The article argues that despite the evident link between political environment and security of energy supply, political elements are not sufficiently represented in contemporary scientific literature, namely in indexes that are designed for the assessment of security of energy supply. In an attempt to fill this gap, the article presents an innovative methodology for quantitative assessment of the political vulnerabilities on security of energy supply and applies it to the analysis of the Baltic States.
The proposed index determines the plausibility of the occurrence of threats of a political nature on the security of energy supply and defines it as political vulnerability. The application of index methodology to an analysis of the Baltic States has revealed that the overall political vulnerability on security of energy supply is the highest in Lithuania, considerably lower in Latvia, and the lowest in Estonia. The analysis has shown that political vulnerability has increased in Lithuania due to the closure of Ignalina NPP and an increase in energy import quantities from politically unstable countries, such as Russia. On the contrary, political vulnerabilities on the security of the energy supply have decreased in Latvia and Estonia due to the increase of consumption of indigenous energy. However, preliminary calculations show that political vulnerabilities should decrease considerably in 2015 in Lithuania due to the diversification of the natural gas supply.
1. Augutis, Juozas, et al. Lietuvos energetinis saugumas. Metinė apžvalga 2011-2012. Kaunas: Vytautas Magnus University, 2013.
2. Augutis, Juozas, et al. Lietuvos energetinis saugumas. Metinė apžvalga 2012-2013. Kaunas: Vytautas Magnus University, 2014.
3. Augutis, Juozas, et al. Lietuvos energetinis saugumas. Metinė apžvalga 2014-2015. Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojoj universitetas, 2016.
4. Balmaceda, Margarita M. “Corruption, Intermediary Companies, and Energy Security: Lithuania’s Lessons for Central and Eastern Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 55 (2008): 16–28 //DOI: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216550402.
5. Baran, Zeyno. Lithuanian Energy Security: Challenges and Choices. Vilnius: Centre for Strategic Studies, 2006.
6. Brown, Marylin A. “Forty Years of Energy Security Trends: A Comparative Assessment of 22 Industrialized Countries.” Energy Research and Social Science 4 (2014): 64–77.
14. Grost, Isabel, and Nina Poussenkova. Petroleum Ambassadors of Russia: State versus Corporate Policy in the Caspian Region. Kent: Rice University, 1998.
15. Grigas, Agnia. “Energy Policy: The Achilles Heel of the Baltic States”: 65–85. In: Agnia Grigas, Andres Kasekamp, Kristina Maslauskaite, Liva Zorgenfreija, and Jerzy Buzek, eds. The Baltic States in the EU: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Paris: Notre Europe, 2013.
18. Janeliūnas, Tomas, and Arūnas Molis. “Energy Security of Lithuania: Challenges and Perspectives.” Lithuanian Political Science Yearbook (2005): 200–233.
19. Janeliūnas, Tomas. “Lithuanian Energy Strategy and its Implications on Regional Cooperation”: 190–222. In: Andris Sprūds and Toms Rostoks, eds. Energy: Pulling the Baltic Sea Region Together or Apart. Riga: Zinatne, 2009.
20. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. “The Worldwide Governance Indicators. Methodology and Analytical Issues.” Policy Research Working Paper 5430 (2010): 1–5.
21. Kaufmann, Daniel, and Aart Kraay. “Governance Indicators: Where Are We, Where Should We Be Going?” Policy Research Working Paper 4370 (2007): 1–43.
22. Kolstad, Ivar, and Tina Søreide. “Corruption in Natural Resource Management: Implications for Policy Makers.” Resources Policy 34 (2009): 214–226 //DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2009.05.001.
23. Larsson, Robert L. Russia‘s Energy Policy: Security Dimensions and Russia‘s reliability as Energy Supplier. Stockholm: FOI-Swedish Defense Research Agency, 2006.
25. McLarty, Thomas F. “Latin America”: 344–360. In: Jan H. Kalicki and David L. Goldwyn, eds. Energy and Security. Strategies for World in Transition. Second Edition. Washington and Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.
26. Maigre, Merle. Energy Security Concerns of the Baltic States. Tallinn: International Centre for Defense Studies, 2010.
27. Molis, Arūnas. “Rethinking EU-Russia Energy Relations: what do the Baltic States want?” SPES Policy Papers (February 2011): 5–44.
29. Molis, Arūnas, and Justina Gliebutė. “Prospects for the Development of Nuclear Energy in the Baltic Region.” Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review 10 (2012): 121–151.
30. Molis, Arūnas, and Tomas Vaišnoras. “Energy Security through Membership in NATO and the EU: Interests and Achievements of Lithuania.” Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review 32 (2014): 13–32.
31. Molis, Arūnas, and Tomas Vaišnoras. “Išorinė bendroji ES energetikos politika ir Lietuvos interesai”: 319–349. In: Dovilė Jankniūnaitė, ed. Ambicingas dešimtmetis: Lietuvos užsienio politika 2004-2014. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2015.
32. Röller, Lars-Hendrik, Juan Delgado, and Hans W. Friederiszick. Energy: Choices for Europe. Brussels: Brugel Blueprint Series, 2007.
33. Scheepers, Martin, Ad Seebregts, Jacques de Jong, and Hans Maters. EU Standards for Energy Security of Supply. Clingendael: Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands and Clingendael International Energy Programme, 2006.
34. Sen, Samil, and Babali Tuncay. “Security Concerns in the Middle East for Oil Supply: Problems and Sollutions.” Energy Policy 35 (2007): 1517–1524 // DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.05.001.
36. Sprūds, Andris. “Latvian Russian Energy Relations: between Economics and Politics”: 110–119. In: Nils Mužnieks, ed. Latvian – Russian Relations: Dynamics since Latvia’s Accession to the EU and NATO. Riga: University of Latvia Press, 2011.
37. Soroos, Marvin S. “Global Change, Environmental Security, and the Prisoner’s Dilemma.” Journal of Peace Research 31 (1994): 317–332.
38. Sovacool, Benjamin K. “Introduction: Defining, Measuring and Exploring Energy Security”: 1–42; In: Benjamin K. Sovacool, ed. Routledge Handbook of Energy Security. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.
39. Tagarinski, Mario, and Anrius Avizius. “Energy Security for the Euro-Atlantic Region”: 1–32. In: Stephen Stec and Besnic Baraj, eds. Energy and Environmental Challenges to Security. Springer: Dordrecht, 2007.
40. Tarus, Triinu, and Matthew Crandall. “Is Russia a Threat to Estonian Energy Security?” Baltic Journal of Political Science 1 (2012): 77–91.
44. Vaičiūnas, Žygimantas. “Common European Union Energy Policy on the Making and the Interests of Lithuania.” Politologija 55 (2009): 89–120.
45. Vilpišauskas, Ramūnas. “National Preferences and Bargaining of the New Member States since the Enlargement of the EU: the Baltic States- Still Policy Takers?” Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review 25 (2011): 9–32.
46. Vilpišauskas, Ramūnas. “Lietuvos Europos politika: prioritetai ir jų (ne)įgyvendinimas”: 260–290. In: Dovilė Jankniūnaitė, ed. Ambicingas dešimtmetis: Lietuvos užsienio politika 2004-2014. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 2015.
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.102 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.276
researchers and scholars in the fields of law and politics, with an acute interest in the cross-pollinations of disciplines, comparative approaches to regional issues, and active dialogue on pressing contemporary issues of theoretical and practical import.