power, and Pachyderms. Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 239–256.

  • Oehri, M., 2017. Labour Rights Promotion in the Absence of Conditionality? How the EU and the US Engage China and India. European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22, pp. 137–156.

  • Oliverio, A., 2008. US versus European Approaches to Terrorism: Size Really Does Matter. Policing, Vol 2:4, pp. 452–462.

  • Omelicheva M. Y., 2015. Competing perspectives on democracy and democratization: assessing alternative models of democracy promoted in Central Asian states.

  • Cambridge Review of International Affairs. Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 75–94.

  • Rees, W., 2011. The US-EU Security Relationship. The Tensions between a European and a Global Agenda, Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Risse T., 2015. The Diffusion of Regionalism, Regional Institutions, Regional Governance. Paper presented at the EUSA 2015 Conference, Boston, USA, March 5–7, 2015.

  • Sbragia A., 2014. European Union and NAFTA. In: Telo M. (ed.), European Union and New Regionalism: Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-hegemonic Era, The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., pp. 153–164.

  • Selden, Z., 2010. Power Is Always in Fashion: State-Centric Realism and the European Security and Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, no. 48(2), 2010, pp. 397–416.

  • Sicurelli, D., Fabbrini S., 2014. An institutional approach to foreign policy-making: the EU, the USA and crisis management in Africa, Journal of Transatlantic Studies, Vol. 12 – 1, pp. 41–61.

  • Sjöstedt, G. 1977., The External Role of the European Community, Westmead: Saxon House.

  • Stahn, A., van Hüllen V., 2007. Different actors, different tools? Approaching EU and US democracy promotion in the Mediterranean and the Newly Independent States. Paper presented in the European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Tenth Biennial International Conference, May 17–19, 2007, Montreal, Canada.

  • Telo, M., 2007. European Union and New Regionalism: Regional Actors and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era, The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

  • Telo, M., 2014. European Union and New Regionalism: Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era, The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series, Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

  • Tocci, N., 2008. The European Union as a Normative Foreign Policy Actor, CEPS Working Documents No. 281.

  • Tortola, P. D., 2014. The Limits of Normalization: Taking Stock of the EU-US Comparative Literature. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 52 - 6, November, Pages 1342–1357.

  • Wolff, J., Wurm I. 2010. Towards a Theory of External Democracy Promotion? Approximations from the perspective of International Relations theories. Paper prepared for the 51st Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA), New Orleans, LA, February 17–20.

  • Wright, N., 2011. The European Union: What Kind of International Actor? Political Perspectives. Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 8–32.

  • Youngs, R., 2004. Normative Dynamics and Strategic Interests in the EU’s External Identity. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 42, Issue 2, pp. 415–435.

  • Zielonka, J., 2011. The EU as an International Actor: Unique or Ordinary. European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 16, pp. 281–301.

  • Zyla B., 2015. Untying the Knot? Assessing the compatibility of the American and European strategic culture under President Obama. The European Journal of Social Science Research, no. 28:2, pp. 104–126.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search