Declining systemic trust in the political elite in the EU’s new member states: the divergence between east-central Europe and the baltic states

Open access

Abstract

In the last decade there has been a process of rolling-back Europeanization efforts in the EU’s new member states (NMS), a process intensified by the global crisis. This de-Europeanization and dedemocratization process in the NMS has become a significant part of a more general polycrisis in the EU. The backslide of democracy in the NMS as a topical issue has usually been analysed in terms of macro-politics, formal-legal state institutions, party systems, and macroeconomics. The most significant decline of democratization, however, is evident in the public’s decreasing participation in politics and in the eroding trust. This decline in systemic trust in political elites in the NMS has been largely neglected by analysts. Therefore, this paper concentrates on this relatively overlooked dimension of declining trust and social capital in the NMS. This analysis employs the concepts of governance, trust, and social capital to balance the usual formalistic top-down approach with a bottom-up approach that better illustrates the divergence between East-Central Europe and the Baltic states’ sub-regional development.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aldridge S. Halpern D. 2002. Social Capital: A Discussion Paper. [pdf] Cabinet Office. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Ágh A. 2016a. The increasing core-periphery divide and the new member states: Diverging from the European Union’s mainstream developments. In: J. Magone B. Laffan and Ch. Schweiger eds. 2016. Core-Periphery Relations in European Union. London: Routledge pp. 117-129.

  • Ágh A. 2016b. Increasing Eupopulism as the megatrend in East-Central Europe: From façade democracies to velvet dictatorships. Baltic Journal of Political Science No. 5 pp. 21-39.

  • Ágh A. 2016c. Rocky Road of Europeanization in the New Member States: From democracy capture to the second try of democratization. Polish Sociological Review No. 1 pp. 71-86.

  • Ágh A. 2016d. Deconsolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe: The New World Order and the geopolitical crisis in the EU. Politics in Central Europe Vol. 12. No. 3 pp. 7-36.

  • Bernauer T. Mohrenberg S. Koubi V. 2016. How relevant are input and output legitimacy in international environmental governance? [pdf.] National Centre of Competence in Research Working Paper No. 94. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Bevir M. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Governance. London: Sage p. 576.

  • BF Bertelsmann Foundation 2016. BTI Transformation Index 2016. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung p. 130.

  • Birdwell J. Feve S. Tryhorn C. Vibla N. 2013. Democracy in Europe can no longer be taken for granted. [pdf.] Demos. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Boedeltje M. Cornips J. 2004. Input and output legitimacy in interactive governance [pdf.] Erasmus University. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Buti M. Pichelmann K. 2017. European integration and populism 22 February 2017. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Clawson R. Oxley Z. 2017. Public Opinion: Democratic Ideals Democratic Practice. Sage CQ Press p. 480.

  • Dalton R. Klingemann H.-D eds. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press p. 992.

  • Dimitrova A. 2010. The new member states of the EU in the aftermath of enlargement: do new European rules remain empty shells? Journal of European Public Policy Vol. 17 No. 1 pp. 137-148.

  • EC European Commission 2017. Reflection paper on the social dimension of the future of Europe April 2017. [pdf]. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Eder C. Mochmann I. Quandt M. eds. 2014. Political Trust and Disenchantment with Politics Brill p. 240.

  • EP European Parliament 2017. Two years until the 2019 European elections. [pdf]. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Chatham House 2017. The Future of Europe: Comparing Public and Elite Attitudes. [pdf]. [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • FH Freedom House 2017a. Nations in Transit 2017. [pdf.]. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • FH Freedom House 2017b. Breaking Down Democracy: Goals Strategies and Methods of Modern Authoritarians [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Fischer F. 2012. Participatory governance: from theory to practice. In: Levi-Faur D. ed. The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 457-471.

  • Foa R.S. Ekiert G. 2017. The weakness of postcommunist civil society reassessed. European Journal of Political Research Vol. 56 No. 2 pp. 419-439

  • Fukuyama F. 1995. Trust: The social virtue and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press p. 445.

  • GRECO Group of States Against Corruption 2016. 16th General Activity Report. Council of Europe. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Kaase M. 2009. Perspectives on political participation. In: Dalton R. Klingemann H.-D. eds. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 783-796.

  • Levi-Faur D. 2012. Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press p. 803.

  • Lindberg S. Lührmann A. Mechkova V. 2017. Mapping dimensions and sequences of accountability. World Development Report World Bank Group http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/324501487592445304/Mapping-dimensions-and-sequences-of-accountability. [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Magalhaes P. 2014. Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research Vol. 53 No. 1 pp. 77-97.

  • Maloney W. Rossteutscher S. eds. 2007. Social Capital and Associations in European Democracies Routledge p. 308.

  • McLaverty P. 2011. Participation. In M. Bevir ed. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Governance. London: Sage pp. 402-418.

  • Mishler W. Rose R. 2001. What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies Vol. 34 No. 1 pp. 30-62

  • Newton K. 2009. Social and political trust. In: R. Dalton H.-D. Klingemann eds. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 342-360.

  • OGP Open Government Partnership 2016a. Open Letter to the OGP Steering Committee 26 April 2016 (66 civil organizations Léderer Sándor et al.) https://www.access-info.org/wp-content/uploads/OGP_SC_OpenLetter_29April2016.pdf

  • OGP Open Government Partnership (2016b) Support Unit Statement by OGP’s Criteria with a joint Proposal for Dialogue with Government of Hungary 22 June 2016 http://www.opengovpartnership.org/blog/ogp-webmaster/2016/06/22/statement-ogps-criteria-and-standards-subcommittee-regarding.

  • Putnam R. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press p. 247.

  • Roth F. Nowak-Lehmann F. Otter T. 2011. Has the financial crisis shattered citizens’ trust in national and European governmental institutions? Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS) p. 27.

  • Rucht D. 2012. Political Participation in Europe. In: R. Sakwa A. Stevens eds. 2012. Contemporary Europe.New York: Palgrave-Macmillan pp. 128-148.

  • Sakwa R. Stevens A. eds. 2012. Contemporary Europe. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan p. 286.

  • Scharpf F. 2015. After the Crash: A perspective on Multilevel European Democracy. European Law Journal Vol. 21 No. 3 pp. 384-403.

  • Schmidt V. 2010. Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input Output and Throughput [pdf]. Freie Universität Berlin Working paper No. 21. Available at: [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Stiglitz J. 2017. Lessons from the anti-globalists. International Politics and Society. Available at: http://www.ips-journal.eu/topics/international-relations/article/show/lessons-from-the-anti-globalists-2016/ [Accessed 10 August 2017].

  • Stolle D. 2009. Social capital. In: R. Dalton H.-D. Klingemann eds. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 655-674.

  • Van Deth J. Ramón Montero J. Westholm A. eds. 2006. Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. Routledge p. 500.

  • WGI Worldwide Governance Indicators (2017) World Bank Governance Reports http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#reports

  • Závecz G. 2017. Post-communist societies of Central and Eastern Europe. In: S. Zmerli T. van der Meer eds. 2017. Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar pp. 440-459.

  • Zmerli S. van der Meer T. eds. 2017. Handbook on Political Trust. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar p. 560.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 185 50 4
PDF Downloads 90 43 2