Polish Democracy Under Threat? An Issue of Mere Politics or a Real Danger?

Sava Jankovic 1
  • 1 University of Dundee, School of Law (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)

Abstract

Poland has recently experienced a constitutional crisis. The crisis involves the role of the Law and Justice Party (PiS) in the election of judges and amendments to the Constitutional Tribunal Act which threatens the independence of the Tribunal. The situation is exacerbated by changes in the media, civil service, police, and prosecution laws introduced by the ruling party. This article analyses the changes, as well as the domestic and international reactions to the crisis, and considers whether the heavy criticism of the PiS is justified, or whether it results from, for instance, specific characteristics of the Polish political system and an unfavourable opinion in Europe about the Law and Justice party.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. “A New EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law.” Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council (March 19, 2014). COM (2014) 158 final/2.

  • 2. Ash, Timothy-Garton. “The pillars of Poland’s democracy are being destroyed.” The Guardian (January 17, 2016).

  • 3. Barnett, Hilaire. Constitutional & Administrative Law. Oxon: Routledge, 2013.

  • 4. Berendt, Joanna. “Poland’s President Approves Controls on State Media, Alarming E.U. Leaders.” The New Your Times (January 7, 2016).

  • 5. Cichowlas, Ola, and Andrew Foxall. “The State of Democracy after 25 Years: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe.” RSC Policy Paper 2 (2015).

  • 6. Elliott, Mark. “Bicameralism, sovereignty, and the unwritten Constitution.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (2007): 370–379.

  • 7. Garlicki, Lech. Polskie prawo konstytucyjne. Warsaw: Liber, 2006.

  • 8. Hassel, Florian. “Polen: Kaczyński tritt die Demokratie mit Füßen.” Süddeutsche Zeitung (November 27, 2015).

  • 9. “How to Protect European Values – Assessing European Responses to Recent Reforms in Poland.” Webcast of the Max Plank Society and Verfassungsblog (March 14, 2016) // https://www.mpg.de/10330824/max-planck-forum-berlin-protecting-european-values-poland.

  • 10. Joint letter of the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights, the Panoptykon Foundation and the Polish Bar Council to the president of Venice Commission Gianni Buquicchio of 2 December 2015 // http://www.hfhr.pl/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/HFHR_venice_comission_2122015.pdf.

  • 11. Koncewicz, Tomasz Tadeusz. “The Polish Constitutional Crisis and ‘Politics of Paranoia’.” Verfassungsblog (March 11, 2016).

  • 12. Mazurek, Beata. “KOD to Komitet Obrony Demagogii.” wiadomosci.wp.pl (March 12, 2016) // http://wiadomosci.wp.pl/kat,1329,title,Beata-Mazurek-KOD-to-Komitet-Obrony-Demagogii,wid,18210107,wiadomosc.html?ticaid=116a9b.

  • 13. Müller, Jan-Werner. “Safeguarding democracy inside the EU: Brussels and the future of liberal order.” Transatlantic Academy Paper Series 3 (2013): 1–29.

  • 14. “Pologne: manifestations ‘pour la démocratie’.” Le Figaro (December 19, 2015).

  • 15. “Proposed changes to the selection of management in public service broadcasters.” Press statement of the OSCE media freedom representative Dunja Mijatović (December 30, 2015).

  • 16. Radwan, Arkadiusz. “Chess-Boxing Around the Rule of Law – Polish Constitutionalism at Trial.” Allerhand Working Paper 13 (2016): 1–19.

  • 17. Radwan, Arkadiusz. “Lange Tradition und kurzes Gedächtnis des polnischen Konstitutionalismus – ein Beitrag zum Verständnis der Verfassungskrise von 2015-16” (A Long Tradition and Short Memory of the Polish Constitutionalism – A Contribution Towards Comprehending the Constitutional Crisis of 2015-16). Allerhand Working Paper 14 (2016): 1–17.

  • 18. “Safeguards for pluralism and independence of public service media governance in Poland.” Joint statement of the European Broadcasting Union, Association of European Journalists, European Federation of Journalists, Reporters Without Borders and Committee to Protect Journalists (December 30, 2015) // http://europeanjournalists.org/blog/2015/12/30/poland-media-organisations-to-oppose-abolition-of-safeguards-for-pluralism-and-independence-in-public-service-media.

  • 19. Sarnecki, Paweł. Prawo Konstytucyjne RP. Cracow: CH Beck, 2013.

  • 20. Schulz, Martin. “Das ist gelenkte Demokratie nach Putins Art.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (January 9, 2016).

  • 21. Śledzińska-Simon, Anna. “Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal under Siege.” Verfassungsblog (December 4, 2015) // http://verfassungsblog.de/polands-constitutional-tribunal-under-siege/.

  • 22. Sozański, Jarosław. “Zasada demokratycznego państwa prawnego w polskiej praktyce prawnej.” KNUV 4 (2014): 28–40.

