Mars and Venus in Action? The US and EU’s foreign relations strategies in academic discourse

Open access

Abstract

This article reviews the existing academic literature that compares and explains the differences between the US and the EU’s external actions. An analytical matrix is devised to group publications by level of analysis (micro-, mid-, and macro) and by theme of comparison criteria. The key findings are that in the macro level of analysis, authors tend to compare the role actors have in international relations before claiming either that the EU is a different kind of power due to its peculiar historical experience, or that the EU is weak due to its complicated structure and lack of military capacities. Furthermore, authors conducting their analyses at the micro level tend to find more similarities between the EU and the US’s external actions than those working at the macro level. The article concludes by making a point in favour of further comparisons as an essential tool to better understand the EU and other actors in international relations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allen D. Smith M. 1990. Western Europe’s presence in the contemporary international arena. Review of International Studies. Vol. 16(1) pp. 19–37.

  • Anaz N. 2011. Understanding the contemporary United States and European Union foreign policy in the Middle East. Estudios Políticos. Vol. 38 pp. 175–194.

  • Andrews D. 2005. The Atlantic Alliance Under Stress. US–European Relations After Iraq Cambridge University Press.

  • Asmus R. Pollac M.K. 2002. The New Transatlantic Project. A Response to Robert Kagan Policy Review; Washington Iss. 115 Oct/Nov pp. 3–18.

  • Balibar E. 2003. Which Power? Whose Weakness? On Robert Kagan’s Critique of European Ideology [pdf]. Theory & Event vol. 6 no. 4 2003. Available at: <https://muse.jhu.edu/article/44779> [Accessed 2017 07 25]

  • Barbé E. Johansson-Nogués E. 2008. The EU as a Modest ‘Force for Good’: The European Neighbourhood Policy. International Affairs Vol. 84 pp. 81–96.

  • Berenskoetter F.S. 2005. Mapping the Mind Gap: A Comparison of US and European Security Strategies. Security Dialogue. Vol. 36 no. 1 March 2005 pp. 71–92.

  • Börzel T. A. Risse T. Dandashly A. 2015a. Responses to the “Arabellions”: The EU in Comparative Perspective Journal of European Integration Volume 37 2015 – Issue 1 pp. 1–17.

  • Börzel T. A. Risse T. Dandashly A. 2015b. The EU External Actors and the Arabellions: Much Ado About (Almost) Nothing. Journal of European Integration Volume 37 2015 – Issue 1 pp. 135–153.

  • Brattberg E. Rhinard M. 2012. The EU and US as International Actors in Disaster Relief. Bruges Political Research Papers / Cahiers de recherche politique de Bruges No 22 pp. 1–36.

  • Bretherton C. Vogler J. 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor (2nd ed.) London: Routledge.

  • Bretherton C. Vogler J.1999. The European Union as a Global Actor London: Routledge.

  • Bridoux J. Kurki M. 2015. Cosmetic agreements and the cracks beneath: ideological convergences and divergences in US and EU democracy promotion in civil society Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28:1 pp. 55–74.

  • Brieg T. P. 2009. The stability syndrome: US and EU democracy promotion in Tunisia. The Journal of North African Studies 14:1 pp. 57–73.

  • Bruszt L. Greskovits B. 2009. Transnationalization Social Integration and Capitalist Diversity in the East and the South. Studies in Comparative International Development vol. 44 pp. 411–434.

  • Bruszt L. McDermott A. 2011. Integrating Rule Takers: Transnational Integration Regimes Shaping Institutional Change in Emerging Market Democracies. Review of International Political Economy Vol. 19 – Issue 5 pp. 742–778.

  • Bruszt L. McDermott A. 2014. Assembling Level Playing Field: Transnational Regulatory Integration and Institutional Change in Emerging Markets Oxford University Press.

  • Bruszt L. McDermott A. 2016. Transnational regulatory integration and development: A new framework for institutional change RAE São Paulo V. 56 n. 4 jul-ago 2016 pp. 447–455.

  • Buzan B. Gonzalez Pelaez A. 2005. ‘International Community’ after Iraq. International Affairs Vol. 81 No.1 pp. 31–52.

  • Cavatorta F. Durac V. 2009. Diverging or converging dynamics? EU and US policies in North Africa – an introduction. The Journal of North African Studies 14 (1). pp. 1–9.

  • Cavatorta F. Durac V. 2013. The Foreign Policies of the European Union and the United States in North Africa: Diverging or Converging Dynamics Routledge.

  • Cofman Wittes T. R. Youngs 2009. Europe the United States and Middle Eastern Democracy: Repairing the Breach The Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookiings Insitution Analysis paper no. 18.

  • Cox M. 2003. Commentary: Martians and Venutians in the New World Order. International Affairs Vol. 79 No. 3 pp. 523–532.

  • Cox M. 2012. Too Big To Fail?: The Transatlantic Relationship from Bush to Obama Global Policy Volume 3. Supplement 1 pp. 71–77.

  • Daalder I. H. 2001. Are the United States and Europe Heading for Divorce? International Affairs Vol. 77 No. 3 pp. 553–567.

