Party positions on the European union in the Baltic states: do they compete? Do they mirror voters’ positions?

Open access


This paper aims to determine Lithuania’s, Latvia’s, and Estonia’s parties’ positions on the European Union (EU) and to ascertain whether these party positions mirror their voters’ positions on the EU. Analysis suggests that parties in this region have rather varied positions on the EU, with the exception of hard-Eurosceptic views, which are absent in Baltic states’ party systems. This paper also indicates that parties in the Baltic states tend to mirror, with some exceptions, their voters positions on the EU. This suggests that there may be additional factors determining parties’ positions regarding the EU in the Baltics.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Austers A. 2016. The Case Of Latvia: Popular Euroscepticism In Impasse. In: K. Bukovskis ed. 2016. Euroscepticism In Small EU Member States. Riga: Latvian Institute of International Affairs. pp.85-197.

  • Bakker R. de Vries C. Edwards E. Hooghe L. Jolly S. Marks G. Polk J. Rovny J. Steenbergen M. and Vachudova M. A. 2015a. Measuring Party Positions In Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File 1999-2010. Party Politics [e-journal] 21(1) pp.143-152.

  • Bakker R. Edwards E. Hooghe L. Jolly S. Marks G. Polk J. Rovny J. Steenbergen M. and Vachudova M. A. 2015b. 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Version 2015.1. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. [online] Available through [Accessed 16 January 2018].

  • Birch S. 2003. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

  • European Commission 2014. Special Eurobarometer 415: Europeans in 2014. Luxembourg: European Commission.

  • Iversen T. 1994. The Logics of Electoral Politics: Spatial Directional and Mobilizational Effects. Comparative Political Studies [e-journal] 27(2) pp.155-189.

  • Ladrech R. 2011. “(Shallow) Europeanisation and Party System Instability in Post Communist States: How Changing Constraints Undermine the Development of Stable Partisan Linkages.” In: P. Lewis and R. Markowski eds. 2011. Europeanising Party Politics: Comparative perspectives on Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp.218-235.

  • Kieskompas BV 2014. [online] Available through [Accessed 16 January 2018].

  • Kitschelt H. 1995. Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-communist Democracies. Party Politics [e-journal] 1(4) pp.447-472.

  • Mair P. 2008. Political Parties and Party Systems. In: P. Graziano and M. Vink eds. 2008. Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp.154-166.

  • Marks G. Wilson C. J. and Ray L. 2002. National Political Parties and European Integration. American Journal of Political Science [e-journal] 46(3) pp.585-594.

  • Mikkel E. and Kasekamp A. 2008. Emerging Party-based Euroscepticism in Estonia. In: P. Taggart and A. Szczerbiak eds. 2008. Opposing Europe?: The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press. pp.295-314.

  • Ramonaitė A. 2007. Posovietinės Lietuvos politinė anatomija (Political Anatomy of Post-Soviet Lithuania). Vilnius: Versus Aureaus.

  • Saarts T. 2011. Comparative Party System Analysis in Central and Eastern Europe: the Case of the Baltic States. Studies of Transition States and Societies [e-journal] 3(3) pp.83-104.

  • Unikaitė-Jakuntavičienė I. 2014. Eurosceptics In Lithuania: on the Margins of Politics? European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities [e-journal] 3(4) pp.1-21.

  • Vachudova M. A. and Hooghe L. 2009. Postcommunist Politics in a Magnetic Field: How Transition and EU Accession Structure Party Competition on European Integration. Comparative European Politics [e-journal] 7(2) pp.179-212.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 145 77 1
PDF Downloads 65 46 1