  • 23. “Spirala histerii się nakręca: Schetyna i Petru jadą do Brukseli skarżyć się na polski rząd!?” wpolityce.pl (March 12, 2016) //“http://wpolityce.pl/polityka/274247-tylko-u-nas-spirala-histerii-sie-nakrecaschetyna-i-petru-jada-do-brukseli-skarzyc-sie-na-polski-rzad-zanosi-sie-tezna-debate-w-pe.

  • 24. “The EU and the Rule of Law – What next?” European Union Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding’s speech. Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels (September 4, 2013) // http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-13-677_en.htm.

  • 25. Veser, Reinhard. “Polens Demokratie ist in Gefahr.” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (December 17, 2015).

  • 26. Weyand, Philip. “Politik, Recht und die Rule of Law irgendwo dazwischen: zur Rechtsstaatlichkeitsdebatte zwischen EU und Polen.” Verfassungsblog, (January 21, 2016) // http://verfassungsblog.de/politik-recht-und-die-rule-oflaw-irgendwo-dazwischen-zur-rechtsstaatlichkeitsdebatte-zwischen-eu-undpolen/.

  • 27. Wilson, Andrew. “After 25 Years, Are Central and Eastern Europe’s Democracies in Danger?” CIPE Development Blog (March 19, 2013).

  • 1. Act amending the Civil Service Act and other Acts of 30 December 2015. Journal of Laws [Dz. U.], No. 0, Item 34.

  • 2. Act amending the Constitutional Tribunal Act of 22 December 2015. Journal of Laws [Dz. U.], No. 0, Item 2217.

  • 3. Act amending the National Broadcasting Act of 30 December 2015. Journal of Laws [Dz. U.], No. 0, Item 25.

  • 4. Bill amending the Prosecution Act of 24 December 2015. The Sejm Print, no 162.

  • 5. Burdov v. Russia. European Court of Human Rights. 2002, no. 59498/00.

  • 6. Civil Procedure Code. Journal of Laws [Dz. U.], 1964 No. 43, item. 296, as amended.

  • 7. Civil Service Act. Journal of Laws [Dz. U.], 2008 No. 227, Item 1505.

  • 8. Constitutional Tribunal Act. Journal of Laws [Dz. U.], 1997 No. 102, item 643, as amended.

  • 9. Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Journal of Laws [Dz. U.], 1997 No. 78, Item 483, as amended.

  • 10. Decision of the Constitutional Tribunal U 8/15 of 7 January 2016. ZU OTK No. A/2016, pos. 1.

  • 11. Decision of the Constitutional Tribunal P 12/98 of 22 March 2000. OTK ZU No 2/2000, pos. 67.

  • 12. Hornsby v. Greece. European Court of Human Rights. 1997, no. 18357/91.

  • 13. Gerasimov and Others v. Russia. European Court of Human Rights. 2014, no. 29920/05.

  • 14. Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal K 34/15 of 3 December 2015. Journal of Laws [Dz. U.], No. 0, Item 2129.

  • 15. Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal K 35/15 of 9 December 2015. Journal of Laws [Dz. U.], No. 0, Item 2147.

  • 16. Judgement of the Constitutional Tribunal K 47/15 of 9 December 2015. Not published yet.

  • 17. Mirosław Garlicki v. Poland. European Court of Human Rights. 2011, no. 36921/07.

  • 18. Resolution 303/XI/2015 of the Law Faculty Board of the Jagiellonian University of 30 November 2015.

  • 19. Resolutions of the Sejm of 25 November 2015. Official Gazette of the Republic of Poland, Monitor Polski, pos.: 1131, 1132, 1133, 1134, 1135.

  • 20. Resolutions of the Sejm of 2 December 2015. Official Gazette of the Republic of Poland, Monitor Polski, pos.: 1182, 1183, 1184, 1185, 1186.

  • 21. Royal Assent Act 1976.

  • 22. Venice Commission Amicus Curiae Opinion CDL-AD (2009)044 on the Law on the cleanliness of the figure of high functionaries of the Public Administration and Elected Persons of Albania adopted at 80th Plenary Session. Venice (October 9-10, 2009).

  • 23. Venice Commission Opinion CDL-AD (2006)006 on the Two Draft Laws amending Law No. 47/1992 on the organisation and functioning of the Constitutional Court of Romania adopted at 66th plenary session. Venice (March 17-18, 2006).

  • 24. Venice Commission Opinion CDL-AD (2011)003rev, Report on the rule of law – Adopted at 86th plenary session. Venice (March 25-26, 2011).

  • 25. Venice Commission Opinion CDL-AD (2012)026-e on the compatibility with Constitutional principles and the Rule of Law of actions taken by the Government and the Parliament of Romania in respect of other State institutions adopted by the Venice Commission at its 93rd plenary session, Venice (March 14-15, 2012).

  • 26. Venice Commission Opinion CDL-AD (2016)001 on the Amendments of the Act of 25 June 2015 on the Constitutional Tribunal of Poland adopted at 106th Plenary Session. Venice (March 11-12, 2016).

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search