  • Del Biondo K. 2015. Promoting democracy or the external context? Comparing the substance of EU and US democracy assistance in Ethiopia. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28:1 pp. 95–114.

  • Del Biondo K. 2016. The EU the United States and Partnership in Development Cooperation: Bridging the Gap? The Journal of Development Studies pp. 1–16.

  • Diez T. 2013. Normative power as hegemony Cooperation and Conflict 48(2) pp. 194–210.

  • Diez T. 2005. Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering `Normative Power Europe´ Millennium Vol 33 Issue 3 pp. 613 – 636.

  • Dimon D. 2006. EU and US Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. The International Trade Journal 20:2 pp. 185–218.

  • Drieskens E. 2017. Golden or gilded jubilee? A research agenda for actorness Journal of European Public Policy 24:10 pp. 1534–1546.

  • Durac V. Cavatorta F. 2009. Strengthening Authoritarian Rule through Democracy Promotion? Examining the Paradox of the US and EU Security Strategies: The Case of Bin Ali’s Tunisia. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies vol. 36:1 pp. 3–19.

  • Escribano Úbeda-Portugués J. 2007. La realización del Espacio Eurolatinoamericano en el contexto del Nuevo Regionalismo. Reflexión Política vol. 9 núm. 17 pp. 24–31.

  • Frabbrini S. Sicurelli D. 2008. Bringing Policy-Making Structure Back In: Why are the US and the EU Pursuing Different Foreign Policies? International Politics vol. 45 pp. 292–309.

  • Gamble A Payne A.. 1996. Conclusion: The New Regionalism. In A. Gamble and A. Payne (eds.) Regionalism and World Order Basingstoke: Macmillan pp. 247–64.

  • Garlicki M. 2014. Differences between American and European approaches to security policy after the Cold War. Przegląd europejski Nr 2 (32) pp. 70–80.

  • Grugel J. B. 2004. New Regionalism and Modes of Governance — Comparing US and EU Strategies in Latin America. European Journal of International Relations Vol. 10(4) pp. 603–626.

  • Hamilton D.S. 2008. The United States: A Normative Power? CEPS Working Document No. 291.

  • Haukkala H. 2008. The European Union as a Regional Normative Hegemon: The Case of European Neighbourhood Policy Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 60 No. 9 (Nov. 2008) pp. 1601–1622.

  • Haukkala H. 2017. The EU’s Regional Normative Hegemony Encounters Hard Realities: The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy and the Ring of Fire in D. Bouris T. Schumacher (eds.) The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy Palgrave Macmillan pp. 77–94.

  • Heiduk F. 2011. Policing Mars or Venus? Comparing European and US approaches to police assistance. European Security 20:3 363–383.

  • Hettne B. Ponjaert F. 2014. Interregionalism and World Order: The Diverging EU and US Models. In: Telo M. (ed.) European Union and New Regionalism: Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-hegemonic Era The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series Ashgate Publishing Ltd pp. 115–138.

  • Hoffmann N. Niemann A. 2018. EU Actorness and the European Neighbourhood Policy. In Scumacher T. Marchetti A. Demmelhuber T. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy. Routledge pp. 27–36.

  • Holden P. 2009. Security power or profit? The economic diplomacy of the US and the EU in North Africa. The Journal of North African Studies 14:1 pp. 11–32.

  • Huber D. 2008. Democracy Assistance in the Middle East and North Africa: A Comparison of US and EU Policies. Mediterranean Politics vol. 13:1 pp. 43–62.

  • Huber D. 2015. Democracy Promotion and Foreign Policy Identity and Interests in US EU and Non-Western Democracies Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Huber Daniela. Youth as a New ‘Foreign Policy Challenge’ in Middle East and North Africa: A Critical Interrogation of European Union and US Youth Policies in Morocco and Tunisia. European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22 no. 1 pp. 111–128.

  • Hyde-Price A. 2006. ‘Normative’ power Europe: a realist critique Journal of European Public Policy 13:2 pp. 217–234.

  • Johnson K. de Luce D. Tamkin E. 2018. “Can the U.S.-Europe Alliance Survive Trump?” Foreign Policy May. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/05/18/can-the-u-s-europe-alliance-survive-trump/ [Accessed 2018 08 25].

  • Jones C. 2008. Seduce Me: Kagan Power the US and Europe. International Politics vol. 45 pp. 266–275.

  • Jones E. 2004. Debating the transatlantic relationship: rhetoric and reality. International Affairs vol. 80 - 4 pp. 595–612.

  • Jupille J. and Caporaso J.A. 1998. ‘States agency and rules: the European Union in global environmental politics’ in C. Rhodes (ed.) The European Union in the World Community Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner pp. 213–29.

  • Kagan R. 2002. Power and Weakness. Policy Review no. 13 pp. 3–28.

  • Kagan R. 2003. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order New York Alfred A. Knopf.

  • Keohane R. 2002. Ironies of Sovereignty: The European Union and the United States. Journal of Common Market Studies Vol. 40–4 pp. 743–765.

