Insights into intra-party decision-making in Latvia’s political parties

  • 1 Dr. sc. pol., Lecturer at the Advanced Social and Political Research Institute, University of Latvia, , Riga, Latvia


This article examines the decision-making processes within political parties in Latvia. Two important variables have been chosen for analysis: 1) policy formulation (which actors are involved in the elaboration of election programs), and 2) candidate selection (how parties create their electoral lists). A survey of Saeima (Latvia’s parliamentary body) deputies indicates that party board members have the most say in deciding which individuals to include on electoral lists and which policies to pursue; financial supporters seem to have almost no impact on parties’ internal decision-making processes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Auers, D. (2015) Comparative Politics and Governments of the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 21st Century. Hampshire: Palgrave and Macmillan.

  • Chiru, M. and Gherghina, S. (2012) Keeping the Doors Closed: Leadership Selection in Post-Communist Romania. East European Politics and Societies. 26(3), pp. 510-537.

  • Duverger, M. (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.

  • Ennser-Jedenastik, L. and Müller, W. (2015) Intra-party democracy, political performance and the survival of party leaders: Austria, 1945-2011. Party Politics. 21(4), pp. 930-943.

  • Katz, R. and Mair, P. (1995) Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics. 1(1), pp. 5-28.

  • Katz, R. and Mair, P. (1993) The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization. American Review of Politics. 14(4), pp. 593-617.

  • Kitschelt, H. (2000) Citizens, Politicians, and Party Cartelization: Political Representation and State Failure in Post-Industrial Democracies. European Journal of Political Research. 37(2), pp. 149-179.

  • Latvijas Avīze (2013) Raidījums: noklausītā sarunā plaši atklājas partiju finansēšana no iepirkumiem. Latvijas Avīze [online]. Available from: [Accessed 13 December 2017].

  • Loxbo, K. (2011) The fate of intra-party democracy: Leadership autonomy and activist influence in the mass party and the cartel party. Party Politics. 19(4), pp. 537-554.

  • Mair, P. and Katz, R. (2002) The Ascendency of the Party in Public Office: Party Organizational Change in 20th-Century Democracies. In: Gunther, R., Montero, J. R. and Linz J.J. (eds.) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 113-135.

  • Mair, P. (1994) Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State. In: van Biezen, I. (ed.) On Parties, Party Systems and Democracy: Selected Writings of Peter Mair. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 371-392.

  • Michels, R. (1915/1962) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: The Free Press.

  • Pettitt, R. T. (2012) Exploring Variations in Intra-party Democracy: A Comparative Study of the British Labour Party and the Danish Centre-Left. The British Journal of Political and International Relation. 14(4), pp. 630-650.

  • Saglie, J. and Heidar, K. (2004) Democracy Within Norwegian Political Parties: Complacency or Pressure for Change? Party Politics. 10(4), pp. 385-405.

  • Teorell, J. (1999) A Deliberative Defense of Intra-Party Democracy. Party Politics. 5(3), pp. 363-382.

  • Ware, A. (1979) The logic of party democracy. London: Macmillan.


Journal + Issues