Great Potential But Little Impact: The European Union’s Protection Policies for the Baltic Sea

Open access


Since the completion of the Eastern enlargement in 2004, a major responsibility for addressing the Baltic Sea pollution lies with the European Union. It provides strong institutions to facilitate environmental decision-making and to enforce the implementation of regulations. However, the measures taken so far have not been sufficient to significantly improve the state of the Baltic Sea. In particular, the Common Agricultural Policy does not take the ecological characteristics of the region into consideration. Instead, it provides false incentives since it generally encourages farmers to increase production and to extend areas under cultivation. To enhance the EU’s role, it is crucial to raise the awareness of the Baltic Sea’s vulnerability in Brussels. Moreover, European regulations and policies should become more flexible and match the regional specific environmental requirements. At the same time, too heavy financial burdens and distortions of competition, especially for the region’s agricultural sector, should be avoided.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ågren K. 2008. Critical legislation delayed. Acid News 3 pp. 1–3.

  • Bertram Ch. and Rehdanz K. 2012. On the environmental effectiveness of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Marine Policy 26 June.

  • Bongardt D. 2007. Multi-Level-Governance und Europäische Umweltpolitik. In: Brunnengräber A. and Walk H. (eds.). Multi-Level-Governance Klima- Umwelt- und Sozialpolitik in einer interdependenten Welt. Nomos: Baden-Baden pp. 49–74.

  • Council of the EC. 1976. Council Directive concerning the quality of bathing water. Official Journal of the European Communities No L 31/1 05.02.

  • Council of the EU. 2000. Directive establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327 22.12.

  • Council of the EU. 2006. Member States’ written contributions to the policy debate on the proposal for a Marine Strategy Directive 14168/06 Interinstitutional File: 2005/0211 (COD) Brussels 19 October.

  • Council of the EU. 2007. Draft statement of the Council’s reasons 9388/07 Interinstitutional File: 2005/0211 (COD) Brussels 3 July.

  • Council of the EU. 2008. Directive establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Communities L 164 25.06.

  • Dworak T. et al. 2010. Assessment of agriculture measures included in the draft River Basin Management Plans. Berlin: Ecologic Institute Summary Report.

  • EEA. 2006. Integration of environment into EU agriculture policy – the IRENA indicator-based assessment report. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency Report No 2.

  • EEB. 2004. Air pollution from ships. European Environmental Bureau briefing document. Available from: [Accessed 14 Feb 2010].

  • European Commission. 2001. White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ COM(2001) 370 final.

  • European Commission. 2006. Green Paper ‘Towards a future Maritime Policy for the Union: A European vision for the oceans and seas’ COM(2006) 275 final.

  • European Commission. 2010. Final Proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 as regards the use of phosphates and other phosphorous compounds in household laundry detergents COM(2010) 597.

  • European Commission. 2011. Report on the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region COM(2011) 381 final Brussels 22 June.

  • European Commission. 2012. Communication concerning the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region COM(2012) 128 final.

  • European Parliament. 2000. Report on Implementation of Directive 91/676/EEC on nitrates(2000/2110(INI)).

  • European Parliament. 2006a. REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Framework for Community Action in the field of Marine Environmental Policy (Marine Strategy Directive) FINAL A6-0373/2006.

  • European Parliament. 2006b. ‘European Parliament resolution on a Thematic Strategy on the Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment’ (2006/2174(INI)).

  • Feindt P. 2008. Agrarpolitik. In: Heinelt Hubert and Michèle Knodt eds. Politikfelder im EU-Mehrebenen-system Instrumente und Strategien europäischen Regierens. Baden-Baden: Nomos pp. 191–212.

  • Guttenstein E. 2007. The Potential of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) to Address Diffuse Pollution from Agriculture and Consequent Eutrophication of the Baltic Marine Environment. Brussels: Verda Policy.

  • HELCOM. 2006. Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea. Helsinki: HELCOM.

  • HELCOM. 2009. Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea. Helsinki: HELCOM.

  • IEEP. 2007. The Role of the EU Nitrates Water Framework and Proposed Marine Strategy Directives in Reducing Nutrient Pollution from Agriculture to the Baltic Sea. Institute for European Environmental Policy Report March.

  • Kern K. and Löffelsend T. 2008. Governance beyond the Nation State: Transnationalization and Europeanization of the Baltic Sea Region. In: Joas Marko et al. (eds.). Governing a Common Sea: Environmental Policies in the Baltic Sea Region. London: Earthscan pp. 115–141.

  • Knill Ch. and Liefferink D. 2007. Environmental politics in the European Union: policy-making implementation and patterns of multi-level governance. Manchester: University Press.

  • Larsson M. and Granstedt A.2010. Sustainable governance of the agriculture and the Baltic Sea – Agricultural reforms food production and curbed eutrophication. Ecological Economics 69 pp. 1943–1951.

  • McGroarty P. 2008. Bad news blooms in the Baltic. Can a new cleanup plan save the sea? Spiegel Online International 01.02.2008. Available from:,1518,524139,00.html [Accessed 3 Feb 2012]

  • Nechiporuk D. et al. 2011. Russia – a special actor in Baltic Sea environmental governance. In: Pihlajamäki Mia and Nina Tynkkynen (eds.). Governing the blue-green Baltic Sea. Societal challenges of marine eutrophication prevention. Helsinki: FIIA Report 31 pp. 44–54.

  • Österblom H. et al. 2010. Making the ecosystem approach operational: Can regime shifts in ecological and governance systems facilitate the transition? Marine Policy 34 pp. 1290–1299.

  • Prat J.-L. 1990. The role and activities of the European Communities in the protection and the preservation of the marine environment of the North Sea. In: Freestone D. and Ijlstra T. (eds.). The North Sea: Perspectives on regional environmental co-operation. London: Graham & Trotman pp. 101–110.

  • Richards J.P. and Heard J. 2005. European Environmental NGOs: Issues resources and strategies in marine campaigns. Environmental Politics 14 pp. 23–41.

  • Salomon M. 2009. Recent European initiatives in marine protection policy: Towards lasting protection for Europe’s seas? Environmental Science & Policy 12 pp. 359–366.

  • Scheuer S. and Rouillard J. 2009. What Future for EU’s Water? Indicator-based assessment of the draft River Basin Management Plans under the EU Water Framework Directive. London: WWF and European Environmental Bureau.

  • Schymik C. 2011. Blueprint for a Macro-Region. EU Strategies for the Baltic Sea and Danube Regions. Berlin: SWP Research Paper.

  • Vestreng V. et al. 2009. Evolution of NOx emissions in Europe with focus on road transport control measures. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9 pp. 1503–1520.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 90 48 3
PDF Downloads 53 32 4