  • Khanna P. 2009. The Metrosexual Superpower. The stylish European Union struts past the bumbling United States on the catwalk of global diplomacy Foreign Policy. Available at: <http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/27/the-metrosexual-superpower/> [Accessed 2017 08 20].

  • Kissinger H. Summers L. H. Kupchan C. A. 2004. Renewing the Atlantic Partnership. Report of an Independent Task Force Sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations the Council on Foreign Relations.

  • Klose S. 2018. Theorizing the EU’s Actorness: Towards an Interactionist Role Theory Framework. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 56. Number 5. pp. 1144–1160.

  • Kopstein J. 2006. The transatlantic divide over democracy promotion. The Washington Quarterly vol. 29:2 pp. 85–98.

  • Krizic I. Serrano O. 2017. Exporting Intellectual Property Rights to Emerging Countries: EU and US Approaches Compared. European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22 no. 1 pp. 57–76.

  • Lavenex S. Jurje F. 2017. EU/US Migration Policy Towards Emerging Countries: Regulatory Power Reversed? European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22 pp. 157–176.

  • Lavenex S. Krizic I. Serrano O. 2017. EU and US Regulatory Power Under Strain? Emerging Countries and the Limits of External. European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22 no.1 pp. 1–18.

  • Manners I. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies Vol. 40. Number 2. pp. 235–258.

  • Martin-Mazé M. 2015. Unpacking Interests in Normative Power Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 53 Issue 6 pp. 285–1300.

  • Moravscik A. 2017. Europe is Still a Super Power. Foreign Policy. April 13. Available at: < http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/04/13/europe-is-still-a-superpower/> [Accessed 2017 10 14].

  • Murau S. Spandler K. 2016. EU US and ASEAN Actorness in G20 Financial Policy-Making: Bridging the EU Studies–New Regionalism Divide Journal of Common Market Studies Vol. 54 Issue 4 pp. 928–943.

  • Nincic M. Narayan Datta M. 2007. Of Paradise Power and Pachyderms. Political Science Quarterly Vol. 122 No. 2 pp. 239–256.

  • Oehri M. 2017. Labour Rights Promotion in the Absence of Conditionality? How the EU and the US Engage China and India. European Foreign Affairs Review. Vol. 22 pp. 137–156.

  • Oliverio A. 2008. US versus European Approaches to Terrorism: Size Really Does Matter. Policing Vol 2:4 pp. 452–462.

  • Omelicheva M. Y. 2015. Competing perspectives on democracy and democratization: assessing alternative models of democracy promoted in Central Asian states.

  • Cambridge Review of International Affairs. Vol. 28 No. 1 pp. 75–94.

  • Rees W. 2011. The US-EU Security Relationship. The Tensions between a European and a Global Agenda Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Risse T. 2015. The Diffusion of Regionalism Regional Institutions Regional Governance. Paper presented at the EUSA 2015 Conference Boston USA March 5–7 2015.

  • Sbragia A. 2014. European Union and NAFTA. In: Telo M. (ed.) European Union and New Regionalism: Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-hegemonic Era The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series Ashgate Publishing Ltd. pp. 153–164.

  • Selden Z. 2010. Power Is Always in Fashion: State-Centric Realism and the European Security and Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies no. 48(2) 2010 pp. 397–416.

  • Sicurelli D. Fabbrini S. 2014. An institutional approach to foreign policy-making: the EU the USA and crisis management in Africa Journal of Transatlantic Studies Vol. 12 – 1 pp. 41–61.

  • Sjöstedt G. 1977. The External Role of the European Community Westmead: Saxon House.

  • Stahn A. van Hüllen V. 2007. Different actors different tools? Approaching EU and US democracy promotion in the Mediterranean and the Newly Independent States. Paper presented in the European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Tenth Biennial International Conference May 17–19 2007 Montreal Canada.

  • Telo M. 2007. European Union and New Regionalism: Regional Actors and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

  • Telo M. 2014. European Union and New Regionalism: Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era The International Political Economy of New Regionalisms Series Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

  • Tocci N. 2008. The European Union as a Normative Foreign Policy Actor CEPS Working Documents No. 281.

  • Tortola P. D. 2014. The Limits of Normalization: Taking Stock of the EU-US Comparative Literature. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 52 - 6 November Pages 1342–1357.

  • Wolff J. Wurm I. 2010. Towards a Theory of External Democracy Promotion? Approximations from the perspective of International Relations theories. Paper prepared for the 51st Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA) New Orleans LA February 17–20.

  • Wright N. 2011. The European Union: What Kind of International Actor? Political Perspectives. Vol. 5 No. 2 pp. 8–32.

  • Youngs R. 2004. Normative Dynamics and Strategic Interests in the EU’s External Identity. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 42 Issue 2 pp. 415–435.

  • Zielonka J. 2011. The EU as an International Actor: Unique or Ordinary. European Foreign Affairs Review Vol. 16 pp. 281–301.

  • Zyla B. 2015. Untying the Knot? Assessing the compatibility of the American and European strategic culture under President Obama. The European Journal of Social Science Research no. 28:2 pp. 104–126.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 12 12 6
PDF Downloads 14 14 2