Insights into intra-party decision-making in Latvia’s political parties

Open access


This article examines the decision-making processes within political parties in Latvia. Two important variables have been chosen for analysis: 1) policy formulation (which actors are involved in the elaboration of election programs), and 2) candidate selection (how parties create their electoral lists). A survey of Saeima (Latvia’s parliamentary body) deputies indicates that party board members have the most say in deciding which individuals to include on electoral lists and which policies to pursue; financial supporters seem to have almost no impact on parties’ internal decision-making processes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Auers D. (2015) Comparative Politics and Governments of the Baltic States: Estonia Latvia and Lithuania in the 21st Century. Hampshire: Palgrave and Macmillan.

  • Chiru M. and Gherghina S. (2012) Keeping the Doors Closed: Leadership Selection in Post-Communist Romania. East European Politics and Societies. 26(3) pp. 510-537.

  • Duverger M. (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.

  • Ennser-Jedenastik L. and Müller W. (2015) Intra-party democracy political performance and the survival of party leaders: Austria 1945-2011. Party Politics. 21(4) pp. 930-943.

  • Katz R. and Mair P. (1995) Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics. 1(1) pp. 5-28.

  • Katz R. and Mair P. (1993) The Evolution of Party Organizations in Europe: The Three Faces of Party Organization. American Review of Politics. 14(4) pp. 593-617.

  • Kitschelt H. (2000) Citizens Politicians and Party Cartelization: Political Representation and State Failure in Post-Industrial Democracies. European Journal of Political Research. 37(2) pp. 149-179.

  • Latvijas Avīze (2013) Raidījums: noklausītā sarunā plaši atklājas partiju finansēšana no iepirkumiem. Latvijas Avīze [online]. Available from: [Accessed 13 December 2017].

  • Loxbo K. (2011) The fate of intra-party democracy: Leadership autonomy and activist influence in the mass party and the cartel party. Party Politics. 19(4) pp. 537-554.

  • Mair P. and Katz R. (2002) The Ascendency of the Party in Public Office: Party Organizational Change in 20th-Century Democracies. In: Gunther R. Montero J. R. and Linz J.J. (eds.) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press pp. 113-135.

  • Mair P. (1994) Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State. In: van Biezen I. (ed.) On Parties Party Systems and Democracy: Selected Writings of Peter Mair. Colchester: ECPR Press pp. 371-392.

  • Michels R. (1915/1962) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: The Free Press.

  • Pettitt R. T. (2012) Exploring Variations in Intra-party Democracy: A Comparative Study of the British Labour Party and the Danish Centre-Left. The British Journal of Political and International Relation. 14(4) pp. 630-650.

  • Saglie J. and Heidar K. (2004) Democracy Within Norwegian Political Parties: Complacency or Pressure for Change? Party Politics. 10(4) pp. 385-405.

  • Teorell J. (1999) A Deliberative Defense of Intra-Party Democracy. Party Politics. 5(3) pp. 363-382.

  • Ware A. (1979) The logic of party democracy. London: Macmillan.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 162 48 1
PDF Downloads 68 28 0